Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

Post a reply


This question is a means of preventing automated form submissions by spambots.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :arrow: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Robertus Maximus » Tue Jan 23, 2024 11:35 pm

Galaxy formation in a pickle

From Sky and Telescope, we find some 650 million years after the imaginary Big Bang: 'Faraway dwarf galaxies in the universe’s distant past — which will become modern Milky Ways — have an unexpectedly stretched-out appearance.'

https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-n ... ke-pickle/

"The difficulty now will be in understanding what the shapes of these galaxies are telling us about galactic evolution over cosmic time. “I do think interpretation is going to be extremely hard,” Cowie says."

The "interpretation" will be extremely hard if the authors of the study are unaware of the plasma/electric model of galaxy formation via interacting Birkeland currents.

We only have to look here to see the galactic zoo interacting Birkeland currents can produce: https://plasmauniverse.info/galaxy.Peculiar.html

The "interpretation" is exceedingly simple.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Roshi » Thu Dec 29, 2022 11:12 am

Did some searches. Found out the explanation for dark matter not clumping together is "it does not interact electromagnetically", meaning it cannot bump into itself like ordinary matter (and lose energy in the process). Ok...

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by jacmac » Sun Dec 25, 2022 5:05 pm

O no, instant karma strikes again.
From this article from Lloyds's list
https://phys.org/news/2022-12-cosmologi ... axies.html

Apparently dark matter should clump.
The Milky Way's satellites seem to be arranged in an implausibly thin plane piercing through the galaxy and, oddly, they are also circling in a coherent and long-lived disk.
The "plane of satellites".
There is no known physical mechanism that would make satellites planes. Instead, it was thought that satellite galaxies should be arranged in a roughly round configuration tracing the dark matter.
The fact that the arrangement of satellites could not be explained led researchers to think that the cold dark matter theory of galaxy formation might be wrong.
Who knew there was doubt, that dark matter should clump !?
But now computer models to the rescue.
However, this latest research saw astronomers use new data from the European Space Agency's Gaia space observatory.
These data allowed scientists to project the orbits of the satellite galaxies into the past and future and see the plane form and dissolve in a few hundred million years—a mere blink of an eye in cosmic time.
they found several virtual Milky Ways which boast a plane of satellite galaxies very similar to the one seen through telescopes.
Study co-author Professor Carlos Frenk, Ogden Professor of Fundamental Physics in the Institute for Computational Cosmology, at Durham University, U.K., said, "The strange alignment of the Milky Way's satellite galaxies in the sky had perplexed astronomers for decades, so much so that it was deemed to pose a profound challenge to cosmological orthodoxy.
"But thanks to the amazing data from the Gaia satellite and the laws of physics, we now know that the plane is just a chance alignment, a matter of being in the right place at the right time, just as the constellations of stars in the sky.
Random chance to the rescue. :D
I wonder if they will risk looking for other "plane of satellites" around other galaxies ?

The galaxies are electric; as Robertus Maximus says !
Jack

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by jacmac » Sun Dec 25, 2022 3:27 pm

ONE WAY GRAVITY ! :shock:
Excellent point Roshi.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Roshi » Sun Dec 25, 2022 8:32 am

BeAChooser wrote: Sat Dec 24, 2022 8:24 pm
From the article:
Galactic and extragalactic filaments are produced in totally different environments, namely, the nucleus of a normal galaxy and the intracluster medium. Their length scales, energy densities, and other characteristic parameters differ by orders of magnitude. In spite of these differences, we argue that similar processes operate in both systems motivated by their similar morphology and the similar dimensionless ratios of their physical parameters.
This affirmation is amazing. Similar processes inside and outside galaxies. What could those be? What does mainstream currently say about intergalactic space?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space

I asked a question in another thread. There is this page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
which contains a picture (from ESO) with the following text under it:
This artist's impression shows the expected distribution of dark matter in the Milky Way galaxy as a blue halo of material surrounding the galaxy.
So dark matter applies gravitational force to normal matter, but not to itself, that's why it does not clump together like normal matter, and just stays there like a "halo", where it's needed?
Let's not forget, mainstream says gravity is in fact "bent space time". This dark stuff bends space and time for normal matter, but not for itself. Amazing, and most useful.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by BeAChooser » Sat Dec 24, 2022 8:24 pm

The authors of this paper can’t see beyond the end of their noses. In their conclusions they suggest the filaments either “arise through the stretching and collection of field lines by turbulence in a weakly magnetized medium” or “by the collection and draping of field lines by a moving stellar wind source or" some other "obstacle in the medium". Everything else about the filaments and particles they create is still “to be established” or “unclear”. Maybe this nonsense and their continued lack of understanding is all because they ignore the words “electromagnetism” and “current”. You think?

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Robertus Maximus » Sat Dec 24, 2022 12:45 pm

Magnetized radio filaments

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3 ... 213/ac982a

https://gleamoscope.icrar.org/gleamoscope/trunk/src/

https://www.sarao.ac.za/media-releases/ ... milky-way/

"Magnetized radio filaments are found in abundance in the inner few hundred parsecs of our galaxy. Progress in understanding this population of filaments has been slow over the last few decades, in part due to a lack of detection elsewhere in the galaxy or in external galaxies. Recent highly sensitive radio continuum observations of radio galaxies in galaxy clusters have revealed remarkable isolated filamentary structures in the intracluster medium (ICM) that are linked to radio jets, tails, and lobes. The origin of this class of filaments is not understood either. Here, we argue that the underlying physical mechanisms responsible for the creation of the two populations are the same because of their similarities in morphology, spacing between the filaments, aspect ratio, and magnetic energy densities to the thermal pressure of the medium and that both populations have undergone synchrotron aging." (my emphasis)

"In spite of decades of studying the GC (galactic centre) filaments, a good understanding of these structures is still lacking. The emerging population of extragalactic radio filaments appears to have remarkably similar properties to the radio filaments in the GC." (my emphasis)

"We compared the two populations of magnetized filaments in the GC and ICM. They differ vastly in their physical properties, such as lengths, widths, and magnetic field strengths. However, we argued that, nevertheless, they are analogous to each other as might be anticipated based on their similar morphologies." (my emphasis)

"The striking similarities between these enigmatic populations, despite their very different environments, suggest the possibility that one or the other may be amenable to observational probes that shed light on the physical processes at work in both populations." (my emphasis)

Yet more observational evidence that galaxies are formed on networks of Birkeland currents. Of course to the 'settled science' community it's all very puzzling, no mention of electrical currents or plasma scalability... it must be that pesky dark matter...

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Cargo » Mon Sep 12, 2022 3:30 am

Perhaps they should take a look at the latest TB video with open eyes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qnqp4FqqOuQ

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by BeAChooser » Fri Sep 09, 2022 5:39 pm

Robertus Maximus wrote: Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:43 am "Now astronomers are bemused to find young stars that are spiraling into the center of a massive cluster of stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way."

"But why a spiral?"

Birkeland Currents, perhaps?
Yes. Astronomers should ask that question, but instead they are merely “bemused” and once again mistaken liken what they see to what water does. They talk of “a river-like motion of gas and stars”. They state a spiral is an “efficient” “natural way to feed star formation from the outside toward the center of the cluster.” But they don’t explain the physics of how that occurs.

They don’t explain anything because they can’t look beyond the end of their collective noses. They never once consider the fact it’s not gas they see but plasma. They never once consider the fact that electrical phenomena plays a huge role in the behavior of plasmas. They never once consider the fact that their observations have proven behind a shadow of a doubt that electric current is ubiquitous out there in the depths of space.

It’d be funny if they weren’t holding back the progress of real science with their pig headedness.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Robertus Maximus » Fri Sep 09, 2022 9:43 am

NASA's Hubble Finds Spiraling Stars, Providing Window into Early Universe

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/20 ... y-universe

"Nature likes spirals – from the whirlpool of a hurricane, to pinwheel-shaped protoplanetary disks around newborn stars, to the vast realms of spiral galaxies across our universe.

"Now astronomers are bemused to find young stars that are spiraling into the center of a massive cluster of stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of the Milky Way."

"But why a spiral?"

Birkeland Currents, perhaps?

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by jacmac » Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:05 am

And this:
They say our solar system is in a giant magnetic tunnel.
It could be a different paper on the same discovery.
Or another similar one.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by jackokie » Fri Jan 07, 2022 10:16 pm

@BeAChooser:
Mainstream (i.e., gnome indoctrinated) astrophysicists are simply blind to what's staring them in the face.
After watching Michael Clarage's recent video about gamma rays, it suddenly struct me that the criticism I see repeatedly that EU is a "crackpot theory" because "what do electrical engineers know about space?" has it exactly backwards: Electrical engineers are more likely to recognize the electrical nature of the cosmos because electricity is their "day job" - they work with it all the time, whereas the consensus astrophysicists have probably not given Maxwell's equations a second thought since leaving college.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by BeAChooser » Fri Jan 07, 2022 3:35 am

Robertus Maximus wrote: Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:21 pm "On closer inspection, the team noticed that the gas converges at various points along the filament, which led them to conclude that the hydrogen gas accumulates into large clouds at those locations. They further speculate that atomic gas will gradually condense into a molecular form in those environments."

""However, many questions remain unanswered," Syed added."

Many questions will remain unanswered if your model is wrong. The team concluded that hydrogen gas accumulated at various into large clouds- how? In an electric model of galaxies such 'convergences' would be viewed as pinches in galactic scale Birkeland currents.
Mainstream (i.e., gnome indoctrinated) astrophysicists are simply blind to what's staring them in the face.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Robertus Maximus » Thu Jan 06, 2022 4:21 pm

'Maggie'

"Astronomers Discover One of The Biggest Structures Ever Seen in The Milky Way"
https://www.sciencealert.com/astronomer ... milky-way
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.01057.pdf

"An international team led by astronomers from the Max Planck Institute of Astronomy (MPIA) recently noticed a massive filament of atomic hydrogen gas in our galaxy. This structure, named 'Maggie', is located about 55,000 light-years away (on the other side of the Milky Way) and is one of the longest structures ever observed in our galaxy."

"Whereas the largest known clouds of molecular gas typically measure around 800 light-years in length, Maggie measures 3,900 light-years long and 130 light-years wide."

"On closer inspection, the team noticed that the gas converges at various points along the filament, which led them to conclude that the hydrogen gas accumulates into large clouds at those locations. They further speculate that atomic gas will gradually condense into a molecular form in those environments."

""However, many questions remain unanswered," Syed added."

Many questions will remain unanswered if your model is wrong. The team concluded that hydrogen gas accumulated at various into large clouds- how? In an electric model of galaxies such 'convergences' would be viewed as pinches in galactic scale Birkeland currents.

Re: Galaxies ARE Electric (v3.0)

by Robertus Maximus » Fri May 28, 2021 2:57 pm

Magnetized Threads Weaving Spectacular Galactic Tapestry

https://scitechdaily.com/unprecedented- ... -tapestry/

“Threads of superheated gas and magnetic fields are weaving a tapestry of energy at the center of the Milky Way galaxy.”

“One thread is particularly intriguing because it has X-ray and radio emission intertwined. It points perpendicular to the plane of the galaxy and is about 20 light years long but only one-hundredth that size in width.”

A new study of the X-ray and radio properties of this thread by Q. Daniel Wang of the University of Massachusetts at Amherst suggests these features are bound together by thin strips of magnetic fields. This is similar to what was observed in a previously studied thread. (Both threads are labeled with red rectangles in the image. The newly studied one in the lower left, G0.17-0.41, is much farther away from the plane of the Galaxy.) Such strips may have formed when magnetic fields aligned in different directions, collided, and became twisted around each other in a process called magnetic reconnection. This is similar to the phenomenon that drives energetic particles away from the Sun and is responsible for the space weather that sometimes affects Earth.”

“A detailed study of these threads teaches us more about the Galactic space weather astronomers have witnessed throughout the region.”

“...the new panorama reveals other wonders in the Galactic Center.”

“...large plumes of hot gas, which extend for about 700 light years above and below the plane of the galaxy, seen here in greater detail than ever before. (They are much smaller than the Fermi Bubbles which extend for about 25,000 light years above and below the plane of the galaxy.) These plumes may represent galactic-scale outflows, analogous to the particles driven away from the Sun.”

“...the magnetic threads tend to occur at the outer boundaries of the large plumes of hot gas. This suggests that the gas in the plumes is driving magnetic fields...”

“Threads”, “hot-gas”, “space-weather” yet again modern astrophysicists are at a loss to explain their observations. Yet again magnetic fields simply exist or are generated by supernovae explosions with no mention of the electric currents that generate magnetic fields. Complex plasma behaviour is dismissed as “space weather” or a woven “tapestry of energy”- very poetic but poetry is not science.

Top