by crawler » Sat Feb 10, 2024 8:52 pm
Jaaanosik wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:17 pm
crawler wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 2:00 am
https://www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie ... glisch.pdf
Translation into English
Chapter 2
Catalogue of Errors for Both Theories of Relativity from the documentation of G.O. Mueller
On the Absolute Magnitude of the Special Theory of Relativity
A Documentary Thought Experiment on 95 Years of Criticism (1908-2003) with Proof of 3789 Critical Works
Text Version 2.1 - June 2004
Translator: Rothwell Bronrowan
Electromagnetism
F: Electromagnetism / Error No. 1
I do not see the experiment that supports the error claim.
Which one?
Every (Faraday Paradox) experiment on youtube that shows a voltage for a Faraday Disc when the magnet is co-rotating with the disc confirms that the voltage is not due to relative motion, which sinks STR.
F: Electromagnetism / Error No. 3
The STR was developed without any knowledge of unipolar induction, which is an induction without relative motion between field and conductor
It is true that Albert Einstein mentions in AE 1905 (p. 910) "unipolar machines", but he does not treat the fundamental findings of unipolar induction. - Unipolar induction has been known since Faraday. This effect has been closely examined since the end of the 19th century, and since 1905 it has become increasingly important as conclusive experimental proof against the validity of the principle of relativity of the STR. As a result, unipolar induction has never been a subject of discussion in the presentations of the relativists.
The experiment on unipolar induction has two different designs: (A) a round bar magnet that can rotate on its longitudinal axis, and a wire loop attached to the bar magnet at two different points (both ends) with sliding contacts; (B) the wire loop is affixed to the bar magnet.
If, in the setup (A), the magnet is rotated once (relative to the laboratory table) and another time the wire loop, i.e. two relative motion whose relativity is completely identical, the location of the electromotive force is different. With this the complete symmetry of the processes is broken.
If the rotation takes place in setup (B), in which the whole (magnet and wire loop) exists as a single moving part, a current is induced. In other words, an induction without relative motion between magnet and conductor, or if one wishes to assume a relative motion, then
with respect to the ether or to space. The induction without relative motion is thus evidence of absolute motion or of relative motion with respect to the ether (medium, space), depending on one's interpretation. The relativists may choose which of the two should disprove their theory..........[quote=Jaaanosik post_id=9822 time=1707581878 user_id=1000000339]
[quote=crawler post_id=9819 time=1707530443 user_id=30412]
https://www.kritik-relativitaetstheorie.de/Anhaenge/Kapitel2-englisch.pdf
Translation into English
Chapter 2
Catalogue of Errors for Both Theories of Relativity from the documentation of G.O. Mueller
On the Absolute Magnitude of the Special Theory of Relativity
A Documentary Thought Experiment on 95 Years of Criticism (1908-2003) with Proof of 3789 Critical Works
Text Version 2.1 - June 2004
Translator: Rothwell Bronrowan
Electromagnetism
F: Electromagnetism / Error No. 1
[/quote]
I do not see the experiment that supports the error claim.
Which one?
[/quote]Every (Faraday Paradox) experiment on youtube that shows a voltage for a Faraday Disc when the magnet is co-rotating with the disc confirms that the voltage is not due to relative motion, which sinks STR.
[i][u]F: Electromagnetism / Error No. 3[/u]
The STR was developed without any knowledge of unipolar induction, which is an induction without relative motion between field and conductor
It is true that Albert Einstein mentions in AE 1905 (p. 910) "unipolar machines", but he does not treat the fundamental findings of unipolar induction. - Unipolar induction has been known since Faraday. This effect has been closely examined since the end of the 19th century, and since 1905 it has become increasingly important as conclusive experimental proof against the validity of the principle of relativity of the STR. As a result, unipolar induction has never been a subject of discussion in the presentations of the relativists.
The experiment on unipolar induction has two different designs: (A) a round bar magnet that can rotate on its longitudinal axis, and a wire loop attached to the bar magnet at two different points (both ends) with sliding contacts; (B) the wire loop is affixed to the bar magnet.
If, in the setup (A), the magnet is rotated once (relative to the laboratory table) and another time the wire loop, i.e. two relative motion whose relativity is completely identical, the location of the electromotive force is different. With this the complete symmetry of the processes is broken.
If the rotation takes place in setup (B), in which the whole (magnet and wire loop) exists as a single moving part, a current is induced. In other words, an induction without relative motion between magnet and conductor, or if one wishes to assume a relative motion, then
with respect to the ether or to space. The induction without relative motion is thus evidence of absolute motion or of relative motion with respect to the ether (medium, space), depending on one's interpretation. The relativists may choose which of the two should disprove their theory..........[/i]