Magnetism
-
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:53 am
Magnetism
Greetings EU Pilgrims, main stream science found magnetism action all over the univers, but failed to accept or denied the electrical output that must create these magnetic fields. A magnetic field has an intensity from there we should be able to find the intensity of the electrical output producing it? When we can prove the existence of the electrical currents the search should focus on harnessing and using these sources.Possible?? Regards Beekeeper
If nothing can travel faster than light, how can darkness escape it
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:40 pm
Re: Magnetism
[sarc] It is so obvious is almost doesn't deserve mention. [/sarc]
-
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 3:53 am
Re: Magnetism
Greetings Maol apparently the obvious has obviously escape the scientific community at large, the astrophysics branche of this community have been avoiding the electrical elephant in the lab for too long. Soon they will be bumping into it, will they discard it again or really try to I look at it as a driving force in the Univers. The Hadron collider has been use for years to materialize mathematical equations based on gravity only forces and kinetic energy. The ironies of all this can brings one to an uncontrolled sobbing as all their so called experiments would leave the team an assembly of dark matter without the unprecedented output of electricity needed to power their accelerator. Regards Beekeeper
If nothing can travel faster than light, how can darkness escape it
-
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2020 1:10 am
Re: Magnetism
beekeeper, maol, and other interested parties: Fundamentally, I believe the "astrofizzicks" community gets away with this silliness because they are allowed to get away with it. Please see my March 30 post on the "Would you like fries with that and what size" topic. I welcome your opinions and comments.
Thanks.
P.S.
One of the practices that fuels my skepticism about AGW is the homogenization and extrapolation of temperatures where instrumentation is scarce. How much more granular would the temperature map be if some of the money poured down the LIGO rathole were instead devoted to this problem? (Or as some might put it, poured down the AGW rathole instead. )
Thanks.
P.S.
One of the practices that fuels my skepticism about AGW is the homogenization and extrapolation of temperatures where instrumentation is scarce. How much more granular would the temperature map be if some of the money poured down the LIGO rathole were instead devoted to this problem? (Or as some might put it, poured down the AGW rathole instead. )
Time is what prevents everything from happening all at once.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests