The water bridge does not need to be aligned with the background magnetic field. Your second question was "can such currents only form along existing magnetic field lines?"willendure wrote:Not sure, but yes, if you say so. What is the significance of this observation?celeste wrote:A question in return: In the water bridge experiments, we have what looks (and works?) like a current filament, yet it runs between the two beakers. It does not seem to matter if the water bridge is aligned with the background field in the room, correct?willendure wrote:If charged particles flow through non-magnetised space will they form Birkeland current? Or can such currents only form along existing magnetic field lines?
What conditions are necessary for Birkeland currents?
-
celeste
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Re: What conditions are necessary for Birkeland currents?
-
celeste
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:41 pm
- Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Re: What conditions are necessary for Birkeland currents?
With the water bridge, they found ions spiraling around the surface. This is the same type of motion our solar system has as it travels along the surface of the local interstellar cloud. And it is this radial charge separation, that holds the filament together.BeAChooser wrote:Does it really act like a Birkeland filament?celeste wrote:In the water bridge experiments, we have what looks (and works?) like a current filament, yet it runs between the two beakers.
Can water bridges do this (observe the helical winding in pairs of Birkeland filaments)?
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/ ... Nebula.jpg
I have not seen experiments where they bring two distinct water bridges together. That would be interesting to see.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests