Mind you, she’s the next generation of astrophysicists.
https://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2018 ... rk-matter/
In it, she regurgitates the main pillar of Dark Matter evidence ... that only DM can explain the rotation curves of galaxies. But this is absolutely and demonstrably false. And we've known it's false for nearly 40 years because way back in the 1980s Anthony Peratt, a plasma physicist, proved it was false. He showed that the rotation curves of galaxies don’t need dark matter to explain them ... that electromagnetic effects on plasma can do it. And we know these electromagnetic effects exist because we can create them in our labs here on earth. And we now know that they exist in galaxies as far as we can see out there. We know it with far more certainty than the DM advocates *know* DM exists. We can even model these phenomena ... not invisible entities ... with certainty rather than delusion.Seeing the Invisible: A short history of the scientific evidence of dark matter
So here’s my question, folks. If the mainstream won’t even discuss Peratt’s work, what are we to do? If the mainstream won't even teach future astrophysicists about the work of Peratt, what are we to do? If the media is used to propagandize the DM falsehoods and refuses to do it's own investigation of the truth, what are we to do? How are we ever going to make any progress this effort we're involved in?
Go on trying to use honey? If you believe that, you are kidding yourself. We are wasting our time trying to stop these people with honey.
It’s time to get serious and stop them by taking away their funding, even if it means cutting all funding for astrophysics conducted outside the solar system for a while. We need to put all the DM believing astrophysicists out of work so we can reboot astrophysics.
That’s the ONLY way we’re going to get it to return to conducting real science instead of a cultish belief in invisible gnomes.