by GaryN » Sun Mar 06, 2022 3:58 am
I enjoyed watching Mel Acheson: Playing with New Thinking and then the two videos by Ghada Chehade, but wonder if the EU/TB teams can ever question the very basis of the present cosmological model, and that of course is the nature of our own Sun. I am just astounded at the resistance of both camps to admit that everything is based on an unquestionable ASSUMPTION that the Sun is a hot, bright ball of fusing hydrogen. If this could be shown wrong then it likely means that all those objects we see in the night sky are not stars at all, and the whole house of cards collapses. There is no empirical evidence to support the bright, hot sun model, and neither camp can show me otherwise.
Of course I am in the EU camp, but now am incorporating the metaphysical aspects of the Sun and have found a few spiritual advocates who agree with the non-visible Sun model. David Icke is one, which of course could be seen as a bad thing, but he has quite a large following. Then there is Eric Dollard, an electrical engineer who I believe is very qualified to speak on the subject. Love to see him and Don Scott in a tete-a-tete.
If the Sun is not what we are told then of course it must mean there is a very large conspiracy afoot, as none of the space capable nations have ever come forward with this knowledge, but none have shown us any photos of the Sun from space using the same type of equipment that we would use from Earth, and also use Sun sensors in their missions that CREATE coherent near-infrared photons using a grating. The sensor is most efficient at this wavelength. Deep space Sun sensors do NOT utilise visible light.
Maybe the EU needs to get spiritual minded?
New Thought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Thought
I enjoyed watching Mel Acheson: Playing with New Thinking and then the two videos by Ghada Chehade, but wonder if the EU/TB teams can ever question the very basis of the present cosmological model, and that of course is the nature of our own Sun. I am just astounded at the resistance of both camps to admit that everything is based on an unquestionable ASSUMPTION that the Sun is a hot, bright ball of fusing hydrogen. If this could be shown wrong then it likely means that all those objects we see in the night sky are not stars at all, and the whole house of cards collapses. There is no empirical evidence to support the bright, hot sun model, and neither camp can show me otherwise.
Of course I am in the EU camp, but now am incorporating the metaphysical aspects of the Sun and have found a few spiritual advocates who agree with the non-visible Sun model. David Icke is one, which of course could be seen as a bad thing, but he has quite a large following. Then there is Eric Dollard, an electrical engineer who I believe is very qualified to speak on the subject. Love to see him and Don Scott in a tete-a-tete.
If the Sun is not what we are told then of course it must mean there is a very large conspiracy afoot, as none of the space capable nations have ever come forward with this knowledge, but none have shown us any photos of the Sun from space using the same type of equipment that we would use from Earth, and also use Sun sensors in their missions that CREATE coherent near-infrared photons using a grating. The sensor is most efficient at this wavelength. Deep space Sun sensors do NOT utilise visible light.
Maybe the EU needs to get spiritual minded?
New Thought.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Thought