Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?
Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer
-
folaht
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 9:38 am
Unread post
by folaht » Sun Jan 27, 2019 2:13 pm
..or double lobed.
Known
Very small
Large
My suggestions
Large
- Oumuamua (Cigar shape was based on it's brightness and bi-lobate is probably not considered as common in gravitational science.)
Planetary sized
- Earth and Moon. - They're said to be similar in composition right? https://www.latimes.com/science/science ... story.html
- Pluto and Charon. - They look like a mini-earth and mini-moon, so perhaps they are.
- Many other exoplanets. - Thus I also predict we'll be able to at least find exoplanets that are still attached to their moons.
Since 1 % 1, 1 * 1 and 1 - 1 do not add up, we must conclude that 1 + 1 is 3.
-
Maol
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:40 pm
Unread post
by Maol » Sun Jan 27, 2019 8:12 pm
With N & S magnetic poles an external electromagnetic force could accelerate rotation, like an armature in an electric motor, until eventually the centrifugal force would stretch them apart.
-
Webbman
- Posts: 533
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:49 am
Unread post
by Webbman » Sat Feb 09, 2019 6:42 am
given that all the planets have a center ring/disc as a result of magnetic n and s poles would it not be reasonable to expect that a constriction is also possible here and would lead to a lobed structure.
in my view this lobed type structure is the same structure a neutron would have being constricted in the middle by an electron ring.
its all lies.
-
nick c
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2483
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
- Location: connecticut
Unread post
by nick c » Sat Feb 09, 2019 10:03 am
If the Moon and Earth were originally one object, and the Moon separated from the Earth, then I would expect that the lunar orbit would be in the plane of the Earth's equator, but it is not.
The Moon appears from Earth to move through the ecliptic, which is the plane of the Sun. Most moons in the Solar System orbit in the primary's equatorial plane. Those that don't are considered to be captured objects.
So, while not conclusive, that seems to me to support the theory that the Moon was a preexisting solar system object which was captured by the Earth.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests