Gravity Control by EM Field Through Plasma

[Dragoneye]

I did a search on the forum for gravity control and I was informed that gravity was too common of a word. The search function conveniently ignored the word gravity and instead brought up results for the word control with 715 entries. Due to these skewed and excessive results I decided to simply post this.

This paper is in *.pdf and is available from Los Alamos here:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0701091

The title of the paper is Gravity Control by means of Electromagnetic Field through Gas or Plasma at Ultra-Low Pressure

Gravity Control by means of Electromagnetic Field through Gas or Plasma at Ultra-Low Pressure
Authors: Fran De Aquino
(Submitted on 8 Jan 2007 (v1), last revised 2 Mar 2009 (this version, v9))

Abstract: It is shown that the gravity acceleration just above a chamber filled with gas or plasma at ultra-low pressure can be strongly reduced by applying an Extra Low-Frequency (ELF) electromagnetic field across the gas or the plasma. This Gravitational Shielding Effect is related to recent discovery of quantum correlation between gravitational mass and inertial mass. According to the theory samples hung above the gas or the plasma should exhibit a weight decrease when the frequency of the electromagnetic field is decreased or when the intensity of the electromagnetic field is increased. This Gravitational Shielding Effect is unprecedented in the literature and can not be understood in the framework of the General Relativity. From the technical point of view, there are several applications for this discovery; possibly it will change the paradigms of energy generation, transportation and telecommunications.

emphasis added

Grab a fluorescent lamp, a signal generator and get ready to prove it to yourself. Personal antigrav vehicles to follow shortly!

[mharratsc]

Wow! Save that article- you won't see it again after DARPA gets wind of it... >.<

Mike H.

[junglelord]

Electrogravitics raised its head again?
....yes!

But look for it to buried again by the forces that be, very soon.

[StevenO]

Wow! Save that article- you won't see it again after DARPA gets wind of it... >.<

Mike H.

I would'nt start cheering yet. The article uses some formula's that are known to be false and all the results presented are theoretical. Me thinks that he could have presented at least actual measurements for the fluorescent lights setup. The fact that he did'nt do that smells like......rotten fish perhaps?

But, I'll give it a try to see if we can observe some results.

[bboyer]

[barf] ....

[short excerpt from p10; math terms not included, indicated by ellipses]

Note that these forces are real. Remind that, the Mach's principle says that the inertial effects upon a particle are consequence of the gravitational interaction of the particle with the rest of the Universe. Then we can conclude that the inertial forces upon an imaginary spacecraft are also real. Consequently, it can travel in the imaginary space-time using its thrusters.

It was shown that, imaginary particles can have infinite speed in the imaginary space-time. Therefore, this is also the speed upper limit for the spacecraft in the imaginary space-time.

Since the gravitational spacecraft can use its thrusters after to becoming an imaginary body, then if the thrusters product a total thrust ... and the gravitational mass of the spacecraft is reduced from ... down to ..., the acceleration of the spacecraft will be, .... With this acceleration the spacecraft crosses the "visible" Universe (diameter=...) in a time interval ... 5.5 months

Since the inertial effects upon the spacecraft are reduced by ... then, in spite of the effective spacecraft acceleration be ..., the effects for the crew and for the spacecraft will be equivalent a' given by ...

This is the order of magnitude of the acceleration upon of a commercial jet aircraft.

On the other hand, the travel in the imaginary space-time can be very safe, because there won't any material body along the trajectory of the spacecraft.

http://lanl.arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0701091v9 (for the full pdf)

Whoo-eeee. "On the other hand, the travel in the imaginary space-time can be very safe, because there won't any material body along the trajectory of the spacecraft."

That's rich.

Brilliant.

[barf] ... Forces that be, have at it.

[StevenO]

But, I'll give it a try to see if we can observe some results.

I tried with a 9W compact fluorescent bulb and a 0.5mHz source at different field strenghts, but I did'nt notice anything.

[StevenO]

[barf] ....

Whoo-eeee. "On the other hand, the travel in the imaginary space-time can be very safe, because there won't any material body along the trajectory of the spacecraft."

That's rich.

Brilliant.

[barf] ... Forces that be, have at it.

Now, see what you get if you start to mistake math for real physics... We probably can't even blame him. It's the mainstream that sets the trend.

[mharratsc]

[barf] ....

Whoo-eeee. "On the other hand, the travel in the imaginary space-time can be very safe, because there won't any material body along the trajectory of the spacecraft."

That's rich.

Brilliant.

[barf] ... Forces that be, have at it.

The General doesn't want to hear yer whinin', boy! The General wants a spaceship for the Army!! Hup! Hup! Hup! Hup!!



Mike H.