Here’s an amazing invention …

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light? If you have a personal favorite theory, that is in someway related to the Electric Universe, this is where it can be posted.
BeAChooser
Posts: 1079
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 2:24 am

Here’s an amazing invention …

Unread post by BeAChooser » Sun Dec 03, 2023 4:40 pm

https://scitechdaily.com/the-particle-a ... m-science/
Researchers from The University of Texas at Austin, several national laboratories, European universities, and the Texas-based company TAU Systems Inc. have demonstrated a compact particle accelerator less than 20 meters long that produces an electron beam with an energy of 10 billion electron volts (10 GeV). There are only two other accelerators currently operating in the U.S. that can reach such high electron energies, but both are approximately 3 kilometers long.

“We can now reach those energies in 10 centimeters,” said Bjorn “Manuel” Hegelich, associate professor of physics at UT and CEO of TAU Systems, referring to the size of the chamber where the beam was produced. He is the senior author on a recent paper describing their achievement in the journal Matter and Radiation at Extremes.
Gee … and they did it without dark matter, dark energy, or any of the other gobbledegook gnomes that physics and astrophysics have pursued the last 50 years. In fact, as the article points out,
The concept of wakefield laser accelerators was first described in 1979. An extremely powerful laser strikes helium gas, heats it into a plasma, and creates waves that kick electrons from the gas out in a high-energy electron beam.

Imagine all the neat stuff we’d have if the mainstream hadn’t wasted billion and billions and billions on pursuing gnomes that won’t likely have ANY effect on the lives of the ordinary people living today but instead spent it investigating electromagnetism, plasma and nanotechnology.

Demosophist
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2022 10:09 pm

Re: Here’s an amazing invention …

Unread post by Demosophist » Mon Dec 04, 2023 1:13 am

BeAChooser wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2023 4:40 pm https://scitechdaily.com/the-particle-a ... m-science/
Researchers from The University of Texas at Austin, several national laboratories, European universities, and the Texas-based company TAU Systems Inc. have demonstrated a compact particle accelerator less than 20 meters long that produces an electron beam with an energy of 10 billion electron volts (10 GeV). There are only two other accelerators currently operating in the U.S. that can reach such high electron energies, but both are approximately 3 kilometers long.

“We can now reach those energies in 10 centimeters,” said Bjorn “Manuel” Hegelich, associate professor of physics at UT and CEO of TAU Systems, referring to the size of the chamber where the beam was produced. He is the senior author on a recent paper describing their achievement in the journal Matter and Radiation at Extremes.
Gee … and they did it without dark matter, dark energy, or any of the other gobbledegook gnomes that physics and astrophysics have pursued the last 50 years. In fact, as the article points out,
The concept of wakefield laser accelerators was first described in 1979. An extremely powerful laser strikes helium gas, heats it into a plasma, and creates waves that kick electrons from the gas out in a high-energy electron beam.

Imagine all the neat stuff we’d have if the mainstream hadn’t wasted billion and billions and billions on pursuing gnomes that won’t likely have ANY effect on the lives of the ordinary people living today but instead spent it investigating electromagnetism, plasma and nanotechnology.
My late instructor, Donald E. Kash was right. The real breakthroughs aren't created by theoretical physicists, but by engineers. The problem is that, in general Engineers don't write as well as theoretical physicists.

(See the post in my MH370 thread for the link, because I don't want to hijack yours.)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests