Infra-red from atomic elements.

[kodybatill]

Is there anyone who can explain why small enough pieces of carbon would be changed creating a unique isotope of carbon, upon contact to infra-red rays? This is what occurs when using graphite oxide on a dvd to be burnt by a dvd burner and it's strong infra-red rays. The carbon in the graphite oxide changes and is caused to bond together in 6 pointed honey comb type lattices. 2d as possible makes it the most super-conductive, even at room tempuratures - Graphene........ And believe that each point of the 6 pointed lattice represents a unique direction and form of carbon, and counting one up and down or diagonally may equate to one to - which is why we get such good supercoductance with this material, because as I have found in my research, 7+1 types of carbon cause electron neutrinos to not break apart - and then applying pure silicon and silicon isotope, causes resonance or phase conjugance - speaking or singing, ringing.

I tried the dvd burner way of making graphene, but it did not work. The dvd burner I bought would not read the disk. So I thought of another way! Infra-red rays could be produced by leaving sulfur water with calcium in the sun to dehydrate, and maybe do it a few times - the oxygen in the water and the calcium itself together create infra-red reactions when in contact with sulfur. Being left out in the sun and stars many times to dehydrate, could cause strong enough infra-sound and infra-red rays to change or mutate the type of carbons that could be put into this liquid while being left in the sun. Burnt wood ash, graphite, and graphite oxide, and even maybe calcium carbonate can be used in smallest sizes, to be able to be effected by the infra-red from oxygen, calcium (which is related to deuterium), and sulfur. And I pose another question - could maybe elements related with sulfur, calcium, and oxygen create what people call red-shift in space? The electrical implications of this is that the oxygen is particles acting like rays, the sulfur is particles acting like rays, and the calcium is rays acting like a particle. Each of these have a mathematical formula related with them, where oxygen is the multiplication of positrons, and sulfur and calcium are post-isotopic states of the destructive line of water, or when (in isotopic state) - when the neutron/circumference, of two or more things moving slow enough to break down at the destructive line of water, replaced by the proton/volume of moving them into something similar, causing it to move slow enough to break apart at the destructive line of water. These have all previous elements, within them. The formula of the destructive line of water is best described in a more controlled environment. But all of this is only visible because the diameter, or electron was not left out. The diameter or electron is like aluminum, and has to be touched for any electrical energy to occur at all - maybe also part of it's position as one of the main and most effective methods of creating glass mirrors. I say this because Aluminum, like yitrium, are when rays act like particles, and part of the example is that when you take one particle of inert gas element heavier than xenon from yitrium, it turns into that aluminum, similar to how silicon has been distilled from the air and into water by IBM in the past - and I bet that in the yitrium turning into aluminum, it follows the path of rays acting like particles....... Both of those elements are good at making reflective glass mirrors, some of the most reflective. Could all of this be a reason to look for actual Universal electric poles unique within each element, but still capable of changing movements and elements above us in the stars? Of course these electrical poles would also exist in space, but also unique within each similar physical atom.

[webolife]

There's a lot of issues to digest. But let me add another: Dr. Gerald Pollock's research has revealed that water ice produces an infra-red signal at the moment of crystallization.

Maybe it's not the graphene restructuring that results from infra-red, rather the reverse?

Here is a series of claims I will set forth for your consideration: I will introduce some terms with parentheses, then attempt to clarify the parenthetics with following remarks. Let me know what you think.

Light [not only infra-red] is "produced" at any point of transition to a lower energy state [at the molecular/atomic level]. I put the quotation marks around that word because in my outlook, light is itself the action of condensation or discharge at the interface of the atomic or molecular field boundary or "surface". This time the quotations are because it is incongruent to define a surface at the nano-level.

What we have are field boundary conditions, which are electrically "charged". Quotes again because charge lacks a consistent definition from theory to theory.

What we know is that electrons [whatever they are] accumulate toward a system centroid [call it a nucleus] yet "repel" each other, and we refer to these as opposite charge actions. This time the quotes are due to the phenomenon of "Like likes like" [Feynman, Langmuir, et.al.], a recognition of the observation that between like charged objects exists a zone of opposite orientation that mediates the accumulation of the like-charged objects.

A generalization [probably oversimplification] of this observation might be that in nature there is an overall inward pressure or "Centropy".

Now back to infra-red: In any dynamic system this centropic tendency leads to a net entropic reduction in energy level [decay], a small amount of which we "detect" as infra-red, larger amounts being detected in increasing degrees of light, the color spectrum all the way up to x- and gamma-radiation.

Now for my particular brand of weirdness: We detect this field pressure collapse by virtue of our being a part of [connected to] the collapsing field; so the same vector that operates at the field centroid is also operating at my retina [or infra-red-sensitive device, or...] and voila, let there be light. Folks object to this "instantaneous action at a distance", but hey, at what level of existence in the universe are objects not separated from each other by some distance?

[kevin]

webolife,
Wonderfull reply.
IMHO,
light occurs, the so called speed of light been the local difference in competing fields (Sun/earth)(moon/earth)
Kevin

[kodybatill]

All very interesting and most to agree with. BUT graphene is a result of infra-red forces, I am certain - or at least it can be. I do believe that infra-red will be generated by water under certain conditions. Hydrogen contains every element of the Universe, within it. There is a formula for what other elements also exist within a single atom of a certain element. It is multiples of how many protons and electrons an element has - hydrogen has only 1 proton, and so is a multiple of all elements. It is contained by multiples of 4, which the proton itself represents, which would include what I believe to be 8, or nitrogen type elements, making the hydrogen spectra partially pink. These are all placed along the bands in a double rainbow, which is truly held together in space by energetic complexes, and not just water itself. If infra-red can come from hydrogen, it would be at multiple 12, and multiples of that on-ward into the future. That would be the equivalent of the red on the second outer band of a double rainbow - and may be able to be studied to observe other parts of infra-red itself, or even red-shift I believe.

[webolife]

All very interesting and most to agree with. BUT graphene is a result of infra-red forces, I am certain - or at least it can be. I do believe that infra-red will be generated by water under certain conditions. Hydrogen contains every element of the Universe, within it. There is a formula for what other elements also exist within a single atom of a certain element. It is multiples of how many protons and electrons an element has - hydrogen has only 1 proton, and so is a multiple of all elements.

Oops... you meant to say factor here rather than multiple. Not sure if this is an English as second language issue or you just have forgotten your elementary math...

It is contained by multiples of 4, which the proton itself represents, which would include what I believe to be 8, or nitrogen type elements, making the hydrogen spectra partially pink. These are all placed along the bands in a double rainbow, which is truly held together in space by energetic complexes, and not just water itself. If infra-red can come from hydrogen, it would be at multiple 12, and multiples of that on-ward into the future. That would be the equivalent of the red on the second outer band of a double rainbow - and may be able to be studied to observe other parts of infra-red itself, or even red-shift I believe.

Actually, the rainbow exists in the eye of the beholder, not out there in the sky. It is entirely the result of the geometry of water reflection/refraction from multitudes of prismic water droplets or ice crystals, whose combined reflections join as a rainbow only at the receptive interface, your retina.

[kodybatill]

You yourself seem to have made some elementary mistakes! Which makes your words seem practically occult. Sorry it worked out that way.

My use of the word multiple is correct, as it means any amount of a particular number, used how-ever many times, even when considering factors since factors can also be multiplied. Unless you would like to make another mistake of Universal Priestly Self regard - and say it cant be done. That is essentially what we are looking at here friend.

And again you are wrong, this time about the rainbow. If it were in the eye of the beholder, then there would be no color to the rainbow, as all colors are energy spectra emitted by different elements, even when through a prism - the mechanism in the prism and else-where, in oils and space, has not been reached by the public scientific front. In reality, rainbows may exist because of huge piezo-electric and piezo-magnetic effects from crystals in the Earth - and then made persistent through silicon, magnesium, inert gases, and calcium type elements in all space - through light and sound - using unique forms of plasma.

Again I was trying to have a friendly conversation here, but you bush-wacked me - weboflife -
with your Universal Priestly Self Regard. How would you know that I am not already putting up with enough of that back at home? Your actions through people you end up meeting in the future could mean hurting someone's life friend - I would be a little more happy that you even have anyone to talk to on here. You know?

[webolife]

The priestly self regard detractions are entirely unnecessary.
I am saying nothing occult here.

*Check your math: "1" is indeed a factor of every number, but a multiple only of itself.

**Check your optics... while a rainbow is setup by the reflections and refractions of multitudes of droplets or crystals that can be various distances from you, the gradient of angles by which we detect the "colors" are a result of the lensing and focusing of your own eye, and the retina receives and transmits these to your brain, which then interprets the electrochemical signals as colors. A slit or pinhole device also serves to focus and arrange the color array, so this angular gradient of color may be elicited by the same principle. It is this "theta"-angle gradient which gave rise to the concept of color "wavelengths", a conclusion I happen to disagree with.

Now it is true that colors are also varied by the particular electronic energy configuration of elements [eg. dyes], but the transmission of color across space is completely transparent, ie. invisible, until it is resonantly received by a detector. Thus, our retina is attuned to the colors of the rainbow, and a very small amount of infrared; while a pair of night goggles resonates to IR, fly's eyes are attuned to some UV, snakes to infrared, an antenna to radio, x-ray film or digital CT technologies... etc.

You may have some interesting points to make, but if you wish to communicate them harmoniously, make sure your word usage or misusage doesn't get in the way. Not everyone agrees with me around here, but I try to engage respectfully with whomever I dialogue, and most folks here try to do the same with me.

As for "occult" [which means hidden], it is true that I propose some concepts that disagree with mainstream in several respects, eg. "action at a distance" is as weird today as it was when Kepler first dialogued about it with Galileo; but I try to back up everything I say with actual observation, so the "occult" comment is probably out of place.

[Maol]

I hope you guys don't get high-centered on what I think is an inversion of mathematical semantics.

Shamelessly pilfed from Wikipedia: --> In mathematics a divisor of an integer n, also called a factor of n, is an integer that can be multiplied by some other integer to produce n. An integer n is divisible by another integer m if m is a factor of n, so that dividing n by m leaves no remainder.

It would seem in discussion like this the word "multiple" can be used as "factor" when it refers to a round number or whole number divisor.

[webolife]

Not sure exactly what you're thinking Maol, but your quoted definition simply means that a multiple of one number can be a factor of another... also every number is both a factor of and a multiple of itself by virtue of the number "1". But that is not the issue with Kodybatill's statement, where he simply used the word "multiple" when meaning to use the word "factor".

hydrogen has only 1 proton, and so is a multiple of all elements.

No, factor.

[upriver]

I found this paper to be especially enlightening because of its great graphics..

Extraordinary momentum and spin in evanescent waves
Momentum and spin represent fundamental dynamical properties of quantum particles and fields. In particular, propagating optical waves (photons) carry momentum and longitudinal spin determined by the wave vector and circular polarization, respectively. Here we show that exactly the opposite can be the case for evanescent optical waves. A single evanescent wave possesses a spin component, which is independent of the polarization and is orthogonal to the wave vector.
Furthermore, such a wave carries a momentum component, which is determined by the circular polarization and is also orthogonal to the wave vector. We show that these extraordinary properties reveal a fundamental Belinfante’s spin momentum, known in field theory and unobservable in propagating fields. We demonstrate that the transverse momentum and spin push and twist a probe Mie particle in an evanescent field. This allows the observation of ‘impossible’ properties of light and of a fundamental field-theory quantity, which was previously considered as ‘virtual’.
https://inspirehep.net/record/1246177/f ... 8.0547.pdf

Force and torque on an electric dipole by spinning light fields
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.2050v2.pdf

[webolife]

I liked those papers, upriver, particular in their repeated reference to light as a force field.
Some reflections from my own optical theory of light:
1. Momentum is measured by a change in particles in contact with light, not directly of light "photons".
2. Angular momentum, [or also torque] is as well a particulate behavior resulting from translational motion encountering centropic pressure, which applies to all particles/objects in space, therefore all particles in contact with light, but not necessarily light itself, hence the atomic level restructuring causing infra-red mentioned in the OP.
3. Impulse, the mathematic equivalent of momentum, can be directly applied to the action of light as a force, ie. pressure field. Impulse is force via time, while pressure is force via area, so impulse and pressure are two sides of the space/time virtue, ie. both represent a force acting finitely or discretely, the force of light.
4. This discrete light action, at its fundamental level, could be called a "photon" but the corpuscular implication of that word leads me to avoid it or always use it in quotes. In addition, the spectral refractivity of a single photon [as through a slit device] infers it does not exist as an indivisible or elementary particle.
5. The spectrum is an angular phenomenon, which I take to be a pressure field gradient with respect to the central line of sight, thus blue is closest to the CLoS, red furthest. This is of course reversed in the case of reflected light, nevertheless as we see in atmospheric [primary] rainbows the natural order puts blue in the position closest to the direct sunrays and red opposite. In the case of supernumeraries, the order remains the same, thus violet appears at the junction of the spectral orders as a combination of the red end and the adjacent beginning blue.
6. This natural occurrence of violet at supernumerary junctures obfuscates the standard electromagnetic spectrum model, and EM wave theory in general.
7. So the detection of radio, infrared, ultra violet, x/gamma ray as well as colors may be a resonant frequency mechanism based not on waves but on relative positioning of the pressure gradient with respect to the configuration of spinning receptor interface electrons.

[upriver]

I liked those papers, upriver, particular in their repeated reference to light as a force field.
Some reflections from my own optical theory of light:
1. Momentum is measured by a change in particles in contact with light, not directly of light "photons".

Yep. Light or Kinetic energy only shows itself in interactions with massive matter. Momentum is the math of kinetic energy with a vector to indicate direction. Speed without the vector could be expressed in Joules.

2. Angular momentum, [or also torque] is as well a particulate behavior resulting from translational motion encountering centropic pressure, which applies to all particles/objects in space, therefore all particles in contact with light, but not necessarily light itself, hence the atomic level restructuring causing infra-red mentioned in the OP.

"As the wave propagates along the z -axis, the fields rotate in the transverse ( x, y) plane. This rotation generates the spin AM density s ∝σ z , which is represented in (b) by multiple loops of the (zero-net) spin-momentum pS = ∇ × s / 2 in the transverse plane. At the same time, the wave propagation produces the canonical (orbital) momentum density pO ∝ k  z . (c) Orbital momentum and spin AM are locally transferred to a probe particle, thereby exerting a radiation force F ∝ pO and torque T ∝ s on it, Eqs. (6)"

The evanescent wave transfers kinetic energy to the particle causing spin or translation of the particle.

3. Impulse, the mathematic equivalent of momentum, can be directly applied to the action of light as a force, ie. pressure field. Impulse is force via time, while pressure is force via area, so impulse and pressure are two sides of the space/time virtue, ie. both represent a force acting finitely or discretely, the force of light.

Sure its the force of light but I like to think of it as work done by kinetic energy...

4. This discrete light action, at its fundamental level, could be called a "photon" but the corpuscular implication of that word leads me to avoid it or always use it in quotes. In addition, the spectral refractivity of a single photon [as through a slit device] infers it does not exist as an indivisible or elementary particle.

I would have to agree with you there. Who knows how far the wave function of the photon is spread out below the Quantization point especially if a Bohm like pilot wave theory is correct. I think of a photon like a high amplitude pulse above the noise.

5. The spectrum is an angular phenomenon, which I take to be a pressure field gradient with respect to the central line of sight, thus blue is closest to the CLoS, red furthest. This is of course reversed in the case of reflected light, nevertheless as we see in atmospheric [primary] rainbows the natural order puts blue in the position closest to the direct sunrays and red opposite. In the case of supernumeraries, the order remains the same, thus violet appears at the junction of the spectral orders as a combination of the red end and the adjacent beginning blue.

6. This natural occurrence of violet at supernumerary junctures obfuscates the standard electromagnetic spectrum model, and EM wave theory in general.
7. So the detection of radio, infrared, ultra violet, x/gamma ray as well as colors may be a resonant frequency mechanism based not on waves but on relative positioning of the pressure gradient with respect to the configuration of spinning receptor interface electrons.

Typically pressure means some kind of longitudinal wave in a medium. In order to have a beam of pressure you need to have a particulate or flexible substrate in order to transmit a pulse of energy or do work.

[webolife]

"Beam" is an interesting word choice. A beam is fundamentally a ray acting upon a finite surface [area].
How do you get a beam from a wave? Likewise how do you get an image from a wave front? Yet any explanation of optics resorts to the a ray diagram. I conclude light action is a ray, ie. finite vector ["beam"] of pressure. No model employing wave fronts can do the job. And the direction of rays TOWARD the light source as a sink defies a particulate carrier corpuscle.