I came across this artifact image in a Graham Hancock video. It occurs to me that it could be a 'squatterman'. If so, the importance is in its age - reputed to be circa 35,000 years ago. If there is geological evidence of a catastrophe around that time.... etc.
Possible "Squatter Man" at Gobekli Tepe
-
allancw
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2015 5:56 pm
- Location: On the road
- Contact:
- neilwilkes
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:30 am
- Location: London, England
- Contact:
Re: Possible "Squatter Man" at Gobekli Tepe
It was buried - deliberately - circa 9600 BCE, which also happens to coincide (yeah) with the onset of the Younger Dryas cooling, where temperatures plummeted in just a few short, terrible years almost eliminating mankind (and very possibly wiping out an advanced civilization at the same time - the cause now seems to be pretty much cut & dried as a truly monstrous cometary impact that had it's epicentre over Canada but affected the entire globe with anywhere from a dozen to as many as 29 impactors in one awful event (think Shoemaker/Levy).LunarSabbathTruth wrote:I agree that the sand which covered Gobekli Tepe came from the sky. The "deliberate burial" theory is pretty lame, but at least archaeologists don't say that the citizens of Pompey deliberately buried their city; some recognition of catastrophes is better than none at all.philalethes wrote:On Gobekli Tepe: ....
I have certainly drifted from from Gobekli Tepe (10,000 BC) to the crazed migrations in 1500 BC. But both display to me the effects of Proto-Saturn disruptions. In Gobekli Tepe no one knows why the people supposedly covered or buried the structures back up. But it may well be this rained from the sky. This also connects to the vast underground cave systems in Turkey. All in the area of UR, ancient homeland dimly remembered.
....
I think it was much more recent than 10000 BC. I do not believe any dating techniques other than historical references, due to the fact that the catastrophes themselves and the different initial conditions do not correspond to the assumptions made with those dating methods. (Even the counting of tree rings is inaccurate, because it assumes normal yearly conditions.)
- joe
There were airbursts as well as imapcts straight into the ice sheets at the time, triggering catastrophic flooding the results of which are still plainly visible (channeled scablands etc) right across the North American continent.
The Taurid streams are the debris field and it is well known there are several large (20km plus) objects in the stream to this day, although they are not supposed to be a threat - according to the uniformitarians, of course.
Another very interesting coincidence is that the time of this impact event also happens to match Solon's tale of the end of Atlantis.
You will never get a man to understand something his salary depends on him not understanding.
-
danikutya
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:18 am
Re: Possible "Squatter Man" at Gobekli Tepe
https://youtu.be/Q9cGD0zBGaU
Here is some other squatter men, owl eyes and circle drawings on a cliff wall, from Bolivia.The cliffs seems to me on this video to be a ruined megalithic wall, and the ruined chullpas of the preinca cemetery also seems to be melted...
May be, this drawings can give some clue to decide the age of these cultures and sites...?
Here is some other squatter men, owl eyes and circle drawings on a cliff wall, from Bolivia.The cliffs seems to me on this video to be a ruined megalithic wall, and the ruined chullpas of the preinca cemetery also seems to be melted...
May be, this drawings can give some clue to decide the age of these cultures and sites...?
-
Dyrnwyn
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 5:16 pm
Re: Possible "Squatter Man" at Gobekli Tepe
According to Andrew Collins, construction of Gobekli Tepe began at 9500 BC and the place was abandoned in 8000 BC.neilwilkes wrote: It was buried - deliberately - circa 9600 BCE
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests