Shouldn't that second "euclidian" be "non-euclidian" ?In Euclidian space, R=r. But the space of General Relativity—and of black holes—is Euclidian.
Either that, or get rid of the "but."
If there isn't a typo, I don't know how to read the quote.
vampire astronomy (typo ?)
-
bdw000
- Posts: 307
- Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2008 5:06 pm
vampire astronomy (typo ?)
Either that, or get rid of the "but."
If there isn't a typo, I don't know how to read the quote.
-
Total Science
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:10 am
Re: vampire astronomy (typo ?)
Yes. General Relativity is based upon Non-Euclidean geometry. Specifically, Riemannian geometry.
Of course, Riemannian geometry is pure idealism and mathematical fantasy and not a material physical reality which is yet another reason why we throw Relativity into the garbage can.
According to Lobachevsky Theorem 20, "If in any triangle the sum of the three angles is equal to two right angles, so is this the case for every other triangle." -- Nikolai I. Lobachevsky, mathematician, 1840
Therefore, not only has Relativity been falsified by empirical experience but it is absurd mathematically as well.
Of course, Riemannian geometry is pure idealism and mathematical fantasy and not a material physical reality which is yet another reason why we throw Relativity into the garbage can.
According to Lobachevsky Theorem 20, "If in any triangle the sum of the three angles is equal to two right angles, so is this the case for every other triangle." -- Nikolai I. Lobachevsky, mathematician, 1840
Therefore, not only has Relativity been falsified by empirical experience but it is absurd mathematically as well.
"The ancients possessed a plasma cosmology and physics themselves, and from laboratory experiments, were well familiar with the patterns exhibited by Peratt's petroglyphs." -- Joseph P. Farrell, author, 2007
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests