Natural Law proves Dark Matter does not exist.

[willendure]

http://www.physicscentral.com/buzz/blog ... 9875990673

What this is saying is, that as the rotation of a galaxy can be determined purely from its visible matter, and there is no reason to believe that the amount of dark matter is always exactly in proportion to the amount of visibile matter, that dark matter cannot be the explanation for the galaxy rotation problem. As dark matter was invented to solve this problem, this refutes that it is the solution to the problem, and we can confidently say that it does not in fact exist at all.

[Michael Mozina]

http://thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/v ... =3&t=15850

If we look at that information in context with all the revelations of stellar miscounts, and the fact that they only found the majority of the mass of a galaxy in 2012, along with the lab results for the past decade, it all points us to the inevitable conclusion that the mainstream's baryonic mass estimates aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

The "problem" for the mainstream is that they simply *cannot* insert "ordinary" (baryonic) matter into "big bang" theory and still get the right patterns on the wall of their snowglobe universe, or get the right nucleosynthesis numbers. They are therefore required to bury their collective heads in the sand to any and all information which contradicts their exotic matter of the gaps claims.

[Michael Mozina]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... sions.html

These new observations support earlier assumptions that the source of these emissions may be ‘heavily obscured’ active galaxies.

This is pretty much the icing on the cake IMO. Their "mostly dark" galaxies are nothing more than partially "obscured" galaxies to start with, which explains why the rotation pattern of the galaxy tracks to the ordinary matter in the galaxy. Whatever light isn't obscured from us, it allows us to see the basic mass layout of every galaxy anyway, even if we can't see light from every star in that galaxy.

There never was any need at all for exotic forms of matter to explain either galaxy rotation curves, or lensing data. All of it can be explained with ordinary baryonic matter and some obscuring effects of ordinary dust between Earth and those objects.

LCDM proponents however are emotionally, professionally and financially invested in the existence of exotic forms of matter.

[Sceptical lefty]

It is not logically possible to prove a negative proposition of this nature. For this reason, it cannot be proved that dark matter (or the Tooth Fairy, or the basis of any religion) does not exist. However, the onus of proof is on the advocates of dark matter to establish that the effects ascribed to it cannot reasonably be attributed to another source.

Electricity in space cannot be considered, or even mentioned, by the guardians of the Standard Model. For this reason, don't expect dark matter to be decisively rejected any time soon. It may quietly be forgotten over a few years. I would not be surprised to see that the observed effects can be successfully modelled by collimated streams of dark energy, confined by frozen-in magnetic lines of force. (God! I hope I haven't given someone any ideas.)

[kell1990]

It is not logically possible to prove a negative proposition of this nature. For this reason, it cannot be proved that dark matter (or the Tooth Fairy, or the basis of any religion) does not exist. However, the onus of proof is on the advocates of dark matter to establish that the effects ascribed to it cannot reasonably be attributed to another source.

Electricity in space cannot be considered, or even mentioned, by the guardians of the Standard Model. For this reason, don't expect dark matter to be decisively rejected any time soon. It may quietly be forgotten over a few years. I would not be surprised to see that the observed effects can be successfully modelled by collimated streams of dark energy, confined by frozen-in magnetic lines of force. (God! I hope I haven't given someone any ideas.)

Well, pretty much everyone here would agree with you on that. We're glad that you've joined us,

What we need is proof of the concept. It would seem to the ordinary person--those ordinary persons that even understand what you are talking about--can see that what you say is true, yet wonder why the "establishment" is so far out of line with reality.

But scientific proof is needed to displace an existing theory.

It seems to me that such proof is very abundant, if not concentrated in one single strand. It is everywhere. In the Cosmos, in the galaxy, and most of all on Earth.

[Michael Mozina]

It is not logically possible to prove a negative proposition of this nature. For this reason, it cannot be proved that dark matter (or the Tooth Fairy, or the basis of any religion) does not exist. However, the onus of proof is on the advocates of dark matter to establish that the effects ascribed to it cannot reasonably be attributed to another source.

The problem is that it's been shown time and time and time again that ordinary baryonic material works perfectly to explain their "missing mass" in their flawed mass estimates as it relates to lensing data and galaxy rotation patterns. The only reason that the mainstream continues to promote an exotic form of matter is due to the fact that the patterns on the CMB and the nucleosynthesis numbers *require* exotic matter. In short, their entire theory blows up in their face the moment they admit that they they simply blew the baryonic mass estimates, and ordinary plasma is the likely culprit.

It's the ultimate catch 22, and pure denial is the only thing that can save them.

Electricity in space cannot be considered, or even mentioned, by the guardians of the Standard Model.

Yep. Electricity is the empirical satan figure in their melodrama which defeats their supernatural creation mythos. They dare not mention it's name.

[Webbman]

Yep. Electricity is the empirical GOD figure in their melodrama which defeats their supernatural creation mythos. They dare not mention it's name.

Fixed! You have to be honest about who your dealing with here. They love Satan, the father of lies. Without lies they got nothing. God on the other hand is the truth, and the truth is electromagnetic and in my opinion, aetheric.

[Michael Mozina]

Whatever the psychological association, it's effect on their beliefs is staggering.

Not only have LCDM proponents *assumed* the existence of an exotic type of "dark matter" based upon an *assumption* of correct baryonic mass estimation techniques, they have utterly and willfully ignored all empirical evidence to the contrary of both the validity of their baryonic mass calculations, and the validity of their assumption of the existence of exotic matter.

As others have already been pointed out, there's no way to prove a negative. More importantly, there is now ample evidence that ordinary baryonic matter is responsible for both the lensing data and the galaxy rotation patterns. A simple Occam's razor argument would typically do the trick to eliminate the need for exotic matter, but their own biases prevent them from seeing the obvious flaws in their claims.

Even after billions of dollars spent on supposed "tests" of their claims in the lab, they refuse to abide by the results of those "tests" of their claims. Exotic matter theory has had zero useful predictive value in the lab, and it's has zero "predictive" value in space as well.

[lamare]

It is not logically possible to prove a negative proposition of this nature. For this reason, it cannot be proved that dark matter (or the Tooth Fairy, or the basis of any religion) does not exist. However, the onus of proof is on the advocates of dark matter to establish that the effects ascribed to it cannot reasonably be attributed to another source.

However, I can be mathematically proven that Maxwell's equations are inconsistent, because the units of measurements in his electric field potential definition do not match with the aether hypothesis he supposedly started out from:

http://www.tuks.nl/wiki/index.php/Main/ ... Everything

With one additional definition for gravity G=grad E, we come to a complete "theory of everything", whereby we can reject both relativity as well as quantum madness, since both are caused by this single error, "Maxwell"s hole".

With this approach, we can explain several anomalies as well, so it's only a matter of time before sanity will return to the scientific realm.

Regards,

Arend.