http://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2013/03 ... icrowaves/
Electrical current filaments in space do provide the microwave background in general. But to understand two anomalies,(The CMBR Dipole Anisotropy, and the Low Multipole Anomaly mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_mic ... _radiation), we must understand the output from one filament alone. That is the filament around which we are spiraling.
In the low multipole controversy, there seems to be an unexplained alignment of the microwave background,and the ecliptic plane. This is of course a problem to the mainstream. Why should "cosmic" scale microwaves, have any correlation to the ecliptic. This is still a problem for EU, if we assume the microwave output is coming from assorted filaments in the sun's vicinity. The problem goes away when we see the major filament driving the sun's motion, and the solar system's orientation to that current.
Let's start with a picture of the local chimney: http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/chimney.htm
There are only three details we need to know. 1.We are in the chimney 2. the axis of the chimney is defined by the Pleiades stellar moving group coming down through the chimney 3. The Pleiades cluster is located ~4 degrees off the ecliptic plane, in other words, our solar system is nearly edge on to that pleiades current stream. This is not a coincidence (solar system is edge on,if sun's filament spirals around the Pleiades) . The Pleiades filament (huge)is responsible for the main microwave output we are seeing.
In other words, it's not that the microwave background is aligned with the ecliptic directly. The microwave background comes from the Pleiades current filament. Our solar system spirals nearly edge on around this filament. Therefore, the ecliptic is aligned with the background microwaves.
Redshifts and Microwaves
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Re: Redshifts and Microwaves
The CMBR dipole anisotropy is interesting in that the microwaves are hotter in the direction we are supposedly heading (at 620 km/s). Of course, we know if the microwaves are from local filaments, we are not really moving through them at 620 km/s. You may jump in and say it's plasma redshift. The question becomes, "why is the CMBR not hotter in the redshifted direction?"
The mainstream sees, for example, hot microwave background absorption near high redshift objects. They say high redshifted objects are distant, and therefore we see them back in time, when the universe was hotter. We may say instead, high redshift is caused by high plasma density, and that same plasma is responsible for the hot microwave output. The point is, both EU and mainstream see and can explain the high redshift/hot microwave correlation.
With the microwave background dipole anisotropy, we have the opposite relationship. The high redshift microwaves, are in the cooler microwave direction.
The mainstream sees, for example, hot microwave background absorption near high redshift objects. They say high redshifted objects are distant, and therefore we see them back in time, when the universe was hotter. We may say instead, high redshift is caused by high plasma density, and that same plasma is responsible for the hot microwave output. The point is, both EU and mainstream see and can explain the high redshift/hot microwave correlation.
With the microwave background dipole anisotropy, we have the opposite relationship. The high redshift microwaves, are in the cooler microwave direction.
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Re: Redshifts and Microwaves
Just to make the last point clear. In general, when we look out at high redshift objects,we see a hot "cosmic" microwave background, just as mentioned here: http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.0844
This is not a surprise, if current filaments provide the microwaves, with plasma densities providing the redshift.
In the case of the dipole anisotropy, we have high redshift in one direction,more redshift in the opposite direction. Remember,however, we are INSIDE the walls of the filament. See the first picture here: http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/chimney.htm We know that microwave emission comes from the inverted populations, where the hot sparse plasma filament meets the walls. We look out to the walls, in towards increasing plasma densities. The reason we see the microwave background as uniform as we do, is because we are surrounded by the wall of dense neutral material. But we are not centered in it. We look out in one direction,to the nearest point of the wall, and in the opposite direction, to the central axis towards which all the electrons and ions drift. Hot at the wall, redshift towards center.
This is not a surprise, if current filaments provide the microwaves, with plasma densities providing the redshift.
In the case of the dipole anisotropy, we have high redshift in one direction,more redshift in the opposite direction. Remember,however, we are INSIDE the walls of the filament. See the first picture here: http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/chimney.htm We know that microwave emission comes from the inverted populations, where the hot sparse plasma filament meets the walls. We look out to the walls, in towards increasing plasma densities. The reason we see the microwave background as uniform as we do, is because we are surrounded by the wall of dense neutral material. But we are not centered in it. We look out in one direction,to the nearest point of the wall, and in the opposite direction, to the central axis towards which all the electrons and ions drift. Hot at the wall, redshift towards center.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests