North-Negative and South-Positive equivalencies!

[Robbie_G]

I have wondered about this before, It's a great and complete answer... And the kitty in the video looks like mine!

https://youtu.be/1TKSfAkWWN0

So a "north" magnetic field is equivalent to a "negative" electric field. A "south" magnetic field is equivalent to a "positive" electric field. This certainly explains a lot!

Interpreting the field as an electric field or a magnetic field is dependant upon your reference frame of relative motion! If you are moving relative to the charge then it's a magnetic field. If you are moving with the charge then it's an electric field!....why didn't you know that?

~Robert

[Chickenmales]

Dude, you're losing your mind. Assuming that people didn't know that is a big assumption, and there's no way you could possibly know that.

There are a lot of holes in SR, one of them, which applies directly to the video you posted is that velocities are realative. This means that according to SR (which is wrong) two observers will observe the other to have contracted in length, i.e. they won't agree that only the "moving" observer has contracted.

For some reason (conspiracy) whenever someone makes a video explaining this stuff, the Earth always has zero velocity in all reference frames, which makes it not only the center of the universe, but the center of all space-time as well.

[toni]

My understanding is that nature doesn't work with the south and north or positive and negative.
Nature is divided in the red and blue spectrum - red equals male and blue equals female. Whatever we see it is the dance of 2 lights which work in unison to create matter.
Every wave has 2 fields: compression and expansion or generoactive and radioactive. One is winding matter into existence and the other simultaneously unwinding into space. When we say negatively charged particles, it would be the same as saying silent sound. We could put any name as long as we know the proper workings of the system.

Toni

[Elder]

Hi toni, I think you are working from ´Walter Russel´s cosmology, which I find very interesting and definitely worthy of thought and examination. However, in the 21st. century anything that cannot be determined by mathematics or laboratory experiments is termed ´pseudoscience´, and is rarely looked at anymore. Walter Russel´s cosmology is a little bit the same, although it has some very effective ideas. The idea of replacing male and female for positive and negative charges in the real world, is worthy of consideration, but by doing so, you are taking ´electricity´ and ´magnetism´ away from something that is measurable in a laboratory. Electricity and magnetism become something that is emotional or spiritual and can no longer be measured in the normal way. I agree that to think of natural forces in this way, could lead to some interesting results, but they would also have to be repeatable and measurable.
Terminology and format is another terrible problem with the communication of mathematics or the sciences. The metric system is a case in point, where some countries , notably the USA, still refuse to use the decimal system properly e.g. using a comma instead of a dot for a decimal place. I think the use of imperial measure is still widely practised there too. Therefore, it is very important to be as clear as possible when trying to describe anything scientific, because there are so many ways to do it. In some ways it would be good to jettison all the old jargon and terminology and use Walter Russel´s descriptions. However, I think it will be a long while before it could be accepted as normal by education and institutes etc.

[toni]

Hi Elder,
You are very right. It is Walter's work. We started first with some of the old Tesla writings and experimented with it and in our search for an explanation, we needed to know how the coils worked exactly. At that point we stumbled upon Walter's work. Now it is very easy for me to say the things that I am writing when I have a proven concept of it. We are not taking electricity away by any means, only explaining the workings of the wave and its 2 fields. One big mistake that we are all making is stating that magnetism is a force by itself rather then being an effect of electricity. A magnet could be created by putting a high voltage through special metals which could remember vortexs that created it. Until we start being open to new ideas and using our critical reasoning, we can't go too far.
If we look into today's electric motor and we see that we are only using one side of the coil, which means 50% waste, how is it possible then that we claim the motor is 96% efficient? What happened to the mathematicans? You are also correct when you say that we are quite far away from the truth.

[Elder]

Hi Toni,
I am not a scientist myself, and I was trained as an architect with art as my hobby. However, the EU really appeals to me as it covers such a wide field of human activity. Walter Russel also started out life as an artist, so his work strikes a cord with me as well. His cosmology combines the old with the new in an interesting way, and I think the scientists of today could learn a lot from him. All the best with your experiments.

[MerLynn]

The North poles are 'stronger' than the South poles.

North Poles 'create' while South 'uncreate'.

For those who can see energy fields the north has more 'fire' than the south and there are actually 8 poles on a magnet.

From another forum.....

To make any Iron Non Rusting (this is a huge secret people) place the blade between two ferrite magnets with the North poles both facing the blade like ham between two slices of bread. To place the South poles both facing the blade will see it rust faster. It does get more involved and for the perfectionist non rusting sword makers out there one needs to align the other poles that the magnets have.
Rotate the square block and note how the compass of the needle is not only attracted and repelled by the two poles but if the magnet is turned over it dips the needle as well so the Magnets have 2 of the 8 poles observed to be aligned and the rest follow suit. (nothing like learning something new each day that you can prove to yourself)

[D_Archer]

but by doing so, you are taking ´electricity´ and ´magnetism´ away from something that is measurable in a laboratory

Not really, if you have blue and red, you have building force and a retarding force, you can see this in electrical experiments as well, red/magnetism destruction/heat, blue/electricity building/cold. (Eric Dollard showed this once.. must be in some Borderlands video).

Light is photons and yes there are 2 flavours, 1 is upside down* to the other, you can call it photon/anti-photon, or indeed blue or red. Photons enter mostly the south pole of the Earth (and thus also mangnets), while Anti-photons enter the north pole of the Earth (and thus also in magnets). In our solar neighbourhood the 2 fields are not matched, there are more photons than anti-photons.

Regards,
Daniel

*photons are real (small) particles, they have extension in 3D, thus radius and the also spin, a photon can spin clockwise when you look at it from above, counterclockwise when it is upside down... that is the photon field, also know as charge field as per Miles Mathis.