The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.
BeAChooser
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by BeAChooser » Thu Jan 20, 2022 8:35 pm

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 125419.htm
Worldwide coordinated search for dark matter

An international team of researchers with key participation from the PRISMA+ Cluster of Excellence at Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) and the Helmholtz Institute Mainz (HIM) has published for the first time comprehensive data on the search for dark matter using a worldwide network of optical magnetometers.

According to the scientists, dark matter fields should produce a characteristic signal pattern that can be detected by correlated measurements at multiple stations of the GNOME network.
LOL! I think this is an appropriate name for their project, don't you? And PRISM isn’t from just a “Center” of Excellence … it’s from a CLUSTER of Excellence! I'm impressed! But, sad to say and entirely predictable, after a month where an “international TEAM” (best of the best) searched tirelessly for dark matter using the GNOME network, they have to report that analysis of data “has not yet yield[ed] a corresponding indication” of a characteristic signal pattern that (they claim) dark matter *fields* should produce. Strange, given that what they were looking for is, according to one of those involved, “one of the most promising candidates for dark matter today.” You’d think, if DM is all around us … even streaming through us as DM scientists claim, they would have seen that signal by now, don't you?

So ... yet another DM boondoggle comes up empty. I wonder how much this one cost to set up and run? I couldn't find that (in fact, a lot of times that type of information is hard to come by). I wonder why? ;) In any event, they’re not giving up. No, those involved, like all DM researchers whose first or second or even tenth attempt to find the stuff fails, have BIG plans for the “collaboration” … to improve both the magnetometers in the network and the data analysis. Which of course will cost more $$$$$ ... and keep them employed for a while longer. Because when you have 49 authors on the paper announcing the current results of this one little effort, you have lot of mouths that need continuous feeding. As I've said before, the mainstream is now dependent on the DM gnome and have to keep it alive. NO MATTER WHAT.

jackokie
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by jackokie » Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:13 pm

@BeAChooser You're on a roll today. Do you want to tackle this? https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-tornadoes-mit
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.

BeAChooser
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by BeAChooser » Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:33 am

jackokie wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:13 pm @BeAChooser You're on a roll today. Do you want to tackle this? https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-tornadoes-mit
All I'll say is ... pretty cool, there sure is a lot we don't know and Einstein was a genius.

BeAChooser
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by BeAChooser » Fri Jan 21, 2022 2:09 am

jackokie wrote: Thu Jan 20, 2022 11:13 pm Do you want to tackle this? https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-tornadoes-mit
Actually, I do have a little more to say about this.

A poster just today asked me how *I* thought the sun works (seeing as I don't believe in the mainstream's gnomes). So what a coincidence that you should ask me your question because one supposes the double layers near the surface of the sun might contain something akin to a Bose Einstein Condensate (BEC) to explain the super hot corona. We know that a BEC can be formed not only by supercooling certain solids and plasmas, but by super heating plasma and gases. Some results from Safire Project have apparently been suggestive of that occurring in their recent experiments and the LENR community has been talking more and more about BECs as an explanation for what they see going on in their experiments.

And then there is the matter of antigravity. It’s been suggested that the UFOs now being caught on camera by the military produce antigravity from spinning a high velocity magnetic field though a BEC. And should it be true that a double layer can contain a BEC, then perhaps they are using electromagnetically generated DLs to produce BECs? That being said, have you ever hear of Foo Fighters (https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/weird- ... t-24743581, https://www.classifiedufo.com/wunderwaf ... ghter.html, https://www.history.com/news/wwii-ufos- ... o-fighters, https://eraoflight.com/2020/09/21/decla ... uilt-ufos/)? Maybe this idea isn’t something completely new? Just saying.

In fact, have you heard of the Fluxliner 720p (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afLsRsd5roY )? Have you paid attention to all the recent admittedly (by the government) unexplained UFO sightings that show some sort of air/sea vehicles that are doing seemingly impossible high speed maneuvers near US military aircraft, ships and installations? Perhaps all this focus on DM, DE and black holes by the mainstream is a way to distract everyone from what is really going on behind the curtain ... from the REAL physics that are being studied for national security reasons?

In that regard, ever hear of Dr Ning Li? She was a well regarded scientist who worked at the Center of Space Plasma and Aeronomic Research at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. She coauthored a series of papers from 1991 to 1993 that claimed anti-gravity could be produced by rotating ions creating a gravitomagnetic field perpendicular to their spin axis. In her theory, if a large number of ions could be aligned (in a BEC), the resulting effect would be a very strong gravitomagnetic field producing a strong repulsive force. In 1997 she published a paper that said experiments had validated her theory. Curiously, Dr Li left the University of Alabama in 1999 to found a company called AC Gravity LLC which was awarded a DOD grant in 2001 to continue anti-gravity research. The grant period ended and no results ever made public, yet as of 2021, AC Gravity LLC still exists. Rather odd for an idea that didn’t pan out? Eh? Just saying ... :D

jacmac
Posts: 890
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:36 pm

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by jacmac » Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:40 am

Be a chooser:
We know that a BEC can be formed not only by supercooling certain solids and plasmas, but by super heating plasma and gases. Some results from Safire Project have apparently been suggestive of that occurring in their recent experiments and the LENR community has been talking more and more about BECs as an explanation for what they see going on in their experiments.
I think the term "super heating" related with Bose Einstein condensates refers to raising the temperature of the condensates a little above the temps at which they normally change out of that state. Those temps would still be VERY COLD.
Not likely to be found in the corona.

Another example of "super heating", that I have experienced, is when water is heated above the normal boiling point; but it does not boil.
I heated a pyrex cup of water , It was very hot but not boiling. I thought it was not hot enough or calmed down before I saw it.
When I touched the cup it violently erupted in a dramatic fashion, and I was lucky to not get burned.

BeAChooser
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by BeAChooser » Sat Jan 22, 2022 2:19 am

jacmac wrote: Sat Jan 22, 2022 1:40 am I think the term "super heating" related with Bose Einstein condensates refers to raising the temperature of the condensates a little above the temps at which they normally change out of that state. Those temps would still be VERY COLD.
Not likely to be found in the corona.
LOL! You caught me in one of my less lucid (but more fun) moments. :D

BeAChooser
Posts: 1052
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by BeAChooser » Fri Jan 28, 2022 5:52 pm

https://www.labroots.com/trending/chemi ... k-matter-2
In the future, the GNOME project will continue to improve their magnetometers to be more stable, thus allowing them to operate longer than an hour. This should allow them to search more continuously and increase the chances of dark matter observation. They also intend to replace the alkali atoms used in the magnetometers with noble gases, which will give the instruments greater sensitivity.

These improvements will continue under the title of “Advanced GNOME,”
Not just gnomes but ADVANCED gnomes!

Likely the *advanced* part just means they’ll be even more costly.

jackokie
Posts: 251
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am

Re: The GNOME Network ... I kid you not

Unread post by jackokie » Fri Jan 28, 2022 6:45 pm

@BeAChooser Or perhaps "Advanced Cognitive Issues".
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest