The Human Genome?

[junglelord]

research on Extraterrestrial genes in Human DNA was done by Zecharia Sitchin [excerpted]


Zecharia Sitchin


Humbling was the prevalent adjective used by the scientific teams and the media to describe the principal finding that the human genome contains not the anticipated 100,000 - 140,000 genes (the stretches of DNA that direct the production of amino-acids and proteins) but only some 30,000+ -- little more than double the 13,601 genes of a fruit fly and barely fifty percent more than the roundworms: 19,098. What a comedown from the pinnacle of the genomic Tree of Life!

Moreover, there was hardly any uniqueness to the human genes. They are comparative to not the presumed 95 percent but to almost 99 percent of the chimpanzees, and 70 percent of the mouse. Human genes, with the same functions, were found to be identical to genes of other vertebrates, as well as invertebrates, plants, fungi, even yeast. The findings not only confirmed that there was one source of DNA for all life on Earth, but also enabled the scientists to trace the evolutionary process how more complex organisms evolved, genetically, from simpler ones, adopting at each stage the genes of a lower life form to create a more complex higher life form culminating with Homo sapiens.

The Head-scratching Discovery

It was here, in tracing the vertical evolutionary record contained in the human and the other analyzed genomes, that the scientists ran into an enigma. Thehead-scratching discovery by the public consortium, as Science termed it, was that the human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the required predecessors on the genomic evolutionary tree.

How did Humankind acquire such a bunch of enigmatic genes?

In the evolutionary progression from bacteria to invertebrates (such as the lineages of yeast, worms, flies or mustard weed which have been deciphered) to vertebrates (mice, chimpanzees) and finally modern humans, these 223 genes are completely missing in the invertebrate phase. Therefore, the scientists can explain their presence in the human genome by arather recent (in evolutionary time scales)probable horizontal transfer from bacteria.

In other words: At a relatively recent time as Evolution goes, modern humans acquired an extra 223 genes not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of Life, but horizontally, as a sideways insertion of genetic material from bacterial

An Immense Difference

Now, at first glance it would seem that 223 genes is no big deal. In fact, while every single gene makes a great difference to every individual, 223 genes make an immense difference to a species such as ours.

The human genome is made up of about three billion neucleotides (the letters A-C-G-T which stand for the initials of the four nucleic acids that spell out all life on Earth); of them, just a little more than one percent are grouped into functioning genes (each gene consists of thousands of "letters"). The difference between one individual person and another amounts to about oneletter in a thousand in the DNAalphabet. The difference between Humankind and Chimpanzee is less than one percent as genes go; and one percent of 30,000 genes is 300.

So, 223 genes is more than two thirds of the difference between me, you and a chimpanzee!

An analysis of the functions of these genes through the proteins that they spell out, conducted by the Public Consortium team and published in the journal Nature, shows that they include not only proteins involved in important physiological but also psychiatric functions. Moreover, they are responsible for important neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA the so-called "Eve DNA" that humankind inherited only through the mother-line, all the way back to a singleEve. That finding alone raises doubt regarding that the "bacterial insertion" explanation.

A Matter of Extreme Significance

Unless further scientific research can establish, beyond any doubt, that the only possible source of the extra genes are indeed bacteria, and unless it is then also determined that the infection (horizontal transfer) went from bacteria to Man and not from Man to bacteria, the only other available solution will be that offered by the Sumerian texts millennia ago.

Until then, the enigmatic 223 alien genes will remain as an alternative and as a corroboration by modern science of extraterrestrial civilizations, and their apparent genetic participation in the Human Genome.

A Shaky Theory

How sure are the scientists that such important and complex genes, such an immense human advantage, was obtained by us -- rather recently-- through the courtesy of infecting bacteria?

It is a jump that does not follow current evolutionary theories, said Steven Scherer, director of mapping of the Human Genome Sequencing Centre, Baylor College of Medicine.

We did not identify a strongly preferred bacterial source for the putative horizontally transferred genes, states the report in Nature. The Public Consortium team, conducting a detailed search, found that some 113 genes (out of the 223)are widespread among bacteria though they are entirely absent even in invertebrates. An analysis of the proteins which the enigmatic genes express showed that out of 35 identified, only ten had counterparts in vertebrates (ranging from cows to rodents to fish); 25 of the 35 were unique to humans.

It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from human to bacteria, Science quoted Robert Waterson, co-director of Washington University's Genome Sequencing Center, as saying.

But if Man gave those genes to bacteria, where did Man acquire those genes to begin with? Zecharia Sitchin concludes that Human Genome was manipulated by Extraterrestrials.

Reference: Original report documented by the Public Consortium is in Nature, Feb 15, 2001 and of Celera Genomics in Science of Feb 16th, 2001.

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 01340.html

[Tone]

.
Hi Junglelord, thank you for this information! I liked this info from the following link:
http://www.netscientia.com/sumerians.html

Most all of the ancient languages have now been deciphered, and the 22 Hebrew letters have been found to contain information based on light generating systems. Our understanding of torodial force fields, fibonacci series, fractals and open topological vector spaces have been expressed in the language of mathematics.

Star fields begin to look more like computer generated printouts than random points of light in the night sky.
If there is one thing Sitchin has definitely accomplished, it has been to expand the human imagination.

The legendary cultures of Atlantis and Lemuria no longer appear fantastic, but as efforts of other races to survive on planet Earth.

The SETI project, the government's official Search for "Extraterrestrial Intelligence" has been cancelled, and then reactivated by a private consortium of companies. The most recent Mars probe completely disappeared (Doh!). The answer given to these enigmas are unsatisfactory, when weighted against the evidence that another race of people is about to visit our planet, as they apparently have many times in the past. Remember, it takes Earth one year to orbit the sun. It takes Nibiru 3,600 years, according to Sitchin. Therefore, one year for the Nibiruans is equal to 3,600 Earth years.

He has completed all this research, he says, to prepare us, the human race, for the return of our creators.

I have only seen one informational video about the Human Genom Project:

VOYAGE OF DISCOVERY - THE HUMAN GENOM PROJECT...
Video: How Big is Your Genome? Strange DNA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr428fhp64I
The video, is around 9 minutes long, with Chrystal

I wrote down some facts she tells, that I found interesting:

"250 UNIQUE Human Genes are NOT found in ANY lower species..

Scientists have not been able to find any evolutionary basis for these genes...

*
What about our blood, bloodline and our heredity then...
for centuries we have THOUGHT that there is something we can call BLOOD-LINES..
MIXED BLOOD... ROYAL BLOOD.. etc etc -

but actually your blood is the only thing that does NOT carry DNA...
NOT passed along!!
It doesnt carry DNA becuase it is the ONLY CELL in your body that doesnt have a Nucleoid..


Surprisingly enough - genetically speaking - ALL RASES ARE EQUAL..

As a matter of fact, if you took a random example of someones DNA,
just by looking at it, you COULD NOT TELL if they where african-american,
caucasian, asian or ANY OTHER rase..

113 genes in our body are from Bacteria!!

*

The Human Genom project has cost 3 BILLION dollars = $3.000 000 000 since the beginning in 1990.

If you look back to as recently as 1980's,
you see that there is a rush to find a SINGLE GENE
that would explain schizofrenia, intelligence, violence, obesity and homosexuality -
BUT since then NO SINGLE GENE has been found.

We now call these carasteristics MULTIFACTORIAL,
which means that its a COMPLEX interaction of genes that are also affected by the environment.

*

Many people think that ADHD is a multifactorial disease,
however scientista have never been able to find a combination of genes
with an environmental factor that accounts for ADHD... "
.

[bboyer]

.
The video, is around 9 minutes long, with Chrystal

I wrote down some facts she tells, that I found interesting:

What about our blood, bloodline and our heredity then...
for centuries we have THOUGHT that there is something we can call BLOOD-LINES..
MIXED BLOOD... ROYAL BLOOD.. etc etc -

but actually your blood is the only thing that does NOT carry DNA...
NOT passed along!!
It doesnt carry DNA becuase it is the ONLY CELL in your body that doesnt have a Nucleoid..

Red blood cells (rbc) do not = blood. Mature rbc's are not nucleated, immature ones are. Nucleated rbc's, including non-nuclear, cellular mitochondrial dna are common in infants. In adults, it appears that any presence of circulating nucleated rbc's is more indicative of, or associated with, pathology of various sorts.

However, blood itself is a common source for dna extraction, from the white blood cells. Crime labs do it all the time now.

[soapbox]As far as pop-writer, mass marketing, Sitchin and his bag of goodies go, along with the rest of the fanciful e.t. sf imaginings... phooey. Outgrew those long ago as mostly irrelevant, fluff entertainment. Good ol' down-to-earth, plain, unadorned everyday life is just so much more fulfilling; not to mention exciting and wondrous. Just sayin'. Or spoutin' off. Aliens and other "important" global conspiracies. Bah-humbug. Who needs 'em (rhetorical, no need to answer ). [/soapbox]

[Tone]

Aliens and other "important" global conspiracies. Bah-humbug. Who needs 'em (rhetorical, no need to answer ). [/soapbox]

(I hope you get the 'tone')

Oh you are SO mature hehe. Well last I checked my eyes there was nothin wrong so I trust what Ive seen so far reg 'non'-terrans
Guess Im still 'young at heart'? *teas*

As for Sitchin, its a bit unfair that one person only can interpret such an important past (coding)
I would suggest that my fellow's start investigating the conspiracy behind HIS background,
HIS connections and dig up some juicy consTRUCTIVE-spiracies

As for blood.. and the 'facts' they present - can we really trust the scientists?
They are 'approved' by higher authorities, also depending on nationality (!)
-isms directing systems put into place to keep certain knowledge out of the know.
(Cant wait to see next episode of the soap-reality 'Official Files' act 2)

ID LOVE to discuss more about 'conspiracies' since Ive battled debunkers til they wade around my knees,
but I just painted my claws, so that have to wait awhile *mischevious grin with sugar on top*

Adding: I would wanna find the HumanE genome!

.

[Grey Cloud]

Hi folks,
I trust neither Sitchin or the scientists. Sitchin has written an awful lot of books based on a handful of fragmentary clay tablets that even real experts don't really understand (they are in the wrong state of consciousness for a kick-off). As for scientists and DNA, I'm old enough to remember headline after headline of the cure for this or that disease being just around the corner based on their knowledge of DNA. I wouldn't trust any 'expert', whether independent or conspiracy affiliated, to meddle with any DNA never mind the human genome.

My conspiracy theory tops all others.

[junglelord]

I don't trust anyone. There is so much disinformation out there, deliberately placed mind you, and that is the real conspiracy.

[Grey Cloud]

I don't trust anyone. There is so much disinformation out there, deliberately placed mind you, and that is the real conspiracy.

But who is doing the deliberating?

[junglelord]

We know for a fact that the CIA, NSA, and other agencies have disinformation programs to protect miltary intelligence.

[Grey Cloud]

We know for a fact that the CIA, NSA, and other agencies have disinformation programs to protect miltary intelligence.

My conspiracy theory accomodates all of those.

[Tone]

.

My conspiracy theory tops all others.

Now, you know its not nice to leave a 'cliffhanger' like that?!
I hope you reveile WHO killed Disco?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwakjoSs754
(VERY classefied file I smuggled out from Finland, the dude in white is my boyfriend under mindcontrol..
wait til the 'crescendo' after 2 min....... scary, luckaly I saved him from that cult)
redruM... redruM... ('the shining') on the dancefloor, but u betta not kill the blues!


I look forward to read about ASCIO in your post / book / film?!
Advanced Contact Intelligence Organization
http://educate-yourself.org/cn/studycit ... un03.shtml

.

[Grey Cloud]

My conspiracy theory accomodates bad disco dancing, cults and ASCIO. It also ensures that the blues are immortal.
P.S. I'm glad you put crescendo in inverted commas.

[bboyer]

Hi folks,
<snip>I wouldn't trust any 'expert', whether independent or conspiracy affiliated, to meddle with any DNA never mind the human genome.

August 18, 2009
DNA Evidence Can Be Fabricated, Scientists Show
By ANDREW POLLACK

Scientists in Israel have demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate DNA evidence, undermining the credibility of what has been considered the gold standard of proof in criminal cases.

The scientists fabricated blood and saliva samples containing DNA from a person other than the donor of the blood and saliva. They also showed that if they had access to a DNA profile in a database, they could construct a sample of DNA to match that profile without obtaining any tissue from that person.

“You can just engineer a crime scene,” said Dan Frumkin, lead author of the paper, which has been published online by the journal Forensic Science International: Genetics. “Any biology undergraduate could perform this.”

Dr. Frumkin is a founder of Nucleix, a company based in Tel Aviv that has developed a test to distinguish real DNA samples from fake ones that it hopes to sell to forensics laboratories.

The planting of fabricated DNA evidence at a crime scene is only one implication of the findings. A potential invasion of personal privacy is another.

Using some of the same techniques, it may be possible to scavenge anyone’s DNA from a discarded drinking cup or cigarette butt and turn it into a saliva sample that could be submitted to a genetic testing company that measures ancestry or the risk of getting various diseases. Celebrities might have to fear “genetic paparazzi,” said Gail H. Javitt of the Genetics and Public Policy Center at Johns Hopkins University.

Tania Simoncelli, science adviser to the American Civil Liberties Union, said the findings were worrisome.

“DNA is a lot easier to plant at a crime scene than fingerprints,” she said. “We’re creating a criminal justice system that is increasingly relying on this technology.”

John M. Butler, leader of the human identity testing project at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, said he was “impressed at how well they were able to fabricate the fake DNA profiles.” However, he added, “I think your average criminal wouldn’t be able to do something like that.”

The scientists fabricated DNA samples two ways. One required a real, if tiny, DNA sample, perhaps from a strand of hair or drinking cup. They amplified the tiny sample into a large quantity of DNA using a standard technique called whole genome amplification.

Of course, a drinking cup or piece of hair might itself be left at a crime scene to frame someone, but blood or saliva may be more believable.

The authors of the paper took blood from a woman and centrifuged it to remove the white cells, which contain DNA. To the remaining red cells they added DNA that had been amplified from a man’s hair.

Since red cells do not contain DNA, all of the genetic material in the blood sample was from the man. The authors sent it to a leading American forensics laboratory, which analyzed it as if it were a normal sample of a man’s blood.

The other technique relied on DNA profiles, stored in law enforcement databases as a series of numbers and letters corresponding to variations at 13 spots in a person’s genome.

From a pooled sample of many people’s DNA, the scientists cloned tiny DNA snippets representing the common variants at each spot, creating a library of such snippets. To prepare a DNA sample matching any profile, they just mixed the proper snippets together. They said that a library of 425 different DNA snippets would be enough to cover every conceivable profile.

Nucleix’s test to tell if a sample has been fabricated relies on the fact that amplified DNA — which would be used in either deception — is not methylated, meaning it lacks certain molecules that are attached to the DNA at specific points, usually to inactivate genes.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/18/scien ... .html?_r=1

[junglelord]

A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project indicate that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of extraterrestrial life forms.

The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on Earth, from moulds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the group leader. Non-coding sequences, originally known as "junk DNA", were discovered years ago, and their function remained a mystery. The overwhelming majority of Human DNA is "Off-world" in origin. The apparent "extraterrestrial junk genes" merely "enjoy the ride" with hard working active genes, passed from generation to generation.

After comprehensive analysis with the assistance of other scientists, computer programmers, mathematicians, and other learned scholars, Professor Chang had wondered if the apparently "junk Human DNA" was created by some kind of "extraterrestrial programmer". The alien chunks within Human DNA, Professor Chang further observes, "have its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs."

Professor Chang further stipulates that "Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various planets. Earth is just one of them. Perhaps, after programming, our creators grow us the same way we grow bacteria in Petri dishes. We can't know their motives - whether it was a scientific experiment, or a way of preparing new planets for colonization, or is it long time ongoing business of seedling life in the universe."

Professor Chang further indicates that "If we think about it in our human terms, the apparent "extraterrestrial programmers" were most probably working on "one big code" consisting of several projects, and the projects should have produced various life forms for various planets. They have been also trying various solutions. They wrote "the big code", executed it, did not like some function, changed them or added new one, executed again, made more improvements, tried again and again."

Professor Chang's team of researchers furthermore concludes that, "The apparent "extraterrestrial programmers" may have been ordered to cut all their idealistic plans for the future when they concentrated on the "Earth project" to meet the pressing deadline. Very likely in an apparent rush, the "extraterrestrial programmers" may have cut down drastically on big code and delivered basic program intended for Earth."

Professor Chang is only one of many scientists and other researchers who have discovered extraterrestrial origins to Humanity.

Professor Chang and his research colleagues show that apparent "extraterrestrial programming" gaps in DNA sequencing precipitated by a hypothesized rush to create human life on Earth presented humankind with illogical growth of mass of cells we know as cancer."

Professor Chang further indicates that "What we see in our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and basic code." Mr. Chang then affirms that the "First fact is, the complete 'program' was positively not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain evolution; there must be something more in 'the game'."

"Soon or later", Professor Chang says "we have to come to grips with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is not what we think it is."

Human Genome Project Discovery Implications associated with "Human-looking Extraterrestrials"

The implications of these scientific finds would reinforce claims by other scientists and observers of having contact with 'off-world' human looking extraterrestrials.

The 'off-world' human looking extraterrestrial have been claimed to have provided some of the genetic material for human evolution, and that many of these extraterrestrials have allowed some of their personnel to incarnate as 'star seeds' on Earth in human families. These "star seeds", "star children" or "star people" are described by Brad and Francie Steiger as individuals whose 'souls' were formally incarnated on the worlds of other star systems and then traveled to Earth and decided to incarnate here in order to "boost" the spiritual evolutionary development of humanity. Most of humanity would consider this group of extraterrestrials to be 'benevolent' as described by 'contactees' such as George Adamski, Orfeo Angelucci, George Van Tassell, Howard Menger, Paul Villa, Billy Meier and Alex Collier who each explain the nature of their voluntary interactions with these human looking extraterrestrials. These "contactees" often provide physical evidence in the form of photographs, film and/or witnesses of their contacts with extraterrestrial races. The most extensively documented and researched contactee is Eduard 'Billy' Meier who provided much physical evidence for investigators.

Representations concerning 'Ancient astronauts'

Indeed, 'ancient astronaut' writers believe that a race of intelligent extraterrestrial beings visited and/or colonised Earth in the remote past, whereupon they upgraded the primitive hominid Homo erectus by means of genetic engineering to create the human race as we know it: Homo sapiens.

Evidence for this idea is found (a) in the improbability of Homo sapiens emerging so suddenly, according to the principles of orthodox Darwinism; and (b) in the myths of ancient civilisations which describe human-like gods coming down from the heavens and creating mankind 'in their own image'.Homo sapiens is thus regarded as a hybrid being, incorporating a mix of terrestrial genes from Homo erectus and extraterrestrial genes from an ascribed "race of the gods".

Prior to the modern age of space travel and genetics, this theory for the origins of humankind could not have been conceived. And even now, in the 21st century, there are many people who would regard it as science fiction. However, in the light of the problems with the orthodox theory of human evolution, the idea of a genetic intervention by an intelligent human-like species (who themselves evolved on another planet over a more credible time frame) does require to be taken seriously as a potential solution to the mystery.

The most famous exponents of the ancient astronaut intervention are the Swiss writer Erich von Daniken and the American writer Zecharia Sitchin. The latter, in particular, has argued the case in great detail.

Representation by academics from "Exopolitics" groups

Dr. Micheal E. Salla is one of the founders of an Exopolitics movement which seeks an open and informed dialogue on, and with, Extraterrestrials, toward the affirmation of "global democracy" and the quality-of-living of humankind as socially responsible beings in the Universe. Dr. Salla indicates that "There are an extensive number of extraterrestrial races known [by various research institutions and agencies] to be currently interacting with Earth and the human population.

Dr. Salla, is also the author of Exopolitics: Political Implications of the Extraterrestrial Presence (Dandelion Books, 2004). He has held full time academic appointments at the Australian National University, and American University, Washington DC. He has a Ph.D. in Government from the University of Queensland, Australia. During his professional academic career, he was best known for organizing a series of citizen diplomacy initiatives for the East Timor conflict funded by U.S. Institute of Peace and the Ford Foundation. He is also the Founder of the Exopolitics Institute ; and Chief Editor of the 'Exopolitics Journal' and Convener of the "Extraterrestrial Civilizations and World Peace Conference."

In a 1998 interview, Clifford Stone, a retired U.S. army Sergeant who served in the U.S. Army for 22 years and allegedly participated in operations to retrieve crashed extraterrestrial ships and extraterrestrial biological entities (EBE's), revealed there were a variety of extraterrestrial races known [by various institutions and agencies]". Dr. Salla further elaborates that "The most compelling testimonies on the different extraterrestrial races comes from 'whistleblowers' such as Sergeant Stone; and also 'contactees' who have had direct physical contact with extraterrestrials and communicated with them."

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/F ... 01288.html

[StevenO]

Everybody is entitled to his own pet theories, like owning a real pet. A friend of mine holds that bacteria are higher lifeforms than humans and I can find no fault in his reasoning. The evidence is mounting :

Flat Bacteria in Nanoslits

It appears that bacteria can squeeze through practically anything. In extremely small nanoslits they take on a completely new flat shape. Even in this squashed form they continue to grow and divide at normal speeds. This has been demonstrated by research carried out at TU Delft's Kavli Institute of Nanoscience. The results will be appearing this week in the online edition of the prestigious scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) and as the cover article in the September 1 print issue of PNAS.

By manipulating oxygen, scientists coax bacteria into a wave

Bacteria know that they are too small to make an impact individually. So they wait, they multiply, and then they engage in behaviors that are only successful when all cells participate in unison. There are hundreds of behaviors that bacteria carry out in such communities. Now researchers at Rockefeller University have discovered one that has never been observed or described before in a living system. The bacteria accumulate and form a solitary propagating wave that moves with constant velocity and without changing shape. But while the front is moving, each bacterium in it isn’t moving at all.

“It’s like a soliton,” says Douarche. “A self-reinforcing solitary wave.”

Ever seen humans make solitons?

Microbial Intelligence
Intelligent bacteria?
Bacterial Intelligence

[moses]

They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of extraterrestrial life forms.
junglelord

Much of the "extraterrestial" DNA could have been produced on Mars.
Thus there were human-like creatures on Mars which came to Earth
to produce our humanity. Thus no genetic engineering required. Not
that I am against an extra-solar origin. Just a consideration.
Mo