by Michael Mozina » Mon Jan 11, 2021 6:24 pm
D_Archer wrote: ↑Sun Jan 10, 2021 9:38 am
Michael Mozina wrote: ↑Sat Jan 09, 2021 6:04 pm it is possible that it's simply a more dense and thicker layer of plasma.
My contention at the time was that the wave was caused by a seismic or flare event which occurred *under* the photosphere. I'm pleased to see that there is now evidence to support my position.
Yes, it is just that, dense plasma, or because of pressure, plasma that behaves like a solid.
Yes, under the photosphere, just like underground lightning, that is also where Earthquakes on Earth start. So Sunquakes are analogues, just a different scale, energy (phase state).
Probably :-0
Regards,
Daniel
I think it's noteworthy that the discovery of the cause of the event occurring *under* the photosphere rather than above it pretty much eliminates the mainstream 'explanation' of sunquakes. One the other hand, it's perfectly congruent with the existence of the electrode surface sitting *under* the photosphere, and being made of a more dense material than the photosphere. That's also completely consistent with all the SDO and other satellite images of the sun. It's quite clear from the SDO satellite images that the electrode surface *has* to be located under the photosphere, and "discharges" can therefore occur *under* the photosphere as well as above it.
Virtually everything about the mainstream solar model is FUBAR. None of it adds up. Magnetic reconnection does not explain nor can it simulate a full sphere solar corona, or a sustained planetary aurora in an actual laboratory experiment. On the other hand, Birkeland's 'electric sun" model sustains a full sphere hot corona above a cooler surface in the lab, as well as a sustained planetary aurora.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m58-CfVrsN4
All of the basic features of the solar atmosphere are *easily* simulated in the lab with an electric sun model and circuit theory. That experiment above cost less than 20K. To this day the mainstream cannot so much as simulate a *sustained* planetary aurora based on 'magnetic reconnection" in a real lab experiment, let alone a full sphere corona, solar wind, etc.
[quote=D_Archer post_id=4255 time=1610271503 user_id=1847]
[quote="Michael Mozina" post_id=4248 time=1610215464 user_id=8376] it is possible that it's simply a more dense and thicker layer of plasma.
My contention at the time was that the wave was caused by a seismic or flare event which occurred *under* the photosphere. I'm pleased to see that there is now evidence to support my position.
[/quote]
Yes, it is just that, dense plasma, or because of pressure, plasma that behaves like a solid.
Yes, under the photosphere, just like underground lightning, that is also where Earthquakes on Earth start. So Sunquakes are analogues, just a different scale, energy (phase state).
Probably :-0
Regards,
Daniel
[/quote]
I think it's noteworthy that the discovery of the cause of the event occurring *under* the photosphere rather than above it pretty much eliminates the mainstream 'explanation' of sunquakes. One the other hand, it's perfectly congruent with the existence of the electrode surface sitting *under* the photosphere, and being made of a more dense material than the photosphere. That's also completely consistent with all the SDO and other satellite images of the sun. It's quite clear from the SDO satellite images that the electrode surface *has* to be located under the photosphere, and "discharges" can therefore occur *under* the photosphere as well as above it.
Virtually everything about the mainstream solar model is FUBAR. None of it adds up. Magnetic reconnection does not explain nor can it simulate a full sphere solar corona, or a sustained planetary aurora in an actual laboratory experiment. On the other hand, Birkeland's 'electric sun" model sustains a full sphere hot corona above a cooler surface in the lab, as well as a sustained planetary aurora.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m58-CfVrsN4
All of the basic features of the solar atmosphere are *easily* simulated in the lab with an electric sun model and circuit theory. That experiment above cost less than 20K. To this day the mainstream cannot so much as simulate a *sustained* planetary aurora based on 'magnetic reconnection" in a real lab experiment, let alone a full sphere corona, solar wind, etc.