by crawler » Sat Jan 20, 2024 6:57 am
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2024 12:43 am
'The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic Solar System tests of general relativity. Radar signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by time dilation, which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer.[...]
Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculates the time delay of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equations.'- Wikipedia
And, just like Einstein, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, which require to take into consideration the index of refraction, which affects the speed of light and of radio waves (electro-magnetic waves in general), each time the wave enters a medium.
Which immediately shows that the radio wave will slow down when passing near a massive object, because of the atmosphere which surrounds the massive object, i.e. sun or planet, which causes the radio wave to refract and decrease its speed.
So, just like in the case of gravitational redshift, einsteinian pseudo-physicists have confused an effect produced by refraction with one of gravitation. Which proves once more that general relativity is an absurd pseudo-science based on a complete ignorance of classical physics and refraction.
This is just another example of how refraction is confused with gravitation by these so called scientists, who don't know basic refraction physics. They just have to know that v=c/n, where n is index of refraction, which is learned in highschool, and do the math (altough they need to know the exact indexes of refraction of the sun and planets, which I dont think any of them knows, since they don't even know the basics of refraction). Instead they use c everywhere, instead of v=c/n, and illogically 'prove' that time is slowed down by gravity, as predicted by general relativity. But all they prove is Einstein's prediction that
'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity'.
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/0 ... n.html?m=1
Notice that Shapiro used radar, but wiki says that Shapiro shows that light is slowed.
Light (ie photons) is not radar (ie radio waves).
They are two different animals.
If they are slowed by the same amount (when passing the Sun) then that is an accident.
This accidental slowing equivalence applies to simple refractional slowing, & it also applies to photaeno congestion slowing (Shapiro Delay)(my own theory explaining Shapiro Delay).
But at this point i need to explain that refraction of all kinds & slowing of all kinds are caused by the same thing (my photaeno congestion).
No, wait, i am wrong, there is a slowing that is due to the aetherwind being a tailwind or a headwind or a crosswind or some combination. Which is additional to pure Shapiro Delay.
So, we have c, & we have c', & we have c' + V etc.
[quote=mariuslvasile post_id=9698 time=1705711432 user_id=1000000342]
[i]'The Shapiro time delay effect, or gravitational time delay effect, is one of the four classic Solar System tests of general relativity. Radar signals passing near a massive object take slightly longer to travel to a target and longer to return than they would if the mass of the object were not present. The time delay is caused by time dilation, which increases the time it takes light to travel a given distance from the perspective of an outside observer.[...]
[u]Throughout this article discussing the time delay, Shapiro uses c as the speed of light and calculates the time delay[/u] of the passage of light waves or rays over finite coordinate distance according to a Schwarzschild solution to the Einstein field equations.[/i]'- Wikipedia
And, just like Einstein, completely ignores refraction. Which makes his whole calculation wrong, because he does not understand basic physics, which require to take into consideration the index of refraction, which affects the speed of light and of radio waves (electro-magnetic waves in general), each time the wave enters a medium.
Which immediately shows that the radio wave will slow down when passing near a massive object, because of the atmosphere which surrounds the massive object, i.e. sun or planet, which causes the radio wave to refract and decrease its speed.
So, just like in the case of gravitational redshift, einsteinian pseudo-physicists have confused an effect produced by refraction with one of gravitation. Which proves once more that general relativity is an absurd pseudo-science based on a complete ignorance of classical physics and refraction.
This is just another example of how refraction is confused with gravitation by these so called scientists, who don't know basic refraction physics. They just have to know that v=c/n, where n is index of refraction, which is learned in highschool, and do the math (altough they need to know the exact indexes of refraction of the sun and planets, which I dont think any of them knows, since they don't even know the basics of refraction). Instead they use c everywhere, instead of v=c/n, and illogically 'prove' that time is slowed down by gravity, as predicted by general relativity. But all they prove is Einstein's prediction that
[size=125][i][b]'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity'[/i][/b][/size].
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/01/gravitational-time-delay-time-dilation.html?m=1
[/quote]
Notice that Shapiro used radar, but wiki says that Shapiro shows that light is slowed.
Light (ie photons) is not radar (ie radio waves).
They are two different animals.
If they are slowed by the same amount (when passing the Sun) then that is an accident.
This accidental slowing equivalence applies to simple refractional slowing, & it also applies to photaeno congestion slowing (Shapiro Delay)(my own theory explaining Shapiro Delay).
But at this point i need to explain that refraction of all kinds & slowing of all kinds are caused by the same thing (my photaeno congestion).
No, wait, i am wrong, there is a slowing that is due to the aetherwind being a tailwind or a headwind or a crosswind or some combination. Which is additional to pure Shapiro Delay.
So, we have c, & we have c', & we have c' + V etc.