Astrophysicists insist that we should embrace *two* types of "dark energy", without naming so much as a source of either of them, without a single published paper that actually supports that claim?The new map also revealed a discrepancy between the universe's previously accepted rate of expansion, called the Hubble constant, and the rate calculated based on how far Earth is from the closest nearby galaxies. One possible explanation for this, Bautista told Business Insider, is that a different type of dark energy was present in the very early universe, altering the rate of expansion.
The ironically amusing thing about this new study is that it scientifically demonstrates that the LCDM model is *internally self conflicted*. It has been self conflicted for several years, and they still have no plausible (published) explanation to explain it, *except* by assuming that we live inside of a less dense region of space, and then there's no need for dark energy at all.
This new study, and the absurd commentary about a *second* type of 'dark energy" that follows, only demonstrates how far down the metaphysical rabbit hole the mainstream has gone.
The whole BAO claim has boxed the mainstream into a corner, it's a *failure* in terms of demonstrating any mathematical consistency in the LCDM model, and yet it's *still* being hyped to try to "support" the expansion model. Sheesh. The self conflicted metaphysical BS just never ends.
The part that really kills me however is the fact that the mainstream has all the observational evidence that they need to support the presence of electrical currents in space. We see "helix" (AKA Birkeland currents) structures that link various galaxies in space. We see "magnetic ropes" connecting the sun to various planets. The mainstream calls these current carrying 'ropes'/helix like structures *anything* except their correct scientific term, specifically "Birkeland currents". These are features and behaviors of current carrying plasma that Birkeland wrote about before the term plasma even existed. He recognized the fact that different charged particles coming from the sun would follow different trajectories away from the sun, and he provided mathematical models to describe that trajectory of charged particles from the sun.
Mainstream astronomers cannot even explain a full sphere sustained hot corona around the sun. Birkeland however showed how it works (in the lab) over a century ago, and demonstrated how it produces a sustained planetary aurora as well.
The evidence to support the electric universe is staring them all in the face, from the multi-million degree coronal loops we see in high resolution images of the sun, to the sustained hot corona, the sustained planetary aurora that we observe, etc.
As much as the mainstream astronomers would like to try to erase the first fifty or so years of 'electric universe' theory they will let their own ignorance of scientific history lead them astray. Astronomy has been far too detached from the lab for far too long, from fruitless searches for exotic stable forms of matter, to "dark" math galore.
Circuit theory applied to objects in a positively charged "space" (AKA constant speed of light cosmic ray bombardment) can explain many types of plasma activity in current carrying environments, which cannot otherwise be explained without it.
