For discussion of Electric Universe and Plasma Cosmology. The ideas and opinions expressed on this forum do not necessarily reflect those of T-Bolts Group Inc or The Thunderbolts Project™
Skip to content
by Lloyd » Sat Apr 27, 2024 9:25 pm
by nick c » Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:43 pm
Lloyd wrote:253486 Nick, do you want to h[ave a chronology discussion as I mentioned above at viewtopic.php?p=10325#p10323 ?
by Lloyd » Fri Apr 26, 2024 4:33 am
by nick c » Mon Apr 22, 2024 12:43 am
Lloyd wrote:The King’s Chamber in the Great Pyramid is known for a mysterious salt encrustation on its walls. This salt buildup was up to half an inch thick in places. The salt was also found along the Horizontal Passage and in the lower portion of the Grand Gallery. The origin of this salt buildup remains one of the greatest mysteries of the King’s Chamber1.
These limestones are of a grey-beige to yellow–brown colour, mostly compact but also porous in places, and they feel chalky due to marly components. Many of small-sized fossil remains are detectable but hard to identify. Occasionally, small nummulites up to 5 mm in length could be recognized at polished surfaces. During storage over a longer period, various salts effloresce at the surface, which can be washed off easily with the finger. With a hand lens, the fossils appear mostly as small nummulites, shells and other fossil remains, all irregularly imbedded and mostly secondarily calcified within the limestone matrix. The present study confirms that the building stones of the pyramids are natural rocks and were not formed by using artificial concrete.
by nick c » Sun Apr 21, 2024 9:49 pm
lloyd wrote:So, do you know if anyone has determined if the pyramid blocks contain fossils and other impurities? Shattered History seems to say they don't. I don't know what her sources are.
American Museum of Natural History wrote:Limestone is made of fossils. After small marine animals die, Their shells and skeletons build up on the ocean floor.... ...Sometimes the original shells which are now fossils are still visible.
by Lloyd » Sun Apr 21, 2024 3:32 pm
by Lloyd » Fri Apr 19, 2024 10:34 pm
by nick c » Sat Apr 13, 2024 1:55 am
The Ancient Architects video channel had some videos showing that Schoch was likely wrong in dating the Sphinx much older than the Pyramids. By the way, the Pyramids had casing stones on the exterior, which may have lessened erosion.
by Lloyd » Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:26 pm
by Lloyd » Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:07 pm
by Lloyd » Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:15 pm
by Lloyd » Sat Mar 16, 2024 9:59 pm
My model is based: - 1st on the oldest tree being about 4,700 years old, which must have grown after the Great Flood; - 2nd on several other features, like rivers etc being 5,000 or so years old, as per Jonathan Gray's writing, also which must have formed after the Great Flood; - 3rd on the Septuagint Bible stating that the Great Flood occurred c. 5,300 years ago, which event deposited nearly all sedimentary rock strata; - 4th on Michael Oard's finding that the Ice Age lasted only c. 700 years after the Flood and that the Ice Age occurred on top of the sedimentary strata deposited by the Flood; - 5th on the Younger Dryas impacts having occurred near the end of the Ice Age, which destroyed most megafauna; - 6th on iridium-microspherule layers being possibly caused by Saturn novas during the Great Flood and the Younger Dryas event; - 7th on the Saturn Golden Age having started after the last nova, i.e. after the Younger Dryas; - 8th on Moe Mandelkehr's finding of a catastrophe 4,300 years ago, which ended the Golden Age and which I suspect was due to the Indian Ocean Burckle Crater impact event; - 9th on pyramids and ziggurats etc having been likely built after the Golden Age in commemoration of the Saturn Configuration; - 10th on the Dead Sea event having been dated by David Rohl to 1830 BC, which I suspect was the end of the Jupiter Age, which started after the Golden Age; - 11th on the Exodus having been dated by David Rohl to c. 1446 BC, which involved a large comet, but probably not Venus - 12fth on David Rohl's dating of subsequent events. {SHORT GOLDEN AGE & JUPITER AGE} By this model, the Golden Age only lasted 300 years from 2,600 to 2,300 BC and the Jupiter Age 470 years from 2,300 to 1,830 BC and it's possible that Venus and Mars, as well as Jupiter, were still in close proximity to Earth in 1830 BC. Cardona had an article in Kronos, I think, called Jupiter, God of Abraham, which gave evidence that the Sodom and Gomorrah disaster by the Dead Sea was caused by brimstone that came from Io, a large moon of Jupiter. I think Cardona later abandoned that idea, but I still find it plausible. It may be that Jupiter was on an elliptical orbit then which brought it close to Earth on occasion, or it may have still been in the remains of the Saturn Train of planets. {EXODUS COMET} I suspect that Venus was not the comet of the Exodus, because Cardona said he found no evidence that anyone who talked about the comet of the Exodus ever called it Venus. Even in Worlds in Collision it seems no one was sited as saying the comet was Venus. And surely by that late date everyone at that time was well familiar with Venus as a planet, no longer as a comet. It's not settled science, of course, though. I guess the myths of the Americas provide clues that Venus could have been seen as a comet as late as the time of the Exodus, but it's odd that no one in the eastern hemisphere seems to have called the Exodus comet Venus. So it seems unlikely that the Exodus comet was Venus and it's more unlikely that Mars encountered the Earth c. 700 BC. I can quote from some Aeon articles etc about this later, if needed.
by Lloyd » Tue Feb 20, 2024 6:11 am
by Lloyd » Tue Feb 20, 2024 3:35 am
Nick said: In my opinion the Pyramids were built long after there was any {major} flooding.... If there were any marine encrustations found on the Pyramids (and I don't know that there were, sources?) it is possible that those deposits were on the stones before they were put into the Pyramid structure. There is no question about the source of the Pyramid stones, the quarries still exist today, and the stones are easily matched to those quarries. I think it is amazing that the Aswan Granite was transported almost 700 miles via Nile river boats to Giza. These stones ranged from 2 to 80 tons in weight.
Nick said: Ginenthal in Pillars of the Past cites the work of Dr, Schoch, a Boston University geologist, who determined that the Pyramids show no signs of water erosion, but only have aeolic (wind) erosion. In contrast, Schoch demonstrated that Sphinx and its related temple do show signs of water erosion, probably from torrential rains, which indicates that the Sphinx is much older than the Pyramids and was constructed before the Sahara desert was formed and the climate at Giza was very different than the time of Pyramid construction. Note that mainstream Egyptology does not dispute the absence of water erosion on the Pyramids and its presence on the Sphinx but rather opt for the lame explanation that Sphinx' and its temple's water erosion was the result of water percolating up from the water table beneath. The problem with this is why did this process selectively affect the Sphinx and its temple? and yet the Pyramids and their associated buildings did not suffer erosion from the same process?
by nick c » Sun Feb 18, 2024 5:38 pm
Lloyd wrote:So, do you know if anyone has determined if the pyramid blocks contain fossils and other impurities? Shattered History seems to say they don't. I don't know what her sources are.
Top