For discussion of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology. The ideas and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project™
Skip to content
by mariuslvasile » Fri Feb 16, 2024 2:23 pm
by crawler » Wed Jan 31, 2024 9:18 pm
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:25 am crawler wrote:Em radiation (eg radar) is not light, em radiation is not photons. Em radiation is radio waves. A ray pencil beam of light is made of photons. A laser wave is made of (or can be made of) a formation of photons. I am satisfied with Maxwell's theory of light as a sound wave in the aether. It is explained really well by Maxwell. I just don't see where this 'photon' fits in this wave equation, as all EM waves, from radio to gamma rays, are waves in the aether with different frequencies and wavelengths. Why would light waves be transmitted in the aether in a different manner, as 'quasi-particles', than the rest of the EM waves ? I dont get it.
crawler wrote:Em radiation (eg radar) is not light, em radiation is not photons. Em radiation is radio waves. A ray pencil beam of light is made of photons. A laser wave is made of (or can be made of) a formation of photons.
by mariuslvasile » Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:44 am
by mariuslvasile » Wed Jan 31, 2024 12:25 am
by crawler » Fri Jan 26, 2024 3:09 am
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:24 amA hole in the ether means a perfect vacuum. How is that a 'particle' ? Or it's a quasi-particle ok. But then you should not call it a photon, because that has nothing to do with Einstein's photon.
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:24 amHow do you explain refraction using photons ? And what photons are you talking about, Einstein's photons or yours ? Cause you use the term photon but refer to your own version of the photon, which is a bit confusing to say the least.
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:24 amActually, radio waves are light waves with a much longer wavelength and much lower frequency. And so are microwaves and infrared. Infrared light is still light, so is ultraviolet light, even if you cant see it directly with your eyes. But all EM radiation is a form of light. Even if we humans can only see a very small portion of it's spectrum, which ranges from radio waves to gamma rays. To give an analogy with sound, even if we cant hear ultrasounds they are still sound-waves. Other animals can hear them, and probably Batman can too.
by mariuslvasile » Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:24 am
by crawler » Thu Jan 25, 2024 7:39 pm
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:25 pmIt's funny that you say Einstein's dark age of science will be over soon, and yet you are defending his photon particle- which effectively removed the aether. Yes, Einstein did that. Because there is simply no need for a medium if light is a projectile like particle. Likewise, there simply is no need for photons if light is wave in a medium- the luminiferous aether. The light wave is explained as a disturbance in the aether medium, just like a sound wave is a disturbance in the air medium. In other words 'Light is a sound wave in the aether.' Nikola Tesla
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:25 pmRefraction is based on light waves, not on light particles (i.e. photons). Snell had no concept of 'photons' when he discovered the laws of refraction. Neither did Maxwell when he discovered the laws of electro-magnetic radiation. His light theory was based on the existence of luminiferous aether. And he calculated the speed of light as a sound wave in the aether. No photons what so ever.
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:25 pm'James Clerk Maxwell began working on Michael Faraday's lines of force. In his 1861 paper On Physical Lines of Force he modelled these magnetic lines of force using a sea of molecular vortices that he considered to be partly made of aether and partly made of ordinary matter. He derived expressions for the dielectric constant and the magnetic permeability in terms of the transverse elasticity and the density of this elastic medium. He then equated the ratio of the dielectric constant to the magnetic permeability with a suitably adapted version of Weber and Kohlrausch's result of 1856, and he substituted this result into Newton's equation for the speed of sound. On obtaining a value that was close to the speed of light as measured by Hippolyte Fizeau, Maxwell concluded that light consists in undulations of the same medium that is the cause of electric and magnetic phenomena.' https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether
by mariuslvasile » Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:25 pm
by crawler » Thu Jan 25, 2024 5:24 am
mariuslvasile wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:25 am 1. Photons don't have mass, so they can't be particles. 2. Photons don't have amplitude, so they can't be waves. 3. Photons don't have logic, so they can't be real. 4. Photons are virtually insane. https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/1 ... o.html?m=1
by mariuslvasile » Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:25 am
by crawler » Tue Jan 23, 2024 9:07 pm
balsysr wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:30 am As well as refraction around the vicinity of a star, it is also possible that refraction is occurring in the depths of space between galaxies. This is possible due to a weird form of matter that can form in a near vacuum (<1 particle per cc) at about 2 degree kelvin, composed completely of electrons. Einstein and someone else first published this possibility. For this to occur we need a source for the electrons. Galaxies of stars are a possibility as they produce masses of high speed electrons, and these being lighter, are likely to go further, than the heavier ions also ejected from solar coronas. Ultimately galaxies may have a slight excess positive charge with the electrons in the space between galaxies forming this physical lattice of electrons. A physical lattice is important as light passing through such a lattice will only be diffracted, not scattered. This means that the image formed from the light after diffraction is still sharp and clear, as is obvious in the real universe. This refraction would need to be accounted for when doing intergalactic distance calculations.
by mariuslvasile » Tue Jan 23, 2024 3:42 am
by balsysr » Tue Jan 23, 2024 3:38 am
by mariuslvasile » Tue Jan 23, 2024 3:23 am
balsysr wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:30 am As well as refraction around the vicinity of a star, it is also possible that refraction is occurring in the depths of space between galaxies. This is possible due to a weird form of matter that can form in a near vacuum (<1 particle per cc) at about 2 degree kelvin, composed completely of electrons. Einstein and someone else first published this possibility.
by balsysr » Mon Jan 22, 2024 5:30 am
Top