The Most Devastatingly Subtle Misconception in the Whole Dang History of Science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cLI_nlEbJ4&t=746s
The Most Devastatingly Subtle Misconception in the Whole Dang History of Science
-
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:43 am
-
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:43 am
Re: The Most Devastatingly Subtle Misconception in the Whole Dang History of Science
Most devastatingly Subtle Misconception in the Whole Dang History of Science
Part Two
https://youtu.be/ejJ4HLfQWRM
Origins of Structure in the atmosphere.
James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
Part Two
https://youtu.be/ejJ4HLfQWRM
Origins of Structure in the atmosphere.
James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2021 9:24 pm
- Location: Ohio
Re: The Most Devastatingly Subtle Misconception in the Whole Dang History of Science
Hi JM
Watched your video. I remember some intense discussions in Ver 2 post on this topic. I think the most profitable thing I was left to ponder was how little certainty there is in this area of research ( at least what's released to the public ).
" allynh "in the Flat Earth thread has enlightened my method of inquiry. What sprang from it, is a way to put on other people's shoes ( be it, if they are left to dry facing up or facing down ). A method that enhances a dispassionate consideration and discussion. So please don't be insulted by this method if it comes across in any demeaning way. It will be my lack of skill in presenting it.
Watching the first video, the first thing that came to mind, was your insistence in previous discussions (forum version 2) that Water gas can't exist in conditions less than highly energized steam, if I remember right. I think this might be a contributing factor, to your original inspiration?
I liked your considering the viscosity of water in assessing the current theory. It gives a tool to reconsider accepted notions.
Revisiting your ideas has given me a perfect example of what I have been trying to articulate in the FE thread. For me the greatest value of your investigations is the example of originality, outside accepted norms. Thanks.
Watched your video. I remember some intense discussions in Ver 2 post on this topic. I think the most profitable thing I was left to ponder was how little certainty there is in this area of research ( at least what's released to the public ).
" allynh "in the Flat Earth thread has enlightened my method of inquiry. What sprang from it, is a way to put on other people's shoes ( be it, if they are left to dry facing up or facing down ). A method that enhances a dispassionate consideration and discussion. So please don't be insulted by this method if it comes across in any demeaning way. It will be my lack of skill in presenting it.
Watching the first video, the first thing that came to mind, was your insistence in previous discussions (forum version 2) that Water gas can't exist in conditions less than highly energized steam, if I remember right. I think this might be a contributing factor, to your original inspiration?
I liked your considering the viscosity of water in assessing the current theory. It gives a tool to reconsider accepted notions.
Revisiting your ideas has given me a perfect example of what I have been trying to articulate in the FE thread. For me the greatest value of your investigations is the example of originality, outside accepted norms. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2016 1:43 am
Secrets of Flow in the Atmosphere
Secrets of Flow in the Atmosphere
https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/episodes ... ow-e1smmfr
https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/episodes ... ow-e1smmfr
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests