by Shoulder_of_Orion » Sun Mar 26, 2023 3:56 pm
Hello everyone,
I saw Thunderbolts' video "Gareth Samuel: Seeing Precession Differently | Space News" yesterday and I have a question about the star Sirius.
In this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdLxP-w1LGg Gareth talks about problems with current model of precession and problem number 3 (which starts at 6:50 in the video) is about Sirius not moving with other stars. My question is: Is this a fact? If so, how is that possible?
I might have missed some exposure of an error of mainstream astronomy, because until yesterday I thought all the stars are moving about 1 degree every seventy years (relative to the equinox). For example, in the Stellarium software, Sirius moves like the other stars.
If the star is not moving, that mean Canis major constellation is slowly but significantly deformed by stationary Sirius over time. Wouldn't this be provable beyond all doubt? Thanks for the opinions and help.
Hello everyone,
I saw Thunderbolts' video "Gareth Samuel: Seeing Precession Differently | Space News" yesterday and I have a question about the star Sirius.
In this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdLxP-w1LGg Gareth talks about problems with current model of precession and problem number 3 (which starts at 6:50 in the video) is about Sirius not moving with other stars. My question is: Is this a fact? If so, how is that possible?
I might have missed some exposure of an error of mainstream astronomy, because until yesterday I thought all the stars are moving about 1 degree every seventy years (relative to the equinox). For example, in the Stellarium software, Sirius moves like the other stars.
If the star is not moving, that mean Canis major constellation is slowly but significantly deformed by stationary Sirius over time. Wouldn't this be provable beyond all doubt? Thanks for the opinions and help.