by aetherwizard » Thu Oct 06, 2022 4:11 pm
jackokie wrote: ↑Wed Oct 05, 2022 3:21 pmI don't have the math chops to evaluate your work, but I hope those who do will dive in.
As do I. The math is not that difficult since it is basic algebra. But like all things, one first has to learn the basic rules.
It appears that many people have a difficult time contemplating the meaning of "distributed charge." The mainstream has talked about charge being a point particle for so long, that nearly everybody believes that the geometry of charge is a point, which is absurd. A point is a position without dimensions; no physical thing can exist as a point.
Even the fact that charge is notated as a single dimension in the MKS and SI systems of units should be interpreted as charge being a linear dimension (i.e. a line). However, charge always exists over the surface of something (i.e. an area). Rub a balloon against your hair and stick it to the wall. The charge imparted to the balloon is distributed over the full surface of the balloon, and not as points or lines.
The fact that distributed charge appears naturally in cgs units is obvious from the perceived need to introduce "stat" units in order to convert MKS to cgs units. However, instead of converting the incorrect single dimension charge of MKS units to cgs stat units, MKS units should simply be notated with charge squared, in order to be compatible with cgs units. When the systems of units are fixed so that all charge is always notated as a distributed unit (coul^2 instead of coul), then a correct relationship of units results, which allows for equations of gravity to be equated with equations of electromagnetism. This also results in the ability to quantify space as a quantum rotating magnetic field (Aether unit), which also happens to be a very important physical constant that is missed by mainstream physics.
These gravitational equalities with electromagnetism are properly expressed as "tensors." A tensor equation simply demonstrates a tug of war between two different properties. Albert Einstein's tensor equation was intended to quantify the tug of war between matter and space.
Albert Einstein pursued his equations through calculus, which truly is very complicated as there are numerous forms of calculus. The math I use is simple algebra, which is based on simple dimensional analysis. There is no need to invoke complex calculus in physics when you are working with the correct system of units to begin with.
[quote=jackokie post_id=8033 time=1664983314 user_id=1000000111]I don't have the math chops to evaluate your work, but I hope those who do will dive in.[/quote]
As do I. The math is not that difficult since it is basic algebra. But like all things, one first has to learn the basic rules.
It appears that many people have a difficult time contemplating the meaning of "distributed charge." The mainstream has talked about charge being a point particle for so long, that nearly everybody believes that the geometry of charge is a point, which is absurd. A point is a position without dimensions; no physical thing can exist as a point.
Even the fact that charge is notated as a single dimension in the MKS and SI systems of units should be interpreted as charge being a linear dimension (i.e. a line). However, charge always exists over the surface of something (i.e. an area). Rub a balloon against your hair and stick it to the wall. The charge imparted to the balloon is distributed over the full surface of the balloon, and not as points or lines.
The fact that distributed charge appears naturally in cgs units is obvious from the perceived need to introduce "stat" units in order to convert MKS to cgs units. However, instead of converting the incorrect single dimension charge of MKS units to cgs stat units, MKS units should simply be notated with charge squared, in order to be compatible with cgs units. When the systems of units are fixed so that all charge is always notated as a distributed unit (coul^2 instead of coul), then a correct relationship of units results, which allows for equations of gravity to be equated with equations of electromagnetism. This also results in the ability to quantify space as a quantum rotating magnetic field (Aether unit), which also happens to be a very important physical constant that is missed by mainstream physics.
These gravitational equalities with electromagnetism are properly expressed as "tensors." A tensor equation simply demonstrates a tug of war between two different properties. Albert Einstein's tensor equation was intended to quantify the tug of war between matter and space.
Albert Einstein pursued his equations through calculus, which truly is very complicated as there are numerous forms of calculus. The math I use is simple algebra, which is based on simple dimensional analysis. There is no need to invoke complex calculus in physics when you are working with the correct system of units to begin with.