Throughout my adult life, I have always had a great love of astronomy, but I must say that the last 11 years or so have been an eye opening experience for me. I think of 'science' as being an open ended, and open minded process. I still believe that is true for most people. I had always assumed that empirical explanations would be preferred over supernatural constructs, and I assumed that actual "knowledge" was important to everyone, including astronomers. I'm not convinced that's actually the case anymore.
While the study of solar satellite images was the cause of, and the start of my conversion to the electric universe paradigm, it wasn't until I saw the work of Birkeland, Alfven, Bruce and Peratt that I realized just how impoverished my life had been with respect to astronomy. All these years I'd simply been oblivious to empirical lab tested explanations for many of the observations I was seeing not only in the solar atmosphere, but everywhere that I looked in the universe. Slowly and steadily my ignorance began to give way to knowledge simply by embracing circuit theory as it applies to events in space plasma.
It's been an amazing journey of discovery actually, one I've enjoyed and appreciated, and yet it's had it's share of disappoint too.
I think it's natural to want to share real 'empirical knowledge' with other people, particularly those who claim to be seeking the answers. Birkeland's lab work with terrellas is as relevant today as it was 100 years ago. All the "mysteries' of solar atmospheric physics are explained by, and demonstrated by his lab work.
Alfven took the application of circuit theory to a cosmic perspective, and showed how it applies to almost every plasma feature that we find in spacetime. Peratt even took his models and build computer simulations that show *many* observations that are easily explained by circuit theory.
Donald Scott taught us how currents flow bidirectionally inside plasma threads too. There's an amazing amount of mathematical support for EU/PC concepts and ideas out there for anyone that's interested in reviewing it.
Considering the fact that 95 percent of the mainstream astronomy model amounts to nothing more than placeholder terms for human ignorance, I would think that the mainstream would be *happy* to embrace some empirical explanations for events in space. Instead however, they seem quite intent on wallowing around in their dark ignorance, and conjuring up even more invisible entities to do their bidding.
It's almost surreal to me how many *failures* that LCDM theory has experienced over the past decade. Not only did we discover that the mainstream completely botched their baryonic mass estimates in 2006, we also falsified every "popular" exotic matter model on the table at LHC and other experiments over the past decade.
In 2016, dark energy claims enjoy only a three sigma confidence level after expanding the SN!A data set by many times its original number, and only if we *assume* that zero amount of photon redshift is related to inelastic scattering in plasma.
Planck's discovery of a hemispheric variation in the microwave background defies Guth's original claim about "homogeneity" on the largest scales.
What's really left standing of the claims of "discovery" in LCDM? Nothing. What is there to lose by abandoning that supernatural monstrosity? Absolutely nothing. Even the mathematics the mainstream applies to solar physics and light plasmas in general is a form of 'psuedoscience' according to the Nobel Prize winning author of MHD theory. Even the math they use to describe the five percent of the plasma universe they claim to "understand" is based upon pseudoscience, not empirical physics. LCDM is literally a *zero empirical knowledge* theory, and therefore there is absolutely nothing to be lost by simply "letting it go".
What is their to gain by embracing circuit theory as it applies to plasma in space? Only, a real empirical knowledge of spacetime. Birkeland's models didn't just work correctly on "paper", most importantly they worked in the lab. He didn't just 'predict" things on paper, he *simulated* those same physical predictions in his lab.
It's not even possible to fully explain the total energy release of local short circuits in plasma based on magnetism alone without looking at the *full circuit energy* that's involved in the process, yet that's exactly what the mainstream is trying to do.
There's everything to gain by embracing circuit theory in space, and in terms of actual "knowledge", there's nothing to lose by abandoning an invisible sky mythology. When will the mainstream embrace actual empirical knowledge and leave the "dark" ages behind? I feel almost sad for them, but I'm more sad for the unsuspecting general public that is being led down the supernatural primrose path with respect to astronomy.
A beautiful journey of empirical discovery awaits.....
-
Michael Mozina
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
- Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
- Contact:
-
BeAChooser
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2015 7:24 pm
Re: A beautiful journey of empirical discovery awaits.....
Michael, I just want to thank you for your many insightful, fact-filled, and thought-provoking threads and posts over the years. They've been a true gift. I, like you, hope that a time is coming soon when science will mean what it once did.
-
Michael Mozina
- Posts: 1701
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 10:35 am
- Location: Mt. Shasta, CA
- Contact:
Re: A beautiful journey of empirical discovery awaits.....
Thank you very much. I too have great hope for the future. I look forward to the day when we finally shed our dark shackles of self imposed superstitious ignorance as it relates to astronomy.BeAChooser wrote:Michael, I just want to thank you for your many insightful, fact-filled, and thought-provoking threads and posts over the years. They've been a true gift. I, like you, hope that a time is coming soon when science will mean what it once did.
Other areas of 'science' are already experiencing a huge Renaissance. In physics and in medicine, the application of circuit theory has transformed our technological world, providing us with cell phones that are more powerful that computers that once took up an entire room, and providing us with the tools to map out our entire DNA structure. It's only a matter of time before circuit theory transforms our understanding of astronomy too. I look forward to that day.
IMO, the future of space travel will likely be the most transformed by us finally comprehending that we live inside of an electric universe. We don't really need to bring all our power with us, we just need to tap into an existing system. The future is so bright, we have to wear shades.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests