NASA's Voyager I hit by third solar 'tsunami'

[D_Archer]

From Cnet:
https://www.cnet.com/news/nasas-voyager ... r-tsunami/

NASA's Voyager I spacecraft has been steadily journeying away from the sun to the outer reaches of the solar system since its 1977 launch. As it travels farther out and enters a different region of the solar system, it's occasionally affected by coronal mass ejections -- shock waves caused from massive violent eruptions from our sun

the solar wind pushes back the dense plasma of space in a sort of protective bubble. This plasma was ejected into the universe by the death of stars millions of years ago.

Comment: plasma ejected from millions of stars years ago is a massive assumption, more likely, interstellar space is more dense plasma See next quote.

The plasma outside the heliosphere is about 40 times denser than the plasma that lies inside it

Comment: Interesting to know.

While the plasma wave instrument lets us measure the frequency of this ringing, the cosmic ray instrument reveals what struck the bell -- the shock wave from the sun."

Sounds like an E/M push effect

Voyager captures sound: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIAZWb9_si4
---

So interstellar space (at least close to our heliosphere) is more dense plasma and we know about the G Cloud and our Sun being just a small part of an immense structure.

Can EU predict what happens next?

Regards,
Daniel

[jacmac]

The Article quoted:

The plasma outside the heliosphere is about 40 times denser than the plasma that lies inside it

If we assume the same density of plasma within (and throughout) the heliosphere as outside, but the inside plasma is concentrated at or near the sun, is this enough plasma to power the sun? Would Dr. Scott's drift current model work with this much plasma ? Does it put us in the ballpark ? My science/math skills are not up to the task of figuring this out.
Jack

[kell1990]

The Article quoted:

The plasma outside the heliosphere is about 40 times denser than the plasma that lies inside it

If we assume the same density of plasma within (and throughout) the heliosphere as outside, but the inside plasma is concentrated at or near the sun, is this enough plasma to power the sun? Would Dr. Scott's drift current model work with this much plasma ? Does it put us in the ballpark ? My science/math skills are not up to the task of figuring this out.
Jack

Well, according to NASA, the external density of the cosmos is 40 times the density of that inside the sun's "towing capacity". That is to say that the sun, as it moves through the cosmos, creates a "bowshock" (we knew that already) but then it encounters another region that is 40 times as dense as it is, then...what?

Does that mean that all the previous pronouncements about the cosmos being a vast nothingness are a bunch of crap? It would seem to me to be the case.

How in the world does NASA continue to promulgate this nonsense, when it knows perfectly well that what it is claiming can't stand even the most minor challenge (like this one)?

The entire Earth could use some better knowledge skills, whether they are declared by NASA, or the ESA, or the Russians or the Chinese. If anyone knows something, then say something,

[Cargo]

Yes, we need more High Wizard Math. Maybe. But I tend to think that a different problem is shown when dealing with these statements being translated into reality. If you see the word 'wind' in 'space' then you know something is not being explained correctly and everything that follows will be built on false premises.

So too must we be careful with 'plasma' since it can actually be a Medium depending on the context of the wind invovled. The presence of different densities (amps? volts? watts?) of electric plasma current (wind?) should be totally expected with all the different bodies involved. Stars, Planets, Moons, Comets, Asteroids, etc.. they all have some electric force which both receives and interacts with the surrounding great Cosmological Intergalactic Winds that we can't possible hope to image yet with so much talk about wind in space.