I am not sure that I quite understand you. Could you please explain. Thanks.Kevin said: think of a matrix, of fibonacci sequence, where main points will be tracable as of a fibonacci position. Then try to think of everything been to this self same design, just to scale. Everything is one, made from one, just as you are, to fibonacci scale.
Cosmology of LaViolette
-
lizzie
- Guest
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
-
kevin
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Lizzie,
I am trying to explain, but words are inadequate, especially when written by Me.
How do you describe been in love, or a sense, life, a feeling?
3D facts and accountable occurances are simple, and there are millions of accountants to perform each and every such occurance.
But once you step out of that comfort zone, and into the unknown, the unseen, the invisable, well then it gets a bit more difficult.
I will have a think, and try and better explain with LaViolette in mind.
kevin
I am trying to explain, but words are inadequate, especially when written by Me.
How do you describe been in love, or a sense, life, a feeling?
3D facts and accountable occurances are simple, and there are millions of accountants to perform each and every such occurance.
But once you step out of that comfort zone, and into the unknown, the unseen, the invisable, well then it gets a bit more difficult.
I will have a think, and try and better explain with LaViolette in mind.
kevin
-
lizzie
- Guest
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Yes, I do understand. That's where I seem to dwell these days - between the visible and the invisible worlds. I guess I was curious to know what you were trying to convey since I feel you had a reason for saying what you did. I think of "every day reality" as the matrix. Once you step outside of the matrix, things start to make sense; but then you are left on the outside looking it; and everyone on the "inside" thinks you are the one who is "out of sync".Kevin said: But once you step out of that comfort zone, and into the unknown, the unseen, the invisible, well then it gets a bit more difficult.
-
Grey Cloud
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
- Location: NW UK
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Lizzie,
Kevin wrote:
LaViolette is saying that the intelligence behind these signals is external to the pulsars (from ET) but I, and I think Kevin, believe that the pulsar (or star) is the intelligence. Or, put another way, these stars are fulfilling their role in the grand scheme of things. They know what they are doing, even if we don't.
In one of your recent posts there was something about Betelgeuse(?) and the relationship with the chakras of the human body. Following that line of thought, then these pulsars may well be performing some function in the cosmos which has an analog in the human body; which has an analog with cells; which has an analog with the way atoms behave; etc.
As Junglelord is fond of saying, the Universe is speaking to us but it's not speaking English. I personally feel that what it is telling us, everywhere and all the time, is so simple that it is going below our radar so to speak. I am totally convinced that complicated mathematical equations are not required in the least (though the Universe will communicate with us on that level if required because, ultimately, we are the Universe). See the last two lines of my signature and Kevin's Dowsing and the Lattice thread for more details.
Kevin wrote:
I don't want to put words into Kevin's mouth but I think I understand and agree with what he is suggesting.Lizzie,
Thank you for that link.
instead of thinking these signals are from anyone or et, think of a matrix, of fibonacci sequence, where main points will be tracable as of a fibonacci position.
Then try to think of everything been to this self same design, just to scale.
Everything is one, made from one, just as you are, to fibonacci scale.
Kevin
LaViolette is saying that the intelligence behind these signals is external to the pulsars (from ET) but I, and I think Kevin, believe that the pulsar (or star) is the intelligence. Or, put another way, these stars are fulfilling their role in the grand scheme of things. They know what they are doing, even if we don't.
In one of your recent posts there was something about Betelgeuse(?) and the relationship with the chakras of the human body. Following that line of thought, then these pulsars may well be performing some function in the cosmos which has an analog in the human body; which has an analog with cells; which has an analog with the way atoms behave; etc.
As Junglelord is fond of saying, the Universe is speaking to us but it's not speaking English. I personally feel that what it is telling us, everywhere and all the time, is so simple that it is going below our radar so to speak. I am totally convinced that complicated mathematical equations are not required in the least (though the Universe will communicate with us on that level if required because, ultimately, we are the Universe). See the last two lines of my signature and Kevin's Dowsing and the Lattice thread for more details.
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
-
lizzie
- Guest
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Oh, I understand. I agree with you. I see the pulsars as intelligence as well; and it does seem as if everything has a role to play in the grand scheme of things.Grey Cloud said: LaViolette is saying that the intelligence behind these signals is external to the pulsars (from ET) but I, and I think Kevin, believe that the pulsar (or star) is the intelligence. Or, put another way, these stars are fulfilling their role in the grand scheme of things. They know what they are doing, even if we don't.
-
moses
- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:18 pm
- Location: Adelaide
- Contact:
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Paul LaViolette
He uses an energetic event of around the time of the Younger Dryas
as an indication of a galactic superwave hitting Earth at that time.
However EU says that this was an electrical interplanetary event.
He suggests that the uneven distribution of pulsars suggests
intelligent intent, whereas EU would have pulsars forming in
electrically active areas which would not be randomly distributed.
A gamma ray burst generates a kind of galactic wave. The connection
between the very bright GRB and the extremely massive 2004 Indian
Ocean earthquake is too strong to overlook. The power of superwaves
in other galaxies is probably extremely overestimated due to the
estimated distances to other galaxies being grossly wrong.
In my present theory I have an interplanetary event occurring at
the above time before the Younger Dryas. This produced the mountains
of the Rockies and Andes and wiped out the very ancient inhabitants
of the Americas, and a few other species as well.
Before EU I was a LaViolette fan, and I still can't readily dismiss
galactic superwaves, but interplanetary electrics is easily
powerful enough to explain the past, and it definitely happened.
I'd expect that humanity only became interested in the Galactic
Centre when studying the stars and planets trying to predict a
close encounter with another planet.
Mo
He uses an energetic event of around the time of the Younger Dryas
as an indication of a galactic superwave hitting Earth at that time.
However EU says that this was an electrical interplanetary event.
He suggests that the uneven distribution of pulsars suggests
intelligent intent, whereas EU would have pulsars forming in
electrically active areas which would not be randomly distributed.
A gamma ray burst generates a kind of galactic wave. The connection
between the very bright GRB and the extremely massive 2004 Indian
Ocean earthquake is too strong to overlook. The power of superwaves
in other galaxies is probably extremely overestimated due to the
estimated distances to other galaxies being grossly wrong.
In my present theory I have an interplanetary event occurring at
the above time before the Younger Dryas. This produced the mountains
of the Rockies and Andes and wiped out the very ancient inhabitants
of the Americas, and a few other species as well.
Before EU I was a LaViolette fan, and I still can't readily dismiss
galactic superwaves, but interplanetary electrics is easily
powerful enough to explain the past, and it definitely happened.
I'd expect that humanity only became interested in the Galactic
Centre when studying the stars and planets trying to predict a
close encounter with another planet.
Mo
- GaryN
- Posts: 2668
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:18 pm
- Location: Sooke, BC, Canada
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
by moses on Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:07 pm

by moses on Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:07 pm
In order to change an existing paradigm you do not struggle to try and change the problematic model. You create a new model and make the old one obsolete. -Buckminster Fuller
-
mague
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 2:44 am
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
How do you check if a cup is ok ?junglelord wrote:His studies of cosmic cataclysmic cycles and galactic core superwave events are interesting. His view of previous civilizations leaving clues to this cyclic event is interesting and reminds me of Dave Talbott's work some what. Not to compare them in any way shape or form, mind you. Maybe this is the link to 2012, but its very interesting reading. He does not believe in the big bang, he does believe in a constant universe that creates matter.
You take a spoon and create a pulse by hitting the cup with the spoon. Either its "bliiiiiiing" or "tschoook".
There you go, cyclic pulses and frequencies and all
People checked the power transmissions and wheels of steam locomotives by hitting it with a hammer. Nowadays we use x-rays.
But thats just the basic design. There is a better one.
By introducing a devil you can ask your components how they think about a failure, a day slaking of or about a rebellion against the rules of their function.
Yeah, its a bit
-
Grey Cloud
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
- Location: NW UK
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Hi Mo,
Good post.
Only thing I would add is that gamma rays are EM too. To a certain extent, the cause is academic, it is the effect that is important.
My own take on all these various alternative theories is that none of them are 100% correct.
Also, common sense tells me that the centre of the galaxy is important in terms of what is happening in the galaxy.
Good post.
Only thing I would add is that gamma rays are EM too. To a certain extent, the cause is academic, it is the effect that is important.
My own take on all these various alternative theories is that none of them are 100% correct.
Also, common sense tells me that the centre of the galaxy is important in terms of what is happening in the galaxy.
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
-
Grey Cloud
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
- Location: NW UK
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Hi Gary,
I don't want to be negative but I think your rabbit shadow-puppet needs more work, if not a complete re-think.
It should look more like this:
I don't want to be negative but I think your rabbit shadow-puppet needs more work, if not a complete re-think.
- Attachments
-
- Rabbit.jpg (2.64 KiB) Viewed 9080 times
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
-
mague
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 2:44 am
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
I stumbled across LaViolette in a completely different context and did read him a bit.
I think hes got some good points there. I doubt there are regular super novae. But the bursts sound plausible and there are other sources possible.
I dont see how it can be a problem that EU and wave event happened at the same time. The burst creates an EM wave as well.
One thing though. Before people start to interpret animals they should first understand the animals. The whole Hathor and bull symbolism is dull. No farmer ever would create such symbolism. Cows are usually not aggressive. Why do people always think of the taunted bull instead of the bull in his natural mood ? Ole ? The greatest danger of a bull is that he kills you by accident. Without any aggression he might turn a bit in his box and press you against the wall. He doesnt even recognize you. The bull is a "blind" force. Thats why minotaur is the dangerous bull in the labyrinth. He is a froce walking up and down the labyrinth and kills you because the walls are to narrow.
The cow is a beautiful animal. Ever seen the eyes of a cow ? Cows have a lot of soft, female, caring attributes. Cow is a symbol of source. A huge udder and 4 nipples. In that regard i agree with LaViolette that Hathor was the source of the wave. But the bull is not another wave. He is the blind force confining Hathors ejected energy. Female and male cows ? Opposite forces ? Hello ?
And it is possible to "jump" the bull symbolically. At least for those who understand.
I think hes got some good points there. I doubt there are regular super novae. But the bursts sound plausible and there are other sources possible.
I dont see how it can be a problem that EU and wave event happened at the same time. The burst creates an EM wave as well.
One thing though. Before people start to interpret animals they should first understand the animals. The whole Hathor and bull symbolism is dull. No farmer ever would create such symbolism. Cows are usually not aggressive. Why do people always think of the taunted bull instead of the bull in his natural mood ? Ole ? The greatest danger of a bull is that he kills you by accident. Without any aggression he might turn a bit in his box and press you against the wall. He doesnt even recognize you. The bull is a "blind" force. Thats why minotaur is the dangerous bull in the labyrinth. He is a froce walking up and down the labyrinth and kills you because the walls are to narrow.
The cow is a beautiful animal. Ever seen the eyes of a cow ? Cows have a lot of soft, female, caring attributes. Cow is a symbol of source. A huge udder and 4 nipples. In that regard i agree with LaViolette that Hathor was the source of the wave. But the bull is not another wave. He is the blind force confining Hathors ejected energy. Female and male cows ? Opposite forces ? Hello ?
And it is possible to "jump" the bull symbolically. At least for those who understand.
-
Grey Cloud
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
- Location: NW UK
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Hi folks,
A few thoughts on bovine symbolism, dedicated to ox-eyed Hera.
The cow symbolises sustenance and specifically passive or non-judgemental sustenance. The cow produces the milk 'automatically' (the food is produced from within the cow) and the calf is free to suckle whenever it wants. The food is always there and is never refused.
Other animals, e.g. birds or a wolf, have to go out and about obtaining food for their offspring and of necessity, the offspring cannot feed until the parent has come up with the food.
Mother Goddesses are usually associated with cows, or alternately a human female with multiple pairs of breasts or one pair of huge breasts.
The bull symbolises solidity and strength and is associateed with the element Earth, eg. Taurus is an Earth sign. His strength is of a slow, steady kind, as opposed to say, a lion whose strength is associated with power and speed. A charging bull takes a while to get up a full head of steam, whereas the lion can go from nought to lightning in the blink of an eye.
The main male god is genrally called the 'Bull of Heaven' or somesuch. This is a reference to the bull's large testicles and the creative pwoer contained therein (they are seed bags).
Both the cow and the bull are symbolic of the planet Earth in that they represent 'plenty' - lots of meat, lots of milk, horn, leather, etc. The cow has a huge udder and the bull has huge testicles.
The Minotaur is aggressive and dangerous because of his human attributes. He basically has the worst of both worlds. His lower half is bovine which connects him to the Earth, his torso is human so he has a human heart (soul) and his head is bovine which gives him the brains of a bull (animal) and no connection to Heaven. He is trapped.
Compare Centaurs who are associated with Wisdom (I don't know why exactly). They have equine lower bodies (strength, grace of movement) and human torso and head (heart and brains). They are tall (they can see far and the head is closer to Heaven) and they are armed with a bow (they can influence things at a distance from themeselves).
A few thoughts on bovine symbolism, dedicated to ox-eyed Hera.
The cow symbolises sustenance and specifically passive or non-judgemental sustenance. The cow produces the milk 'automatically' (the food is produced from within the cow) and the calf is free to suckle whenever it wants. The food is always there and is never refused.
Other animals, e.g. birds or a wolf, have to go out and about obtaining food for their offspring and of necessity, the offspring cannot feed until the parent has come up with the food.
Mother Goddesses are usually associated with cows, or alternately a human female with multiple pairs of breasts or one pair of huge breasts.
The bull symbolises solidity and strength and is associateed with the element Earth, eg. Taurus is an Earth sign. His strength is of a slow, steady kind, as opposed to say, a lion whose strength is associated with power and speed. A charging bull takes a while to get up a full head of steam, whereas the lion can go from nought to lightning in the blink of an eye.
The main male god is genrally called the 'Bull of Heaven' or somesuch. This is a reference to the bull's large testicles and the creative pwoer contained therein (they are seed bags).
Both the cow and the bull are symbolic of the planet Earth in that they represent 'plenty' - lots of meat, lots of milk, horn, leather, etc. The cow has a huge udder and the bull has huge testicles.
The Minotaur is aggressive and dangerous because of his human attributes. He basically has the worst of both worlds. His lower half is bovine which connects him to the Earth, his torso is human so he has a human heart (soul) and his head is bovine which gives him the brains of a bull (animal) and no connection to Heaven. He is trapped.
Compare Centaurs who are associated with Wisdom (I don't know why exactly). They have equine lower bodies (strength, grace of movement) and human torso and head (heart and brains). They are tall (they can see far and the head is closer to Heaven) and they are armed with a bow (they can influence things at a distance from themeselves).
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
-
mague
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 2:44 am
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
Nandi, the celestial bull has a bull head and a human body. His body resembles that of Shiva.
Nandi is the mount of Shiva
Nandi is the follower of Shiva
Nandi is the gatekeeper to Shivas abode. The abode is the inner sanctum.
Nandi translates in different indian slangs to "The one blocking the way"
And we dont eat steaks. Thats barbaric
but a different story.
Nandi is the mount of Shiva
Nandi is the follower of Shiva
Nandi is the gatekeeper to Shivas abode. The abode is the inner sanctum.
Nandi translates in different indian slangs to "The one blocking the way"
And we dont eat steaks. Thats barbaric
-
Grey Cloud
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 5:47 am
- Location: NW UK
Re: Cosmology of LaViolette
NOt a million miles away from the Minotaur. The torso containing the heart is human. The Minotaur lives at the centre of the Labyrinth.mague wrote:Nandi, the celestial bull has a bull head and a human body. His body resembles that of Shiva.
Nandi is the mount of Shiva
Nandi is the follower of Shiva
Nandi is the gatekeeper to Shivas abode. The abode is the inner sanctum.
Nandi translates in different indian slangs to "The one blocking the way"
And we dont eat steaks. Thats barbaricbut a different story.
Then there's Laotzu:
If I have the least bit of knowledge
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
I will follow the great Way alone
and fear nothing but being sidetracked.
The great Way is simple
but people delight in complexity.
Tao Te Ching, 53.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests