Polarity Delusion, Elasticity Confusion

[jimmcginn]

Watch this video:
Relation Between H2O Polarity and Atmospheric Vortices Demystified
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TGGFo0QsGM

Polarity Delusion, Elasticity Confusion and the mistake that continues to scramble the minds of water researchers

Unlike that of the current paradigm of hydrogen bonding between water molecules, my model of hydrogen bonding between water molecules does not carry the assumption that their attractive forces--the same forces that cause H2O molecules to collectivize into a liquid (at ambient temperatures)--are a result of the lopsided way its covalently attached, polarity inducing hydrogen atoms are arranged relative to its oxygen atom as was assumed by Linus Pauling when he first laid out the rules of hydrogen bonding between water molecules way back in the 1950s. Instead my model carries the assumption these attractive forces are the result of the lopsided way the H2O molecule’s various electrical gradients are arranged relative to its three sets of nuclei (one associated with its oxygen atom and two hydrogen associated with its two hydrogen atoms), which itself is the result of the lopsided way its covalently attached, polarity inducing hydrogen atoms are arranged relative to its oxygen atom. You might be wondering, what’s the difference. Afterall, it's the lopsidedness in the way that hydrogen atoms become attached to oxygen atoms that causes the lopsidedness of the arrangement of the electrical gradients relative to its nuclei. Might this be a distinction without a difference? I contend that not only is it not a distinction without a difference but it is actually a huge conceptual breakthrough that will revolutionize our understanding of water by way of setting us on the path to resolving all of its anomalies and will ultimately allow us to better understand the full capabilities of water..

You are confused because everybody is confused. But you don’t know that everybody else is just as confused as you. You try to understand. You might even, from time to time, convince yourself that you understand. But actually you just believe and are failing to understand. You are pretending to understand. Everybody is pretending to understand. But you don’t know that. So you keep pretending and hope nobody notices that you are confused--just like everybody else. Everybody is hoping that nobody notices that they themselves are confused.

James McGinn / Genius
President of Solving Tornadoes

[Lloyd]

What do you think of these two papers?

The HYDROGEN BOND
http://milesmathis.com/water2.pdf

The Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadic Supercell Thunderstorms
http://charles-chandler.org/Geophysics/ ... ?text=full

Miles' paper seems similar to what you're saying about the hydrogen attaching due to the oxygen's configuration.
Charles' paper on tornadoes is the most thorough and plausible one that I know of.

I haven't yet read any of your other material on this forum at https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/forum3/ph ... 6&sr=posts
I probably won't have time to do so soon.

I just viewed your video on Hydrogen Bonding in Water Solved at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAuYt6T0A6o but I didn't listen to much of it. I just looked to see if you had illustrations etc. I don't see any.

[jimmcginn]

Mathis does a good job clearly describing the shift in electron cloud(s)--making them oblong, off-center--that underlies the polarity of the H2O molecule but then he goes on to make the same mistake the current paradigm has made in that he failed to recognize that hydrogen bonds with adjoining H2O molecules pushes each other's respective electron clouds on center again, reversing polarity.

In other words, like the current paradigm, Mathis has failed to grasp the fact that H2O is a solvent of its own polarity. Consequently, like the current paradigm, Mathis botched any possibility of correctly comprehending the anomalies of H2O, which actually are the result of H2O polarity emerging in the context of situational factors in which the ability of H2O to be a solvent for its own polarity is itself defeated.

The mistake Linus Pauling, Miles Mathis, and all of science has made is to assume that the polarity of the H2O molecule is a result of asymmetry (lopsidedness) in the arrangement of each H2O molecule's hydrogen atoms relative to its oxygen atom. In actuality, as I explain explicitly in my videos, the polarity of the H2O molecule is a result of the NET arrangement of electrical gradients RELATIVE TO NUCLEI. And any net arrangement of an H2O molecule's electrical gradients relative to nuclei is a result of both the electrical gradients generated by its own atoms and those generated by adjacent H2O molecules with which it shares hydrogen bonds (up to four). These additional electrical gradients always achieve a higher degree of balance (symmetry) in the net arrangement of electrical gradients relative to nuclei. Thus hydrogen bonds are the mechanism by which H2O dissolves its own polarity and breaking of hydrogen bonds is the mechanism by which H2O's ability to dissolve its own polarity is defeated.

Structural properties of H2O--such as surface tension and "surface tension on steroids" that is involved with vortices--emerges when the mechanism by which H2O's ability to dissolve its own polarity is partially defeated. The geometry of the surface of water is one such mechanism and the spinning of microdroplets along wind shear boundaries is another.

Chandler refuses to address or deal with details. His theory, as I understand it, is that tornadoes involve electricity, which is meaningless claim since all matter involves electricity. My theory too involves electricity, but the difference is that I provide details that explain the structural properties that are evident in tornadic vortices.

Thanks for the questions.

James McGinn / Genius
President of Solving Tornadoes

[jimmcginn]

Deep Dishonest About Water Has Rendered Meteorology Feckless

https://youtu.be/UsqG_CKWLFQ

The blatant dimwittedness of meteorology's convection model of storms has its roots in science's failure to correctly comprehend H2O

James McGinn / Genius
President of Solving Tornadoes

[jimmcginn]

Sympathy to those who are incredulous of the Spinning Nanodroplets of Vortice Plasma

https://anchor.fm/james-mcginn/episodes ... ma-e1ba4r3

James McGinn / Genius

[jimmcginn]

Meteorology is Inundated with Superstition

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMQAhTc0hYk

[jimmcginn]

How The Jetstream Maintains Its Momentum
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adYK3faR8yk

James McGinn / Genius

[jimmcginn]

Self Anointed Skeptics and Other Pretenders
https://youtu.be/P_FpsDC5aHg

[jimmcginn]

Meteorology's Achilles Heal
https://youtu.be/HeCMcVhoqi8

James McGinn / Genius