I answer another set of Sparky comments here.airman, thank you. Yes, I am on a steep learning curve and feel lost most of the time.
Re: Miles Mathis and his Charge Field
Postby LongtimeAirman » Sun Jun 29, 2014 2:49 pm
Chr6,
You are shooting way too high! How can you make head or tail of that?
Superconductivity, explained mechanically by the charge field. 3pp.
http://milesmathis.com/conduct.html
I imagine that if the plumbing were built from neutrons, we'd see the minimum resistance to charge flow.
Or if the motion (thermal) is reduced enough, a greater throughput results, especially when aligned with the earth's emission field.
When we talk about superconductivity, we are thinking of electric flow without resistance. Ion and electron flow never stopping or slowing.
This might be a hack but the slot layout may be like this?Gadolinium
Gadolinium is a chemical element with symbol Gd and atomic number 64. It is a silvery-white, malleable and ductile rare-earth metal. It is found in nature only in combined (salt) form.
...
Physical properties
Gadolinium is a silvery-white malleable and ductile rare-earth metal. It crystallizes in hexagonal, close-packed α- form at room temperature, but, when heated to temperatures above 1235 °C, it transforms into its β- form, which has a body-centered cubic structure.[1]
Gadolinium-157 has the highest thermal neutron capture cross-section among any stable nuclides: 259,000 barns. Only xenon-135 has a higher cross section, 2 million barns, but that isotope is unstable.[2]
Gadolinium is ferromagnetic at temperatures below 20 °C (68 °F)[3] and is strongly paramagnetic above this temperature. Gadolinium demonstrates a magnetocaloric effect whereby its temperature increases when it enters a magnetic field and decreases when it leaves the magnetic field. The temperature is lowered to (5 °C (41 °F)) for the gadolinium alloy Gd85Er15, and the effect is considerably stronger for the alloy Gd5(Si2Ge2), but at a much lower temperature (<85 K (−188.2 °C; −306.7 °F)).[4] A significant magnetocaloric effect is observed at higher temperatures, up to 300 K, in the Gd5(SixGe1-x)4 compounds.[5]
Individual gadolinium atoms have been isolated by encapsulating them into fullerene molecules and visualized with transmission electron microscope.[6] Individual Gd atoms and small Gd clusters have also been incorporated into carbon nanotubes.[7]
Gadolinium has the highest neutron cross-section among any stable nuclides: 61,000 barns for 155Gd and 259,000 barns for 157Gd. 157Gd has been used to target tumors in neutron therapy. This element is very effective for use with neutron radiography and in shielding of nuclear reactors. It is used as a secondary, emergency shut-down measure in some nuclear reactors, particularly of the CANDU type.[1] Gadolinium is also used in nuclear marine propulsion systems as a burnable poison.
Gadolinium also possesses unusual metallurgic properties, with as little as 1% of gadolinium improving the workability and resistance of iron, chromium, and related alloys to high temperatures and oxidation.
Gadolinium is paramagnetic at room temperature, with a ferromagnetic Curie point of 20 °C.[3] Paramagnetic ions, such as gadolinium, move differently within a magnetic field.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gadolinium
Thanks for that paper. That's a recent but important one that I forgot about.LongtimeAirman wrote:Chr6,
I made this Gadolinium ? starting from Europium, taken from, "Period Six of the Periodic Table".
http://milesmathis.com/haf.pdf
How would you number that?
REMCB
Until now. We have seen that my theory of charge recycling allows us to explain everything
mechanically, and we will continue to see it here with Lanthanide contraction. The huge jump in radius
between Barium and Lanthanum and between Lutetium and Hafnium tells us something extraordinary
is happening. I have shown that it is explained by the different cores. The Lanthanides have the green
5-stack core, while the other elements of Period 6 are built from the cyan 6-stack core of Xenon. You
can immediately see why this would have a huge effect on charge recycling, but be careful—it may not
be the effect you think. Although Barium has 54 protons in the core and Lanthanum has only 45,
Barium has only two protons pulling in charge. Lanthanum has 12 protons pulling charge through,
including three at the poles and three on the inner axis. This latter fact is more important than the core
difference. The biggest core in the world isn't much use in channeling charge without 4th level protons
pulling charge in—as we see with the Noble Gasses. Xenon has a huge core, for all the good it does.
_L1: He explains that QM is based on the erroneous assumption that a mathematical point is equivalent to a physical point, when in reality a physical point is nothing. Photons and electrons are erroneously treated as points, whereas points don't exist. Photons and electrons must have radius and mass in order to exist in physical reality._S1: Sparky (Jun30?): I have begun to reevaluate quantum mechanics. What does MM say about that area of study?
http://www.wired.com/2014/06/the-new-quantum-reality/
_L2: Photons are quantum objects and have definite radius and mass._S2: To some researchers, the experiments suggest that quantum objects are as definite as droplets,
_S3: and that they too are guided by pilot waves — in this case, fluid-like undulations in space and time.
_S4: physicists [] misinterpret [John Stewart Bell] as rendering hidden variables impossible. But Bell supported pilot-wave theory.
_S5: Couder and his colleagues placed a magnet at the center of their oil bath and observed a magnetic ferrofluid droplet. Like an electron occupying fixed energy levels around a nucleus, the bouncing droplet adopted a discrete set of stable orbits around the magnet, each characterized by a set energy level and angular momentum.
_S6: The “quantization” of these properties into discrete packets is usually understood as a defining feature of the quantum realm.
_S7: Could we be deceiving ourselves by insisting that all phenomenon be physical as we understand it?
_S8: Sparky (Jul10): [] http://www.cheniere.org/references/brokensymmetry.htm
_L7: Anything that doesn’t have radius or mass is space (vacuum) or time. The physical seems to consist of matter, space and time._S9: That's why a dipolar permanent magnet, with opposite magnetic charges on its ends locked in there by the material itself, continuously exhibits magnetic field in the space surrounding it (out to the ends of the universe, if the magnet has been around long enough).
_S10: There is a continuous and steady stream of EM energy, extracted directly from the vacuum and integrated into observable magnetic field energy, pouring forth from the dipolarity of that magnet.
_S11: At any external point in that stream, the steady flow will give a steady or "static" reading for the magnetic field and thus for the intensity of the flow at that point.
_L12: And photons are real objects, having radius and mass._S12: Every EM field and its energy, and every EM potential and its energy, are thus continuous outflows of real photons and real EM energy from the source charges.
_S13: Every observable joule of EM energy in the universe is and has been extracted directly from the seething virtual state vacuum by its associated source charges.
Proof of a charge field or his charge field?MM: No, just more proof of my charge field.
Sparky,Proof of a charge field or his charge field?MM: No, just more proof of my charge field.
With all of the strange, if not absurd, explanations of his charge field, the critical mind should become suspicious of everything MM comes up with. But, do all minds? Obviously not. It is surprising to see otherwise intelligent people getting caught up in the power of "knowing for sure", being taught by one who "knows."
And there is no way of Delicately addressing this with the truth. So, soak yourselves in something soothing, and repeat MM's mantra, "I understand and know, and can prove it".
You will be partially correct....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests
