If I am correct, helium type elements would be replacing the electron of moving closer to infra-red, with the proton of taking electron neutrinos.
If this is brought into contacting with it's opposing element, it can spontaneously be created. Non-isotopic helium's opposing element is aluminum type elements - which is replacing the neutron of colors around opposites with the proton of rising above colors around opposites.
1: neutron of colors around opposites (positrons) appear to be electrons. Electrons are slower colors around opposites, neutrons are quicker colors around opposites, and positions are just colors around opposites in general.
So these elements that appear as electrons, combine with the electron that begins the helium molecule - then combined with the same type of proton of helium and aluminum type elements, makes two protons.
It is probably true that even just finding a way to make protons and electrons change their states, the correct one's could be found which mimic what is required for helium to come about - when helium type energies come into contact with the aluminum type energies. 1 electron - 1 electron type energy - and 2 protons. Why is helium created and not some element related to helium like argon? Because it is second in it's class of related elements, making it's class of all elements similar to it, gravitate toward the 2 electrons and 2 protons of helium. This is based off of Walter Russell's work.
Helium nucleus
-
Bengt Nyman
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:39 pm
- Location: USA and Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Helium nucleus
Carbon nucleus formed by Coulomb forces between 6 protons and 6 neutrons:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-EmTqOl4X4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-EmTqOl4X4
-
JouniJokela
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:34 pm
- Location: Swiss
Re: Helium nucleus
You seem to have really solid way to simulate these.
How does this model of yours predict the existence of following isotopes?
Hydrogen-4 (-5, -6, -7, -8)
Helium-2
Helium-5 (-7, -9, -10)
Lithium-5 (-4, -10)
Beryllium-8 (-6, -13)
Boron-9 (-7)
Carbon-8
I expect you cant form these.
Especially interesting would be, if you can show that Helium-2 can't exist.
As this would open the way to rethink this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Core
Or actually this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2 ... n_reaction
Simply; Could you "Kill" diproton? -Make it a Fantacy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_ ... iproton.29
If yes, you should have a Nobel-prize!
Edit; What's thess videos? Just noticed them;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQwDn19UH1I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_iIlwXKTaA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TujiMhmuZP8
..pls explain;
How does this model of yours predict the existence of following isotopes?
Hydrogen-4 (-5, -6, -7, -8)
Helium-2
Helium-5 (-7, -9, -10)
Lithium-5 (-4, -10)
Beryllium-8 (-6, -13)
Boron-9 (-7)
Carbon-8
I expect you cant form these.
Especially interesting would be, if you can show that Helium-2 can't exist.
As this would open the way to rethink this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun#Core
Or actually this;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2 ... n_reaction
Simply; Could you "Kill" diproton? -Make it a Fantacy?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_ ... iproton.29
If yes, you should have a Nobel-prize!
Edit; What's thess videos? Just noticed them;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQwDn19UH1I
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_iIlwXKTaA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TujiMhmuZP8
..pls explain;
-
Bengt Nyman
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2010 11:39 pm
- Location: USA and Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Helium nucleus
I can answer your "edit question". The simulations show:
1. Two protons inside their strongforce range, each in form of a classical triangular quark formation. Notice that with the correct positioning the two engage in a strongforce bond, without any "gluons", and despite their overall positive charge.
2. Two protons outside their strongforce range repelling each other as expected by their similar charge.
3. An older simulation of case 1 above. A bit hard to see because of the projection.
P.S. The larger nuclei are very difficult to simulate because for strongforce bonds to be attainable they require proper pre-positioning within each bonding hadron pair as well as in relation to the position and orientation of other hadrons.
When a simulation fails to bond into a stable nucleus chances are 99% that I have made a mistake in pre-positioning the constituents, and maybe 1% that it is an unstable or even non-existing isotope.
1. Two protons inside their strongforce range, each in form of a classical triangular quark formation. Notice that with the correct positioning the two engage in a strongforce bond, without any "gluons", and despite their overall positive charge.
2. Two protons outside their strongforce range repelling each other as expected by their similar charge.
3. An older simulation of case 1 above. A bit hard to see because of the projection.
P.S. The larger nuclei are very difficult to simulate because for strongforce bonds to be attainable they require proper pre-positioning within each bonding hadron pair as well as in relation to the position and orientation of other hadrons.
When a simulation fails to bond into a stable nucleus chances are 99% that I have made a mistake in pre-positioning the constituents, and maybe 1% that it is an unstable or even non-existing isotope.
-
kodybatill
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2015 4:28 pm
Re: Helium nucleus
I believe to have discovered how to create these isotopes. It has to do with the Vector Equilibrium Nassim Haramein has been working on. If one were to make a vector equilibrium with 3rd generation isotopic silicon - which is replacing the neutron of taking two or more things moving slow enough to break apart, with the proton of moving them into something similar, making part of that thing move slow enough to break apart - and this has occurred 3 times to make 3rd generation silicon isotope -
-Then combine this with what I have been calling the Universal Measurement - and different multiples of the inert gases at the center of the Universal measurement, and directed at the vector equilibrium - causes the creation of those isotopes represented by the multiples. Essentially the Universal Measurement is fully positioned and "used-up", or occupied pi golden mean ratio, by the maximum number of elements at once. This ends up looking something like inert gases in the center and above, with calcium type water below, and latitudinal + longitudinal lines creating and breaking bubbles with hydrogen type elements at 90 degrees to the inert gases at the center of the universal measurement. This is bare bones description, but is an example of what can create all isotopes.
The third generation silicon in the shape of the vector equilibrium and then the universal measurement aimed at it - causes the pi golden mean ratio in all space to slow down - causing it to move itself in order to not slow down too-much. This movement is then directed by the multiples of inert gases at the center of the universal measurement.
I have no proof of this at the time, but someone will get it possibly, someone who has more lab knowledge than me.
-Then combine this with what I have been calling the Universal Measurement - and different multiples of the inert gases at the center of the Universal measurement, and directed at the vector equilibrium - causes the creation of those isotopes represented by the multiples. Essentially the Universal Measurement is fully positioned and "used-up", or occupied pi golden mean ratio, by the maximum number of elements at once. This ends up looking something like inert gases in the center and above, with calcium type water below, and latitudinal + longitudinal lines creating and breaking bubbles with hydrogen type elements at 90 degrees to the inert gases at the center of the universal measurement. This is bare bones description, but is an example of what can create all isotopes.
The third generation silicon in the shape of the vector equilibrium and then the universal measurement aimed at it - causes the pi golden mean ratio in all space to slow down - causing it to move itself in order to not slow down too-much. This movement is then directed by the multiples of inert gases at the center of the universal measurement.
I have no proof of this at the time, but someone will get it possibly, someone who has more lab knowledge than me.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests