by Cognizant_Jon » Sun Oct 09, 2022 6:11 pm
This is a rather enlightening conversation. Great...because the Mossad agent just happen to have a great idea (again ludicrously short-termed for profits), we are stonewalled in the modern era. This would explain why my very thin book of Hannes Alfven "Cosmic Plasma" costs $169.99...
Pardon the tangent..I don't like it when good science is paywalled; especially when the real science could be un-paywalled to do two things:
1) Reduce absurd costs to levels the average person can afford (like medical innovations).
2) Educate the public on how events, actions, and causes really occur (like electric universe).
I am a science guy at heart for events on this side of existence (before death). I use science as a lens to figure out spiritual events mainstream science can't figure out (like ball lightening in nature). The good news is I am seeing personally relevant evidence that certain spiritual concepts are being scientifically tested with intent to debunk first, before considering concepts like ghosts existing or causing events.
For example, If on a security camera, a door appears to open and close of its own accord, it would be wise to first check the windows or other causes of the room the main door is meant to close off. If the windows are opened and the outside wind cause enough air pressure to push open the main door (that may have a loose lock) without assistance, you have discovered a potential cause.
Or by opening another door of the same room, the change in air pressure may be enough to open the main door without windows being present, you may have discovered another potential cause. I know you guys (and gals) are science driven, but for those Americans on this forum, I have been watching "Ghost Hunters" on the Discovery+ streaming service which is hosted by The Atlantic Paranormal Society ("TAPS").
That team uses deductive logic to, in every single case, look for non-magical & non-spiritual causes primarily; this includes Electro-Magnetic Fields that can cause nausea, severe anxiety, paranoia, etc, if they are severe enough. Personal note: I have been medically and mentally affected by EMF overload when I was in the US military on deployment. My symptoms fit the cause, and I do realize the potential logic errors by saying such.
My intent was not to derail this conversation,I am just using personal examples to relate to how paywalling science could have devastating consequences medically, especially for understanding and clarity. Had I known the science of EMF overload, and my doctors had known the same at the time I was diagnosed, it would have been clear that the high EMF military environment would have directly caused my condition.
My own personal medical situation is why I despise paywalls when trying the learn the science necessary for my wellbeing. I don't like paywalls anymore than all of you do. I don't like the current expression of peer-review either. You can thank EU Theories and Wal Thornhill for me learning about that issue as well. To which, I am immeasurably grateful for pointing out such foolish errors on those controlling the narrative in science.
I am also thanking everyone that responded to this conversation thread, especially for the Feynman tests for better peer-review. My science involves looking for non-spiritual & non-magical causes primarily, and exhaust those options first if the result cannot be easily debunked.
This is a rather enlightening conversation. Great...because the Mossad agent just happen to have a great idea (again ludicrously short-termed for profits), we are stonewalled in the modern era. This would explain why my very thin book of Hannes Alfven "Cosmic Plasma" costs $169.99...
Pardon the tangent..I don't like it when good science is paywalled; especially when the real science could be un-paywalled to do two things:
1) Reduce absurd costs to levels the average person can afford (like medical innovations).
2) Educate the public on how events, actions, and causes really occur (like electric universe).
I am a science guy at heart for events on this side of existence (before death). I use science as a lens to figure out spiritual events mainstream science can't figure out (like ball lightening in nature). The good news is I am seeing personally relevant evidence that certain spiritual concepts are being scientifically tested with intent to debunk first, before considering concepts like ghosts existing or causing events.
For example, If on a security camera, a door appears to open and close of its own accord, it would be wise to first check the windows or other causes of the room the main door is meant to close off. If the windows are opened and the outside wind cause enough air pressure to push open the main door (that may have a loose lock) without assistance, you have discovered a potential cause.
Or by opening another door of the same room, the change in air pressure may be enough to open the main door without windows being present, you may have discovered another potential cause. I know you guys (and gals) are science driven, but for those Americans on this forum, I have been watching "Ghost Hunters" on the Discovery+ streaming service which is hosted by The Atlantic Paranormal Society ("TAPS").
That team uses deductive logic to, in every single case, look for non-magical & non-spiritual causes primarily; this includes Electro-Magnetic Fields that can cause nausea, severe anxiety, paranoia, etc, if they are severe enough. Personal note: I have been medically and mentally affected by EMF overload when I was in the US military on deployment. My symptoms fit the cause, and I do realize the potential logic errors by saying such.
My intent was not to derail this conversation,I am just using personal examples to relate to how paywalling science could have devastating consequences medically, especially for understanding and clarity. Had I known the science of EMF overload, and my doctors had known the same at the time I was diagnosed, it would have been clear that the high EMF military environment would have directly caused my condition.
My own personal medical situation is why I despise paywalls when trying the learn the science necessary for my wellbeing. I don't like paywalls anymore than all of you do. I don't like the current expression of peer-review either. You can thank EU Theories and Wal Thornhill for me learning about that issue as well. To which, I am immeasurably grateful for pointing out such foolish errors on those controlling the narrative in science.
I am also thanking everyone that responded to this conversation thread, especially for the Feynman tests for better peer-review. My science involves looking for non-spiritual & non-magical causes primarily, and exhaust those options first if the result cannot be easily debunked.