That's typical actually, because it's so hard to believe at first. The mainstream has simply ignores the electrical components and the electrical activity in spacetime. That is true as it relates to solar physics, it's true as it relates to magnetosphere modeling, and that's true as it relates to anything and everything outside of the solar system as well. They simply ignore the role of electricity as it runs through the plasma, and the E field that sustains that current flow process.comingfrom wrote:Thank you, Micheal. I needed help because I can't explain it so scientifically.
And your explanation helps me too.
The electric fields of stars and planets are rarely, if ever, mentioned.
I mean, I've been reading about this denial for a while, thanks to the Thunderbolts Project, but the pure vacuum of even a mention E fields is really hitting me now.
That's why the heating of the solar corona remains an enigma to them, 100 years *after* Birkeland explained it to them. The excess heat comes from the current flowing between the sun and the heliosphere, and the E field that exists between the sun and the heliosphere. There's no "mystery" as to the heating of the corona, the heating of coronal loops in general, or the heating of plasma in labs on Earth. It's almost exclusively related to current and electricity.
Keep in mind that almost all of of their own experiments on so called "magnetic reconnection" typically begin by them using electricity, E fields, and current to create two current carrying filaments in plasma. They then move the filaments closer together, bring the two current carrying filaments closer and closer together until they simply rewire themselves as currents seek the path of least resistance through a double layer. They then turn off the power, and the whole "reconnection" thing stops instantly, along with both current carrying filaments, and then they call it "magnetic reconnection". I kid you not.
What astronomers and astrophysicists do not understand about spacetime could fill volumes, and their ignorance as to role of E fields in high energy processes is simply unbelievable. That's also why Lambda-CDM is 95 percent supernatural construct, and only 5 percent empirical physics. Even when they try to model the behaviors of high temperature plasma in space, they typically resort to a form of pure "pseudoscience", according to the Nobel Prize winning author of MHD theory (Alfven). They really are that clueless. It's almost a 100 percent physics mystery to them. Even they can't seem to agree on which version of "reconnection" might apply! Honestly, they don't understand the physics because they won't look at the E field.
The role of electricity, and the E field in high temperature plasma is well documented in the lab, including most of the lab experiments that astronomers call "magnetic reconnection". Most of them wouldn't even work without current and the E field that drives the whole process, and heats the plasma, and creates the filaments in the first place. They simply convert all the E's in Maxwell's equations to B's, and then they literally *pretend* that the B field does all the work. Hoy Vey. They then turn off the electricity to their so called experiment on "magnetic reconnection" and instantly the whole reconnection process terminates, along with both current carrying filaments that supposedly "reconnected". It's really that ridiculous.
The magnetic fields do play a role in attracting the current current streams but the existence of both current streams is predicated upon the existence of an E field and current!
The mathematics simply confuses them. Once they convert the various E components in the equations to B's, they erroneously believe (and publicly claim) that they've demonstrated that magnetism drives the process, even though they require an E field in virtually every lab experiment. Even their "laser" experiment simply creates two current carrying filaments in the plasma, and the filaments "rewire" themselves over time through an ordinary double layer. It "'should" be called "current reconnection", or "particle reconnection", or just ordinary "double layer" processes between two filaments as described in Alfven's double layer paper.
Magnetic fields not even form in tiny little "lines" as they imagine them, they form in entire 3D fields. The whole magnetic reconnection claim is silly in the final analysis, since their own lab experiments are driven by E fields and current.
Make no mistake about it, in the lab, and everywhere else in nature, the E field drives the parade. The mainstream consistently puts the magnetic cart in front of the electrical horse, and they can't figure out why it doesn't seem to work right.
The funny part is, that they literally use electricity, E fields and current to *heat* plasma into the plasma state, and sustain it in the plasma state in the lab in the first place. They have to heat various elements with E fields and current into the plasma state just so they can start learning about "plasma physics". Somehow they imagine that the E field which sustains and heats those plasmas is irrelevant in the plasmas of spacetime. It's ridiculous that they ignore the role of electricity in the process, but they do so consistently, and intentionally at this point.
It has an effect to be sure, but gravity does seem to be the dominant player. Perhaps we will get to an agreed upon "theory of everything" that explains gravity via EM fields, so in the final analysis, you may be exactly correct. For now I would say that gravity is the primary player, and EM fields may "stabilize" things as you put it, but gravity theory explains a lot in solar system physics.I think,
It's the Sun's E field that stabilizes the orbits of the planets.
Peratt has some *excellent* computer modeling papers that are available in the public domain. I suggest you read them. He's literally created various galactic formations in his plasma modeling software. All that is required to generate such mass layouts in plasma is a recognition of the role of electricity in space. Once you embrace electricity, the need for exotic forms of matter and energy goes flying right out the window.It's an E field that maintains the structure of the galaxy.
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpB ... =3&t=15850
Keep in mind that the mainstream *grossly* miscounted entire stars in that 2006 lensing paper that claimed to find "proof" of 'dark matter". They botched the stellar count by a whopping factor of between 3 and 20 depending on the type of star and the type of galaxy. There's no doubt that there is in fact "missing mass" in their seriously flawed baryonic mass estimation techniques from 2006. They've demonstrated it repeatedly over the past 8 years. Even still, all you need to get plasma to form galaxies and mass layouts as we observe in space is to add current and E fields to the equations.
Alfven explains it in terms of circuit theory, and I think that's an appropriate way to look at it. His papers are also freely available for the most part.Planets have their own E fields.
http://thesurfaceofthesun.com/Alfven/
Absolutely. Once you turn on the E field, anything and everything starts to make sense. The moment Birkeland fired up his electric sun, and turned on the electricity, he created high energy coronal loops, a glowing corona, polar jets, high speed solar wind, and all the observations we see in solar satellite imagery today.Structures within structures within structures.
Does that sound right to any you?
If you put various wavelengths of light together in solar images, you find that the coronal loops rise up and through the surface of the photosphere, leaving their magnetic field signature and heat signature on that surface. The magnetic field signatures can be seen in SDO magnetogram images. The heat signatures of the loops as the flow through the solar atmosphere can be seen in 1600 and 1700A images. Helioviewer will let you put them together in real time, so you can watch the relationship in real time. The coronal loops are sustained and driven by circuits that begin *way* below the photosphere and that connect below the surface of the photosphere. All the solar imagery I've seen in all the various satellite imagery all supports the electric universe theory. Nothing about what we observe should be a "mystery", since Birkeland built a working model of it all over 100 years ago in his lab.
http://helioviewer.org/#
He created aurora in the lab too, and used electric universe theory to explain the high energy events in planetary physics too. Almost every high energy event we observe in nature is driven by electricity and E fields. When the mainstream finally figures that out, they'll have to admit to themselves, and to the world, that they've been clueless now for *generations*. At the moment, their collective pride won't let them do that. Sooner or later however, it's going to happen. Make no mistake about it.
In the meantime, whatever you do, do *not* allow them to belittle you, or attack you personally or get away with claiming that there is no math to support EU/PC theory. They will tell you BS from day one, and hand you more BS in every single conversation. What they cannot seem to do unfortunately is accept and account for the role of electricity in space plasmas.
)
I mean, highways are man made too, don't they know?
).