by mariuslvasile » Wed Feb 28, 2024 1:49 am
The Doppler effect for sound is calculated using a set of equations, which differ for moving source and for moving observer. This is because of the preffered frame of reference which is given by the stationary air medium in which sound travels.
Since the motion of observer and source is relative to this preffered frame of reference, the equation for moving source and stationary observer is not the same as the one for moving observer and stationary source. So the resulting Doppler shift will be different in each case, i.e. the perceived frequencies will NOT be the same.
In the case of light, there is no such preferred frame of reference, because Eistein removed the medium for light waves, which somehow became particles over night, and the equation is basically the same for moving source and moving observer. So the Doppler shift is the same for both cases, i.e. the frequencies will be shifted exactly the same amount.
But as far as I know, no one actually verified if this actually happens, and that the frenquencies actually match. Which is not really scientific, to say the least. So I will experimentally prove that they don't match, because aether exists and Einstein's photon doesn't -which I have already proved here:
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/1 ... o.html?m=1
The experiment which I propose is very simple: we send a laser beam from a stationary source to a moving observer (receiver), and then from a moving source to a stationary observer (receiver), while using the same speed for both movements. We compare the frequencies, and if the frequencies received coincide, then there is no preferred frame of reference and aether does not exist, just like Einstein said. If they don't coincide, then there is a preferred frame of refrence and aether exists, just like Maxwell, Fizeau, Lorentz, Tesla, Huygens, and most scientists before Einstein said. (Actually some even proved it, like Maxwell who calculated the correct speed of light in aether using Newtons equation for speed of sound and applying it to the aether medium)
And when I say very simple, it's actually not that simple in practice because the devices used to measure the frequency of light (spectrum interferometers) are very big and hard to move. And the ones which are smaller, like Fabry-Perot interferometer, are not exactly accurate.
But maybe we can use a gamma ray instead like Pound and Rebka did, and a metal target of the same fancy metal (Iron57) they used which will allow us to detect if the shifted frequencies are the same in both cases. So we setup the experiment in a way that the gammaray emitted from a moving source gets absorbed by the stationary metal target and does not reach to the (also stationary) detector (or observer) after it is Doppler shifted. Then, in the second part of the experiment, when the source is stationary, and the metal target and detector/observer are moving, we should get the same absorbing result if aether does not exist. But if the gammaray passes through the metal target, into the detector, then aether exists and this disproves Einstein once and for all. Actually twice because I've disproved his general relativity already.
But, since special relativity is a special case of general relativity, I have also disproved it by disproving general relativity. But now I shall disprove SR experimentally too, not just by means of logical deduction. Altough experiments are also based on logical deductions, or illogical deductions in the case of Einstein's thought experiments and lack of thought experiments performed by Pound-Rebka and other pseudo-scientists, like Shapiro effect, which allegedely proved general relativity, by making the same basic mistake of ignoring refraction. Which the Vasile effect has used with great succes to disprove pretty much all of their general relative experiments.
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/0 ... t.html?m=1
The Doppler effect for sound is calculated using a set of equations, which differ for moving source and for moving observer. This is because of the preffered frame of reference which is given by the stationary air medium in which sound travels.
Since the motion of observer and source is relative to this preffered frame of reference, the equation for moving source and stationary observer is not the same as the one for moving observer and stationary source. So the resulting Doppler shift will be different in each case, i.e. the perceived frequencies will NOT be the same.
In the case of light, there is no such preferred frame of reference, because Eistein removed the medium for light waves, which somehow became particles over night, and the equation is basically the same for moving source and moving observer. So the Doppler shift is the same for both cases, i.e. the frequencies will be shifted exactly the same amount.
But as far as I know, no one actually verified if this actually happens, and that the frenquencies actually match. Which is not really scientific, to say the least. So I will experimentally prove that they don't match, because aether exists and Einstein's photon doesn't -which I have already proved here:[url]https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2023/12/why-einsteins-photon-is-pseudo.html?m=1[/url]
The experiment which I propose is very simple: we send a laser beam from a stationary source to a moving observer (receiver), and then from a moving source to a stationary observer (receiver), while using the same speed for both movements. We compare the frequencies, and if the frequencies received coincide, then there is no preferred frame of reference and aether does not exist, just like Einstein said. If they don't coincide, then there is a preferred frame of refrence and aether exists, just like Maxwell, Fizeau, Lorentz, Tesla, Huygens, and most scientists before Einstein said. (Actually some even proved it, like Maxwell who calculated the correct speed of light in aether using Newtons equation for speed of sound and applying it to the aether medium)
And when I say very simple, it's actually not that simple in practice because the devices used to measure the frequency of light (spectrum interferometers) are very big and hard to move. And the ones which are smaller, like Fabry-Perot interferometer, are not exactly accurate.
But maybe we can use a gamma ray instead like Pound and Rebka did, and a metal target of the same fancy metal (Iron57) they used which will allow us to detect if the shifted frequencies are the same in both cases. So we setup the experiment in a way that the gammaray emitted from a moving source gets absorbed by the stationary metal target and does not reach to the (also stationary) detector (or observer) after it is Doppler shifted. Then, in the second part of the experiment, when the source is stationary, and the metal target and detector/observer are moving, we should get the same absorbing result if aether does not exist. But if the gammaray passes through the metal target, into the detector, then aether exists and this disproves Einstein once and for all. Actually twice because I've disproved his general relativity already.
But, since special relativity is a special case of general relativity, I have also disproved it by disproving general relativity. But now I shall disprove SR experimentally too, not just by means of logical deduction. Altough experiments are also based on logical deductions, or illogical deductions in the case of Einstein's thought experiments and lack of thought experiments performed by Pound-Rebka and other pseudo-scientists, like Shapiro effect, which allegedely proved general relativity, by making the same basic mistake of ignoring refraction. Which the Vasile effect has used with great succes to disprove pretty much all of their general relative experiments.
https://vasileffect.blogspot.com/2024/02/testing-aether-using-doppler-effect.html?m=1