SubQuantum Physics

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Wed May 13, 2015 8:28 pm

The SubQuantum (SQ) unifies all the sciences.

Here is a starting point, which summarizes decades of empirical research:
http://www.zengardner.com/inner-workings-reality/
http://www.zengardner.com/inner-working ... ty-part-2/

Also see: http://www.zengardner.com/scientific-ev ... elligence/

I was nominated for the Nobel Prize in Physics for my work with Tony Smith, regarding projective non-linear Mobius transformation solutions to the Maxwell equations. These 15 varieties of bilinear transformations allow for E/M propagations having any velocity, ranging from zero velocity to an infinite velocity. Infinite velocity is one of the crucial understandings regarding Real Reality.

I was with Project Greenglow out of the UK for almost a decade. I was a member of the invitation only Sarfatti Group for several years. I am a member of Peter Gariaev's Wave Genetics research staff. I have produced many peer-reviewed papers regarding the physics of Consciousness, which has been my primary focus after having solved "free energy", "antigravity", faster than light travel, and other matters, such as regenerating new organs in vivo by use of holographic methods, with the patient up to 10 kilometers away from the physical location of the holographic equipment [with P. Gariaev, et al], etc..

My abbreviated and quite outdated CV can be found at http://worldwithinworlds.yolasite.com/rnboyd.php

The Electric Universe research is the best stuff I have seen in decades. Many powerful insights have arisen from continuing Electric Universe researches. Most importantly, these important realizations are supported by experiments and direct empirical observations, rather than theories, suppositions, imaginings, and dogma-filled fantasies. I know most of the major players in the E.U. community.

I am here with great pleasure :)
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

Chromium6
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by Chromium6 » Sun May 17, 2015 8:27 pm

Welcome to Thunderbolts Dr. Boyd!

I have curious question for you that I've never seen really adequately answered in books and journals.

It is simply why glucose (C6H12O6), insulin and ketones are used for fueling the "mind" and "body"?

(Ketone Bodies)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acetoacetic_acid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beta-Hydroxybutyric_acid

http://www.nootropicmind.com/better-bra ... r-ketones/

Low insulin, hypoglycemia, seems to affect one's perception of the world -- it can greatly alter vision and thought but it can also be quickly reversed with just a bit of glucose. I've sought a deeper explanation in terms of chemistry and physics on how this "altering of reality" happens, but it is difficult to find something comprehensive.

Basically, how does burning glucose/ketones (Glycosis) for ATP power our "thoughts" and "reality".
:)

Related:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PPP1R1B
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5-HT2A_receptor
A Novel Mechanism for Regulating Hepatic Glycogen Synthesis Involving Serotonin and Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-5
http://diabetes.diabetesjournals.org/co ... /1/49.full
http://www.phschool.com/science/science ... escue.html

BTW, if you want to move this post to a separate thread... not a problem. --Cr6
On the Windhexe: ''An engineer could not have invented this,'' Winsness says. ''As an engineer, you don't try anything that's theoretically impossible.''

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by seasmith » Mon May 18, 2015 8:43 am

~

Greetings Dr Boyd (and zengardner),

Always good to see folks stepping outside the "quantum" confine, be it with a "sub quantum" or supra quantum perspective.

From your linked summary:
The primary types of information conveyed by SubQuantum entities are emotions, and “mental pictures”, but many other varieties of information are also remembered by them, such as magnetic field intensities, electric field intensities, gravitational influences (if any), and so on. The memory capacity of the individual infinitesimal is quite vast, an extraordinary fact we are still having trouble coming to grips with.
Those subquantum phenomena here conceptualized as "entities" might easier be considered as confluences.
...which are evolving in the several velocity regimes which...
"Velocities", as heuristic mathematical ratios, are of course always second-order derivitives.
Is the Brain an Information generator, or is it rather the receiver of information, transducing, and then processing, sensory and intuitive experiences? Is its existence at all a prerequisite for high-level Subjective Information processing?
Yes & yes, a transceiver with universal connectivity, as recognized from very early human ages.


Cheers,s

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Mon May 18, 2015 1:21 pm

We view "empty" space as a SubQuantum plenum. Your expression of a "confluence" is quite aligned with our understandings, especially since all matter constanty emits, and constanty absorbs, information-bearing infinitesimals. The information-bearing infinitesimals are allowed to propagate at up to an infinite velocity, which is the origination of all quantum behaviors.
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Mon May 18, 2015 1:25 pm

Dear Chromium6,

I am not an MD, nor a chemist. However, a clue for you is that all multi-celled life must have a common metabolic basis, while one-celled creatures are not so metabolically constrained.
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Mon May 18, 2015 1:31 pm

Dear seasmith,

I always found the 4th derivative of velocity to be quite interesting :) What could this kind of action imply regarding such things as "quasars"?
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by seasmith » Mon May 18, 2015 5:10 pm

~

rnboyd, we have an actual velocity for a quasar ??


good science should unify all the quanta

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Tue May 19, 2015 7:32 am

Dear seasmith,

An actual velocity for a quasar? I don't think so. All the redshift nonsense is irrational and denied by the fact that there are, at a minimum, 11 different physical mechanisms which can act on light to shift it towards the red end of the spectrum. This is compounded by the fact that interstellar and intergalactic spaces are exceedingly AN-isotropic, rather than isotropic, as is commonly and mistakenly assumed.

My question was regarding the 4th derivative of motion as related to the observable behaviors of quasars themselves, how they form, and what they do. Very relevant here is quantized red shift.

Best WIshes,

Neil
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by seasmith » Tue May 19, 2015 10:47 am

Dr Boyd,

Sorry, guess i hadn't understood your earlier question.

Yes, i agree, mainstream thinking about intergalactic redshift is horribly muddled at best; and probably many on the forum would agree with your own prognosis.

As to the 4th Derivative of Motion (not of "velocity", as that would be a fifth ;) ).
one might intuitively think of some very kinky spiraling through space, the motion perhaps even forming its own conjugate ?

{Apparently the wiki contributors call that derivitive "jounce or snap".}

Does that concept enable your group to describe (in layman terms preferably) the "An-isotropy" of deep space ?

There are a couple of appealing theories regarding 'Quasars' around here as well,
but i would very much like to hear yours..

Best...
seasmith

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by kevin » Wed May 20, 2015 12:53 am

I did a loud YES, when I saw RNBOYD.
I have learn't more from You sir than almost anyone
Kevin( an odd dowser)

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Wed May 20, 2015 6:48 am

Dear seasmith,

The 4th derivative of motion is an acceleration of an acceleration. Some refer to this as a "jerk", but I think such terms obfuscate the fact of an acceleration of an acceleration.

Regarding the anisotropies of so-called "free space", here is a short study from my website:

Uniqueness is an often neglected, but essential element of the physics. There is a tendency for the intellect to create continuity and uniformity, even where such uniformity does not exist. One example of this tendency, which has unduly influenced modern physics, is the tendency to view the vacuum as a linear isotropic medium, which has identical properties at each location, and in every direction.

Observations show this view is incorrect. The vacuum is a non-linear media, and is anisotropic. For instance, see:

http://www.stsci.edu/science/preprints/ ... p1284.html

http://www.stsci.edu/science/preprints/ ... p1257.html

http://www.stsci.edu/science/preprints/ ... p1251.html

http://www.stsci.edu/science/preprints/ ... p1243.html

http://www.stsci.edu/science/preprints/ ... p1240.html

http://www.aps.org/BAPSDPP98/abs/S2500019.html

http://sepwww.stanford.edu/oldreports/sep60/60_19.pdf

http://stat.washington.edu/NCES/resourc ... 8_math.pdf

An important finding:

http://www.urc.ukans.edu/News/97N/AprNe ... lston.html

http://www.spie.org/web/oer/june/jun97/axis.html

Non-linearities not only include this above observation of spatial anisotropy and local variations in particle densities, but there are extant theories of non-linear, stochastic, and condition-variable metrics. In addition, there are constant variations, with time, at any point in space, in the intensities and frequencies of the various electromagnetic radiations which pass through that given point. Indeed, the gravitational theory described by relativity has a non-linear basis. Quantum theory also requires that spatial anisotropies must exist in order for the quantum theory to be correctly predictive. (Precisely, this is the Heisenburg Uncertainty relation.) Further, consider Zitterbewegung and the zero point quantum fluctuations of the vacuum at the order of 10^-66 cm^-2 (See "Gravitation"by Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler at page 480) Topological physics also point at non-linearities and spatial anisotropies. (For example, see: http://www22.pair.com/csdc/car/carfre77.htm )

The combination of these observations leads us to understand that any point in space must be considered as unique, for various physical reasons. Of further and large importance to this understanding is the fact of the memory of the vacuum shown by P. Gariaev, V. Poponin, et al: http://twm.co.nz/~sai/DNAPhantom.htm Poponin's model of the vacuum memory shows this memory as the Hamiltonian of a loosely coupled (anharmonic) N-dimensional system of non-linear oscillators, which is called a Fermi-Pasta-Ulam lattice (an FPU lattice). This description results from empirical observations in a series of experiments, first done at Lebedev University in Russia. In these experiments, the vacuum retained electromagnetic copies of that which had occupied volume in the vacuum chamber, for up to 30 days after the material was removed! This informs us again of nonuniformity of space, because such memories must be unique for each given volume, with variations over time.

It is likely that the personality of the human being is imprinted in the vacuum memory by the Consciousness of the human being. This possibility is enhanced when considering that the emotional condition of the operators of symplectic E/M transmission facilities directly alters the instrumented radiated patterns of the symplectic antenna.

We consider chaos theory and organization theory, and find further evidences of uniqueness. As we observe the Natural world around us, we discover that each living entity is observably possessed of this property of Uniqueness.

When a human being is born into the world, the child immediately evidences unique sets of preferences of color, style, and so on, when choosing from among various items they are presented, with choices which are unique to that individual. We observe no two human faces, fingerprints, etc., are the same. There are no two birds alike, no two leaves exactly the same. We find from various personality studies that all the various forms of life are all possessed of Personality. Even your car has a personality, if you'll be honest about it. The fact of Uniqueness is inescapable and Universal.
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

User avatar
rnboyd
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 7:57 am
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by rnboyd » Wed May 20, 2015 7:04 am

Dear Kevin,

I remember you :) Weren't you involved with Project Greenglow for a while?

All the Best,

Neil
The subquantum unfies all the sciences.

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by kevin » Wed May 20, 2015 8:06 am

rnboyd wrote:Dear Kevin,

I remember you :) Weren't you involved with Project Greenglow for a while?

All the Best,

Neil
I bounce about the net so much , I could have.
I have a simple agenda....
To puzzle out how My dowsing works.
Those here on the thunderbolts have tolerated Me, if they do keep Me down here where the best bits are.

It's very difficult dealing with that which is none visable, and not in the memory field currently of this planet.
Our information flows from the palms of our hands, and a fresh look at the Egyptian paintings is required with that simple thing in mind, imho.
Thus it is whatever the dowser thinks of that the rods react to as consciousness flows there and back.
I have viewed other times when doing this, and come off the ground, so many parts of this puzzle are not so "alternative" in My reality.
I have had three way conversations with Myself, in the most fabulous fractal reality imagninable, and My 5D self explained lots( and told Me to repeat that into My earth bound memory field.

It really is a joy to see You here.
Kevin

kevin
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:17 am

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by kevin » Wed May 20, 2015 8:14 am

RNBoyd,
You mentioned the "vacuum"
I consider that universe is a perfectly packed superconductive solid.
The packing geometry enables multiple dimensions in exactly the self same location.

Time is a local consequence relative to each creation, and is a consequence of switching.
Robert Grace...greatdreams.com and His ( leadbeaters) ANU I have high regard for, mainly because that exactly ( but uniquely) everything I focus upon is detectable as.
Polarity and equator, with a dual heart centred torroidal vortex flowing in/out via the poles.
http://www.greatdreams.com/grace/126/134anuqa.html

You sir are within such, You are remembering to be, or not to be, that is the question....how?
Kevin

seasmith
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: SubQuantum Physics

Unread post by seasmith » Wed May 20, 2015 9:28 am

RNBoyd wrote:
My question was regarding the 4th derivative of motion as related to the observable behaviors of quasars themselves, how they form, and what they do. Very relevant here is quantized red shift.
...
The 4th derivative of motion is an acceleration of an acceleration.
Dr Boyd,

Yes, that is the textbook definition of the 4th derivative of motion.
Were you going to explain your reference of that derivative, re "quasars and redshift" ?

thankyou,
s

Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests