Astronomers Spot Unusual Jet

[comingfrom]

I wonder if this counts as "professional misconduct", in the eyes of others.
I would nominate Sci-News.com for a professional misconduct award.

This seems to be the formula:
Astronomers spotted something, so here, have an artists impression of what we reckon they must be looking at.

http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/pgc43 ... 03467.html

Impressive picture, but (now that my eyes are opened to an EU) jets (and radio signals) would be normal phenomenon in the highly charged dense plasma found at the centers of galaxies, and wouldn't require supermassive black holes to form.

Rather than give us the details of the observations made, they give us what they concluded, based upon the theories and assumptions they have been taught to believe.
The best actual picture of that galaxy, linked in the article, shows it as a tiny yellow blob.
No images of the actual jets spotted are linked.

These is no way the artist impression can be confirmed or denied, because the fact is, there is no way anyone can really know, precisely what is happening at the center of that distant galaxy.
Likewise few would dispute artists' impressions of a flat Earth before telescopes were invented.
But today, there are alternative theories, to the electrically flat Universe.

Another example here
http://www.sci-news.com/astronomy/scien ... 03365.html

This one even includes an animated artist impression from NASA Astrophysics.
Science, from the artists at NASA!

Which causes me to wonder (and LOL); do we need more and better artists, to make the electric Universe more widely known and accepted?

[SDK]

Unfortunately, this is the trend. I find it more and more difficult to get experimental descriptions and the raw data. What we are fed by the mainstream are some "bottom line" constructs slapped together from some undisclosed experimental observations and theoretical extrapolations. Mind you, this tendency does not concern only physics. If you want to get to the nuts and bolts of the raw data for your own evaluation, you gotta pay not even knowing upfront, what you may get.

With kind regards, Slavek.