Ancient knowledge of Precession

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
Grey Cloud
Posts: 2477
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
Location: NW UK

Re: Ancient knowledge of Precession

Post by Grey Cloud » Sat Aug 08, 2009 6:12 pm

Plasmatic wrote:
What is it with you people?
I said if believed in the Jewish god he was de facto a creationist. Therefore, by extention, if he did not believe in the Jewish god he was not a Creationist.
Whatever V was, and I don't give a toss either way, there is nothing wrong with my statement, only your prejudiced interpretations of it.
Before you said "if" you said:
given that V was Jewish and therefore a Creationist
Indeed. Nick pulled me for it though his only counter-argument was that there was no Creationist philosophy in V writings.
I then clarified my statement to incluse the 'if' part. StevenJay then jumped in and challenged my clarified statement .
Nick then came in again saying that V didn't interpret the book of Genesis as the work of a deity. He didn't say what V interpetation was, nor does Nick's statement prove that V didn't believe in the Jewish god.
StevenJay came in again and said nothing about V.
And now you have come in and taken us back to the beginning again.
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests