The density of planets and birekland currents
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:52 pm
The density of planets and birekland currents
I watched the video by Donald Scott explaining how Dark matter is debunked and was stunned to discover that the graph i had plotted showing density of different planets in our solar system, in fact looked very similar to what was shown on the video.
https://youtu.be/BWW_mtihc1Q
I simply plotted the compressed densities of the planets in our solar system as shown at https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/St ... ities.html
I added a second line graph for the uncompressed densities. I could not find like 80% or so of the uncompressed densities of the planets, so i used the same compressed densities to generate the second line graph. Of course you can see that Mercury has a much higher uncompressed density than earth.
It seems from observation that objects appear to align themselves by how dense they are.
Anyways i found it interesting.
https://youtu.be/BWW_mtihc1Q
I simply plotted the compressed densities of the planets in our solar system as shown at https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/St ... ities.html
I added a second line graph for the uncompressed densities. I could not find like 80% or so of the uncompressed densities of the planets, so i used the same compressed densities to generate the second line graph. Of course you can see that Mercury has a much higher uncompressed density than earth.
It seems from observation that objects appear to align themselves by how dense they are.
Anyways i found it interesting.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: The density of planets and birekland currents
I think it more likely that all planets and large satellites have similar densities (all rock after all) and the further the distance from the sun the weaker their gravitational effect.
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 4:38 pm
Re: The density of planets and birekland currents
I can't see the graph as the forum doesn't allow me access to it?
I see "You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post." in red.
I'd love to see the plot. Does it include the sun and moons of our solar system?
I think the title also has a typo.
Anyway, I happened to want to ask a question here on the topic of the density of planets, so I can probably hitch a ride on this topic.
I just watched a video of Pierre-Marie Robitaille, not a EU theorist, but still anti-dark magic, where he proposes that the sun is made out of metallic hydrogen, because of it's low density.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox1GNuCV5M0
My question is,
what is Thunderbolt's opinion on the sun (and I assume P-M. Robitaille would argue Jupiter and Saturn too)
having a solid metallic hydrogen core?
And if the sun has an iron core, why are the density measurements so low?
I see "You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post." in red.
I'd love to see the plot. Does it include the sun and moons of our solar system?
I think the title also has a typo.
Anyway, I happened to want to ask a question here on the topic of the density of planets, so I can probably hitch a ride on this topic.
I just watched a video of Pierre-Marie Robitaille, not a EU theorist, but still anti-dark magic, where he proposes that the sun is made out of metallic hydrogen, because of it's low density.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ox1GNuCV5M0
My question is,
what is Thunderbolt's opinion on the sun (and I assume P-M. Robitaille would argue Jupiter and Saturn too)
having a solid metallic hydrogen core?
And if the sun has an iron core, why are the density measurements so low?
Since 1 % 1, 1 * 1 and 1 - 1 do not add up, we must conclude that 1 + 1 is 3.
- JP Michael
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:19 am
Re: The density of planets and birekland currents
Sadly a long term issue with the forum- no attachments are visible. It would be better for the OP to link elsewhere to a copy.
-
- Posts: 1079
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am
Re: The density of planets and birekland currents
Great Video.nubian wrote: ↑Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:50 am I watched the video by Donald Scott explaining how Dark matter is debunked and was stunned to discover that the graph i had plotted showing density of different planets in our solar system, in fact looked very similar to what was shown on the video.
https://youtu.be/BWW_mtihc1Q
https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science ... -find-dark
The article doesn’t say how much it will cost, but one NASA source (https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/GLAS ... swers.html ) said that said Nasa’s Fermi Large Area Telescope (once called GLAST) cost at least $690 million (in pre-2008 dollars, I think). That's a lot of money to toss down the drain.Chinese scientists want to build a powerful telescope to find dark matter
The ambitious project – known as VLAST – aims to achieve 10 times the sensitivity of Nasa’s Fermi Large Area Telescope
Researchers say it could go into orbit by the end of this decade, but it still needs government approval
Hope the Chinese see Dr Scott's book and reconsider.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2018 3:39 pm
Re: The density of planets and birekland currents
Hi, this might be the wrong place to put this idea but here it is. The photos from James Webb on Jupiter (Jupiter is pale and mysterious in this false-color Webb image. https://www.inverse.com/science/new-gho ... iter-rings) show separation of the southern Birkeland currents. Could these currents actually be a merger of historical currents that caused the change of the planet orbits in past history?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests