"Net Charge"

[earls]

"simple"

I absolutely agree with you, my only question is: if it's so simple, why haven't we done so? Even with infinite ignorance about EU, would not measuring charge be interesting all the same? Curious.

[jjohnson]

StevenO,
You've been up late reading Miles Mathis, Haven't you?
Me, too.
He's very interesting.

[StevenO]

StevenO,
You've been up late reading Miles Mathis, Haven't you?
Me, too.
He's very interesting.

Indeed. Especially for EU he has some interesting "discoveries". I think Wall Thornhill should take notice of him instead of Ralph Sansbury. Miles is also in line with one of my other favorite theories: the Reciprocal System of Dewey Larson. Larson is always talking about motion in three dimensions as an abstract concept, while Miles shows that everything is simply build from photons and that the spin dimensions difference between photons and protons/neutrons is three (four if you would count linear motion too).

I also have some experiments in mind to show that pi=4 in circular trajectories. One of my acceleration sensors channels seems broken though. Have to wait for a new one to come in a few days.