Design NASA Missions

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Locked
4realScience
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:20 pm

Design NASA Missions

Post by 4realScience » Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:38 pm

Do we have NASA scientists that are on-board with EU theory? I think we do. Let's work with them. Hi guys!

Let's think up EU experiments NASA could do, perhaps as add-ons, to missions they are already building. Some of these might be trivial in cost, just software.

I got one. How about exploring the reason our deep space missions, such as to Jupiter and beyond, are experiencing unaccounted off-course accelerations? (Some _others_ have suggested dark matter is involved, inside our solar system.) Here's an experiment: send out a probe that can receive a MATTER (electron, proton, neutron, or neutrino) beam sent from earth orbit (Space Station, ISS?). Pick a probe that is going beyond Earth orbit, say to one of the Trojan Lagrange points, the ones that lie in the path of the Earth's orbit but are 60 degrees (of the 360) either fore or aft of the Earth in its orbit (we have telescopes there now). We should be able to send the beam to an on-board detector on the probe. In this experiment we would be looking to see 'beam deflection'. From ISS, we would vary the aim of the beam until the probe could detect it. THEN we could compare the beam's projection angle to a straight line (more or less, compensated speed of light and all). This would show bending of the matter beam as only governed by EU theory, I think. Am I wrong? It would show the effect of the solar electric field on matter traveling inside the solar system and would I think include/explain the anomalous slow-down the dark matter proponents point out.

Are there other easier more fundamental EU confirmation experiments we can think of?

User avatar
Jarvamundo
Posts: 612
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:26 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Design NASA Missions

Post by Jarvamundo » Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:45 am

You ever seen that movie "twister", where they fling 1,000s of probes to map a twister...

Recon we can fire 1,000 langmuir probe units (a cloud of em) at a comet and map it's charge?

The way i see it, comets are going to be the most accessible objects to man that carry charge seperation and double-layers to explore. Some would get annihilated, some would curve around and measure the tail.... charge readings all the way... relay data back to a set of camera-snappin-motherships that send it back to us..

works perfectly in my mind... ;-)

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests