by crawler » Tue Jan 12, 2021 9:18 pm
D_Archer wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 10:44 am
toni wrote: ↑Tue Jan 12, 2021 2:58 am
We can look into the rotation of the planet in 2 ways:
First by observation. The planet closest to our sun has 1400 hours a day. The one furthest from the sun is 16 earth hours a day. The reason for this is that the further the planet is from its mother star, it slowly increases rotation around the axis and decreases rotation around the star.
Second, we must know how electricity works. Planets grow to a perfect sphere and then disintegration starts. Poles start to flatten and the equatorial area starts to expand. In the same time, activity in the equatorial area increases and we know this by the moons around the planets which are further away. A good example would be Jupiter and its size. Most likely Jupiter didn't grow to this size but expanded with the pressures from inside. When we see the difference in the hours of the first and last planets, we don't have to be surprised that the earth's rotation is going to change. When we know how gravitation and radiation cycles work, then it is easy to see nature's wonders.
Best Regards,Toni
That is all fine, but those are active/dynamic variables, there can always be slight changes up and down, in rotation, in cooling/warming.
But you can not say the rotation of the earth is speeding up when it is simply not true overall (time).
Regards,Daniel
There is no such thing as time, except for the present instant, which is universal.
All we have is ticking, ie the ticking of processes, including clocks & orbits & chemistry & biology etc.
(A) Therefore time is ticking, & ticking must be related to a nominated process, every process being different ticking wise.
And, that one process will depend on location etc, ie the ticking will be different in different locations no matter how perfect the instrument.
And at any one location the ticking rate will change during time (eg during a day, year etc).
If we know what affects ticking we can use any clock to give a good measure of uniform time. But we dont know. Hence it makes it difficult to say which clock is more correct, or at least exactly how correct.
The key is that we need a good measure of uniform time, ie raw time corrected for uncontrollable variables.
This will require knowledge of (1) aether (& in particular aetherwind & the acceleration of the wind), (2) photaenos (a part of every photon)(which slow light & electric forces near mass), (3) the centrifuging of aether (adding to aetherwind, & adding to the acceleration of the wind), (4) relativistic effects (affecting our understanding & measure of true ticking & apparent ticking etc), (5) lots of other stuff.
If we do a perfect job then we can ignore requirement
(A).
[quote=D_Archer post_id=4292 time=1610448249 user_id=1847]
[quote=toni post_id=4291 time=1610420331 user_id=29812]
We can look into the rotation of the planet in 2 ways:
First by observation. The planet closest to our sun has 1400 hours a day. The one furthest from the sun is 16 earth hours a day. The reason for this is that the further the planet is from its mother star, it slowly increases rotation around the axis and decreases rotation around the star.
Second, we must know how electricity works. Planets grow to a perfect sphere and then disintegration starts. Poles start to flatten and the equatorial area starts to expand. In the same time, activity in the equatorial area increases and we know this by the moons around the planets which are further away. A good example would be Jupiter and its size. Most likely Jupiter didn't grow to this size but expanded with the pressures from inside. When we see the difference in the hours of the first and last planets, we don't have to be surprised that the earth's rotation is going to change. When we know how gravitation and radiation cycles work, then it is easy to see nature's wonders.
Best Regards,Toni[/quote]That is all fine, but those are active/dynamic variables, there can always be slight changes up and down, in rotation, in cooling/warming.
But you can not say the rotation of the earth is speeding up when it is simply not true overall (time).
Regards,Daniel[/quote]
There is no such thing as time, except for the present instant, which is universal.
All we have is ticking, ie the ticking of processes, including clocks & orbits & chemistry & biology etc.
[b][color=#BF0000](A)[/color][/b] Therefore time is ticking, & ticking must be related to a nominated process, every process being different ticking wise.
And, that one process will depend on location etc, ie the ticking will be different in different locations no matter how perfect the instrument.
And at any one location the ticking rate will change during time (eg during a day, year etc).
If we know what affects ticking we can use any clock to give a good measure of uniform time. But we dont know. Hence it makes it difficult to say which clock is more correct, or at least exactly how correct.
[u][color=#0000BF]The key is that we need a good measure of uniform time, ie raw time corrected for uncontrollable variables.
[/color][/u]
This will require knowledge of (1) aether (& in particular aetherwind & the acceleration of the wind), (2) photaenos (a part of every photon)(which slow light & electric forces near mass), (3) the centrifuging of aether (adding to aetherwind, & adding to the acceleration of the wind), (4) relativistic effects (affecting our understanding & measure of true ticking & apparent ticking etc), (5) lots of other stuff.
If we do a perfect job then we can ignore requirement [b][color=#BF0000](A)[/color][/b].