by Demosophist » Wed Dec 07, 2022 10:20 am
However, he's so caught up in his spaceman interpretation that he doesn't realize that's what he's done. He suggests that the term applies to one who commands, and is characterized as an eye with a shepherd's crook. He reasons, therefore, that it's a reference to some ET anthropomorphic dude who is the commander of the Elohim.
Sometimes I wish people like Mauro and Graham Hancock would just watch one of Dave Talbott's discourses and snap out of it. But they really have too much invested in their own schtick to do that. Anyway, here's Mauro making his space invader case:
https://rumble.com/v1dessh-elyon-the-co ... and-m.html
However, he's so caught up in his spaceman interpretation that he doesn't realize that's what he's done. He suggests that the term applies to one who commands, and is characterized as an eye with a shepherd's crook. He reasons, therefore, that it's a reference to some ET anthropomorphic dude who is the commander of the Elohim.
Sometimes I wish people like Mauro and Graham Hancock would just watch one of Dave Talbott's discourses and snap out of it. But they really have too much invested in their own schtick to do that. Anyway, here's Mauro making his space invader case:
https://rumble.com/v1dessh-elyon-the-commander-of-the-elohim-this-information-is-key-paul-wallis-and-m.html