Pollack is very confused. As an expert on this subject (#1 In the world!) I can describe the conceptual error that Pollack is making. More significantly, I can describe this error from the perspective of the deeply flawed paradigm that is dominant in academia--something for which Pollack is naively unaware. And this results in Pollacks thinking serving to draw attention away from the public realizing how deeply flawed is the current paradigm.BipedalJoe wrote: ↑Mon Dec 28, 2020 10:43 pm What he (Pollack) has proven, though, is that water at surfaces is forced into a dense solid phase.
This phase, to be denser than water (the normal solid phase is not) ejects the protons that link the molecular ice sheets vertically.
First you have to understand how it is obvious to me that Pollack is confused. Pollack is confused because the current paradigm is bullshit and he doesn't get that. He is naive, gullible, just like the rest of the public and his efforts do nothing but bolster false confidence in the flawed thinking of the current paradigm. Let me explain. (Pay attention.) The current paradigm assumes that the H2O molecule is comparable to a permanent dipole magnet. A permanent dipole magnet would/could never have the low viscosity that we see in liquid water below the surface. So the assumption that H2O molecule is comparable to a permanent dipole magnet is, at best, only partially true. On the surface of bulk water we do see water molecules acting like a permanent dipole magnets. These observations are why we say liquid H2O has “surface tension.”
So, do you see Pollack's confusion? Pollack can't see that the emperor is naked. The people pushing the current paradigm have a model that is BLATANTLY CONTRADICTED by the most trivial of evidence--the low viscosity of liquid H2O. And Pollack doesn’t see this. Do you see it? If not, you need to slow down, remove your head from your lower orifice, and consider the implications of this. Think about it. The phonies pushing their "scientific" model are presenting a model that is BLATANTLY CONTRADICTED by the most trivial of evidence and Pollack is too dimwitted to notice it. So Pollack, in his confusion, puts forth a hypothesis that purports to explain what the current paradigm already explains--the structural properties of H2O--that are already explained by the fact that H2O is (mistakenly) considered (by the dopes pushing the current paradigm) to be a permanent dipole magnet. So, Pollacks poorly considered thinking on water does nothing but give people false confidence that the highly flawed thinking of the current paradigm isn't the shit storm that it actually is. Pollack is not accomplishing anything but diverting attention away from what is a deeply flawed paradigm. He is just adding to the confusion.
Pollack doesn’t realize that Linus Pauling made a huge error when he designated--way back in the 1950s--that the H2O molecule is comparable to a permanent dipole magnet. Pauling failed because he didn’t understand quantum mechanics. And this prevented him from realizing that although the H2O molecule is not a permanent dipole magnet but a highly variable dipole magnet, as I explain in my videos (see links to my paradigm busting videos below).
My theoretical improvements will be seen as one of the greatest breakthroughs in the history of science because it will allow us to recognize that elasticity of the H2O molecule as being the basis for the plasma of vortices that spin up on wind shear boundaries to thereby explain the physical processes of storms which are so poorly explained by the current joke called the convection model of storm theory.
The Mechanism of H2O Polarity Neutralization
https://youtu.be/bs73A9mSvQo
Why H2O Polarity is Variable
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KzkxdWWg3HU
James McGinn / Genius
