Ranzan's CMBR in the DSSU.

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?
crawler
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:33 pm

Ranzan's CMBR in the DSSU.

Unread post by crawler » Mon Apr 20, 2020 10:56 pm

Conrad Ranzan – 2009 – The cosmic background radiation in the DSSU.
http://www.cellularuniverse.org/CBR1inDSSU.pdf
Conrad Ranzan – 2014 – Cosmic redshift in the nonexpanding cellular universE.
http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.c ... 05.11.html

Ranzan explains the 3 k CMBR by using his redshift theory. A star's 5800 K radiation is reduced to 3 K with a wavelength of 1.9 mm (the predominant wavelength measured) when a photon crosses 133 billion LY (which is equivalent to 444 cosmic cells in the DSSU), if the photon extinction factor is 0.0045 per cell (ie if 45 out of each 1000 photons are captured by black holes)(each DSSU cell being about 300 million LY across).

I don’t believe in blackholes (certainly not silly singularity BHs), but i think that a supermassive star would annihilate photons anyhow.

Herouni showed that the CMBR is close to zero K (ie much less than 3 K), hencely Ranzan's extinction factor might need to be say 0.0100 instead of 0.0045.

Herouni in Armenia in 1988 using a 54 m dia hemispheric antenna measured a CMBR of 0.0 K for wavelength 8 mm (but this might have included down to 1 mm)(i cant remember)(i don't understand blackbody radiation). This was based on a self noise of 2.6 K & a cosmic reading of 2.6 K. If the CMBR was 2.7 K then the reading should have been 5.3 K. The self noise of 2.6 K gives a sensitivity miles better than the next best in thems days, but i don’t know about modern (ground based) detectors/antennas. So, the BB is a myth. And the CMB is a myth.

Herouni sent his findings to 8 eminent astronomers asking whether they could explain, but got no replies of any kind, so 10 years later Herouni published.

Dr Pierre-Marie Robitaille says that the so called CMBR is not cosmic, it is produced by water in Earth's oceans etc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8lKQMEYYLw

The CMBR near Earth is actually the Oceanic Microwave Foreground Radiation (OMFR).

The 3 K OMFR is (says Dr PMR) produced by the vibration of the weakest bonds found in the hexagonal units making Pollack's 4th phase of water (EZ water)(exclusion zone water), which forms at most interfaces (eg on the surface of an ocean)(droplets in a cloud). The strongest bonds in water give a 300 K radiation (says Dr PMR).

crawler
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: Ranzan's CMBR in the DSSU.

Unread post by crawler » Sat May 16, 2020 2:35 am

Wikileaks……….. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang ........
Inflation (cosmology) and Baryogenesis.
The earliest phases of the Big Bang are subject to much speculation, since astronomical data about them are not available. In the most common models the universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with a very high energy density and huge temperatures and pressures, and was very rapidly expanding and cooling. The period from 0 to 10^-43 seconds into the expansion, the Planck epoch, was a phase in which the four fundamental forces — the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, and the gravitational force, were unified as one.[22] In this stage, the universe was only about 10^−35 meters wide and consequently had a temperature of approximately 10^32 degrees Celsius.[23] The Planck epoch was succeeded by the grand unification epoch beginning at 10^-43 seconds, where gravitation separated from the other forces as the universe's temperature fell.[22] The universe was pure energy at this stage, too hot for any particles to be created.
At approximately 10^−37 seconds into the expansion, a phase transition caused a cosmic inflation, during which the universe grew exponentially, faster than the speed of light, and temperatures dropped by a factor of 100,000. Microscopic quantum fluctuations that occurred because of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle were amplified into the seeds that would later form the large-scale structure of the universe.[24] At a time around 10^-36 seconds, the Electroweak epoch begins when the strong nuclear force separates from the other forces, with only the electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force remaining unified.[25]
Inflation stopped at around the 10^−33 to 10^−32 seconds mark, with the universe's volume having increased by a factor of at least 10^78.
Reheating occurred until the universe obtained the temperatures required for the production of a quark–gluon plasma as well as all other elementary particles.[26][27] Temperatures were so high that the random motions of particles were at relativistic speeds, and particle–antiparticle pairs of all kinds were being continuously created and destroyed in collisions.[4] At some point, an unknown reaction called baryogenesis violated the conservation of baryon number, leading to a very small excess of quarks and leptons over antiquarks and antileptons—of the order of one part in 30 million. This resulted in the predominance of matter over antimatter in the present universe.[28]
Cooling.
The universe continued to decrease in density and fall in temperature, hence the typical energy of each particle was decreasing. Symmetry breaking phase transitions put the fundamental forces of physics and the parameters of elementary particles into their present form, with the electromagnetic force and weak nuclear force separating at about 10^−12 seconds.[25][29] After about 10^−11 seconds, the picture becomes less speculative, since particle energies drop to values that can be attained in particle accelerators. At about 10^−6 seconds, quarks and gluons combined to form baryons such as protons and neutrons. The small excess of quarks over antiquarks led to a small excess of baryons over antibaryons. The temperature was now no longer high enough to create new proton–antiproton pairs (similarly for neutrons–antineutrons), so a mass annihilation immediately followed, leaving just one in 1010 of the original protons and neutrons, and none of their antiparticles. A similar process happened at about 1 second for electrons and positrons. After these annihilations, the remaining protons, neutrons and electrons were no longer moving relativistically and the energy density of the universe was dominated by photons (with a minor contribution from neutrinos).
A few minutes into the expansion, when the temperature was about a billion kelvin and the density of matter in the universe was comparable to the current density of Earth's atmosphere, neutrons combined with protons to form the universe's deuterium and helium nuclei in a process called Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN).[30] Most protons remained uncombined as hydrogen nuclei.[31]
As the universe cooled, the rest energy density of matter came to gravitationally dominate that of the photon radiation. After about 379,000 years, the electrons and nuclei combined into atoms (mostly hydrogen), which were able to emit radiation. This relic radiation, which continued through space largely unimpeded, is known as the cosmic microwave background.[31]
The chemistry of life may have begun during a habitable epoch when the universe was only 10–17 million years old.[32][33]


So, wikileaks says that the standard model of the BB involves pure energy at the beginning ie before we have any photons or particles. What can their pure energy be?
I notice too that wiki is happy to have temperature before there are any photons or particles. How?
And wiki's explanation of the CMBR says that the photons were created after 379,000 years. But earlier they said that photons predominated after 1 second -- what happened to thems photons -- how come they are not in our CMBR?

When did their supposed Dark Matter happen?

crawler
Posts: 501
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: Ranzan's CMBR in the DSSU.

Unread post by crawler » Sat May 16, 2020 2:59 am

Sabine Hossenfelder – Dark matter or what? -- 14:27 -- Oct 31 2018 – 158,363 views 1152 comments. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FN2d2cmi_Gk
At 3:15 Sabine mentions the effect of DM on the CMBR. DM is responsible for the high peaks in the graphs of the CMB power spectrum which show up in modern measurements (COBE etc). Sabine says that DM accelerates the clumping of matter just after the BB thusly causing areas of greater temperature. Ordinary gravity supposedly is not strong enough to give such high peaks.

Sabine says that DM is transparent at all frequencies, & doesn't give off radiation, such radiation she says lessens clumping (due to radiation pressure i think). Sabine says that DM is some kind of unknown particle.

I don’t believe in DM, but confined neutrinos would do the trick, they would make dark particles that stuck together due to gravity rather than em. But i have fallen into a trap here, i should have said that the CMBR is more like 0.0 K. Or, more correctly, that the CMBR doesn't exist, the 3 K that we see is due mainly to water on Earth.

But in that case what is the cause of the lumpiness of the temperatures of the sky. Perhaps it is due to the clustering (alignment) of very far away galaxies.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests