Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
flyingcloud
Posts: 490
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:07 am
Location: Honey Brook

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by flyingcloud » Sun Mar 19, 2017 12:56 pm

the twist causes the z-pinch

it's in the coil

rotation

unfortunately I have no evidence
sorry to interupt

kell1990
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by kell1990 » Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:33 pm

Z-axis wrote:This may sound silly to you but why not query Don Scott himself? Would he not be able to explain in greater detail and understanding then the rest of us. I have emailed him several times over the years and he has graciously responded to every query. To me, that is very impressive because it seems like he would be very busy; yet he replied. Give it a shot. You may be pleasantly surprised.

Regards Everyone

Z-axis
This sounds like a very logical approach to me.

I have my own ideas about "Z-pinches" and "Bennett Pinches" but before I proceed further, I'd like to hear Dr. Scott's view on this. Who knows? We may be on the same page here;.

Trickster
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2016 8:19 am

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by Trickster » Tue Mar 21, 2017 2:33 am

Z-axis wrote:This may sound silly to you but why not query Don Scott himself? Would he not be able to explain in greater detail and understanding then the rest of us. I have emailed him several times over the years and he has graciously responded to every query. To me, that is very impressive because it seems like he would be very busy; yet he replied. Give it a shot. You may be pleasantly surprised.

Regards Everyone

Z-axis
Thanks Z-axis. I appreciate your interest. I did contact Wal and requested Don as well thru thunderbolts. The email thing. Problem is they get tons of emails and stuff from lots of places. I do not know if they got it and or if it was of interest to them. I have changed my view on some of the stuff I sent them. I do not hold that the planetary solar system attracts anything. Mathis makes it clear that only repelling can be mechanical (non charge) so the Earth and Moon are repelling each other. Repelling is the inverse of attraction so the math mirrors the same end results. Jupiter fails to attract Mars and the whole inner planets as a unit ignore Jupiter. If attraction was the action, all the inner planets would be satellites of Jupiter as its strength is 3 earth masses at half the distance the earth is to the sun.

Jupiter is repelling and its distance from the sun is due to its charge, which can be deduced by the square of its ratio to the sun unit at 3 earth masses at the distance of 75 million km. Jupiter at 778.6 million km divided by 75 million km equals 10.3813. When squared (107.72) is the ratio and multiplied by 3 gives the number of earth masses for Jupiter (323.3). You can then know all the formative masses of all of the planets by the 1/18 principle.

I have also sent them previously my chronology solutions that uses cycle T=181/6 year orbits and cycle V=1001/34 as given in my web site. They do not understand chronology so my efforts at communication are seemingly in vain. If I had and hour with them, I am sure I could convince them of the solutions presented. Lots of great individuals are unaware of what is out there and they need reviewers to help them pick out the good stuff from all the rest. See http://chronologyone.blogspot.com if you think you can review if for them.

Presently I have written 4 articles. I would have sent them to Science, but I lack an institutional sponsor. The most important one right now is the one on Science using known false principles. At 4 pages it is short. However, it presents the reasons why false principles are used and organizational resistance in changing paradigms. If you want to help and be a reviewer that someone at Thunderbolts would listen to, I would be grateful. My previous contact was Amy who has left this world. Email me at conwayjames3@hotmail.com and I will send you the draft.

jacmac
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by jacmac » Wed Mar 22, 2017 10:15 pm

QAfReb5wr3zafawu said:
* Must a Z pinch persist for the life of a star ?
I would say NO.

I do not see evidence of an ongoing Z Pinch (something in an hourglass shape perhaps) whereby current arrives from one direction, is pinched down, does work(powers the sun) then continues off in the opposite direction. AT LEAST NOT WITHIN THE SOLAR SYSTEM. I would defer to Celeste about the activity outside the solar system.

Also, I do not see the sun as one electrode IN A CIRCUIT, with the heliosphere as the other electrode. That would put one electrode(sun) totally within the other electrode(heliosphere); begging the question, how does the circuit get the current in to the sun in the first place without it coming from the second electrode, the heliosphere ?

Jack

User avatar
comingfrom
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:11 pm
Location: NSW, Australia
Contact:

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by comingfrom » Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:09 pm

I see stars as being focal points.
They draw in currents from their surroundings which is, in effect, a pinch.

And currents have flow both ways.
Either that, or there are incoming as well as outgoing currents, in all celestial bodies.
I don't think we can think of a solar system as a simple cathode and anode setup.

A picture showing both kinds of Z-Pinch.
Filamentry and Stellar.

Image

The Sun's environment

Image

Images from Wal Thornhill's website

jacmac
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by jacmac » Thu Mar 23, 2017 10:50 pm

Comingfrom:
I see stars as being focal points.
They draw in currents from their surroundings which is, in effect, a pinch
I see it as the "drift current" Dr. Scott describes in THE ELECTRIC SKY, which results in a great concentration (focal point) of the plasma. But a "pinch" implies a continuation of current into and out of the pinch as shown in your first photo.
Jack

willendure
Posts: 605
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2014 8:29 am

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by willendure » Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:14 am

Has the polar double layer ever been detected for our sun? I know we have put satellites over the poles, did they pick up an accelerated jet of electrons or ions coming in at the poles?

User avatar
D_Archer
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 4:01 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by D_Archer » Fri Mar 24, 2017 7:04 am

willendure wrote:Has the polar double layer ever been detected for our sun? I know we have put satellites over the poles, did they pick up an accelerated jet of electrons or ions coming in at the poles?
Not yet (as far as i know), it still too far away, a probe needs to actually fly through with a Langmuir probe.

Regards,
Daniel
- Shoot Forth Thunder -

jacmac
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by jacmac » Fri Mar 24, 2017 8:09 am

AS far as I know, Ulysses has been the only probe that had a high orbit angle to the suns equatorial plane. About 80 degrees. At the times it passed closest to the solar poles it was still quite far away from being directly over the poles(as best I can determine). And there is not much information about the "polar" passes I could find that is free.
Jack

upriver
Posts: 542
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 7:17 pm

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by upriver » Fri Mar 24, 2017 1:10 pm

From actually examining the local environment of the Heliosphere and our position in the galaxy, this is the plasma flow through the heliosphere from the local fluff cloud.

https://app.box.com/s/lf0ttitirc9p5mpedp6vhu0egw1achgt

https://app.box.com/s/vvdmk9deuui81t1vq80tl9043ow46gvs

jacmac
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by jacmac » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:25 pm

I have followed the EU story for almost seven years.
It makes sense to me.
The sun is electric.
There is a lot of evidence for the Z Pinch in space.
The plasma filaments hold their form for tremendous distances.
A major filament pinch, utilizing serious electromagnetic energy, might create a new star.(or other things)

However:
Within our solar system there is no pinch of a continuous Birkeland current. IMO.
Also, there is no continuous direct current that is the "discharge" we call the photosphere. IMO

Just as the Double layer and the Z Pinch are recognized as unique structures in plasma rich space, the PHOTOSPHERE/CHROMOSPHERE/CORONA/HELIOSPHERE is also a unique structure.

It is a self organizing electrical event, using the largest body around as an anchor in space, and condensing the plasma entering the heliosphere from the interstellar medium.
The 40 fold greater density of plasma outside the solar system than within supports this idea. IMO.

Jack

Ps. It is an electric version of SPONTANEOUS COMBUSTION.

User avatar
comingfrom
Posts: 760
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 9:11 pm
Location: NSW, Australia
Contact:

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by comingfrom » Fri Mar 24, 2017 6:08 pm

Here is a paper about the discovery of the pinch effect.

First discovered in a lightning rod,
so there are pinches in our solar system, even here on Earth.

THE DISCOVERY OF THE PINCH EFFECT

jacmac
Posts: 596
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:36 pm

Re: Z Pinch Examined in Detail

Post by jacmac » Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:21 am

Thanks Comingfrom. I have seen that pinched lightning rod photo.
My comment above was regarding a possible ongoing pinch that powers the sun.
Jack

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests