Thunderbolts Forum v3.0

Harry wrote: ↑Sat May 28, 2022 5:47 am https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//fu ... 7.000.html

The idea that jets are created by in-falling matter maybe one theory. This theory will not be able to create a stable jet that will last for hundreds and thousands of light years. Not only that, to expel stars along a stable jet eg M87. And be part of a dipolar electromagnetic vector field jet.

Another Theory
A core with extreme compaction over 10^25
Chiral Supersymmetry.
Creating a dipolar electromagnetic fields that expel matter
The core attraction fields creating an Event Horizon
It’s all electrical
Sounds like a cyclic theory

True, but at least there's some infighting amongst the gn ... er ... mainstream proponents.

nick c wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 2:09 am Dr. Cisneros is replacing Dark Matter with Dark Energy. Whatever, it is still "dark".

Dr. Cisneros, however, has created a different model that can account for the differences seen in observations, without adding mass to the system. Instead, a combination of galactic lensing effects as well as a difference in local dark energy bubble back ground energy constants, can be used to align the mathematical models and physical observations.

<bold added>

Using Mathematical Modeling Of Galaxies To Disprove The Existence Of Dark Matter. The purpose of this research is exploring an alternative model to disprove the need for dark matter in current cosmological models of galaxy rotation curves. … snip … The results produced from this model have been extremely promising so far, and have effectively explained the problem seen in galaxy rotational curve observations.