I'm glad you posted this here so we can talk this up to the max. Since mention
is made in their presentation of Meteor Crater, Arizona, the image
below from my splash experiments is added here to show the dynamics
of a fluid hitting sediments. Of course this is an impact
point of repeated hits but the key detail is that an impact force does leave
round craters when the impactor is a not a solid and better still, if an air
burst (bolide) occurs over shallow water which
gains the added forces of hydraulics to displace saturated material below
the also surface and send a wave in all directions. Case in point, meteor
crater in Arizona at the south west edge of where once stood the
In-land Hopi Lake location. Now mudstone and siltstone surround the
crater and it is upstream from major erosion and deposit sites. The age and departure
of that lake need not be that far distant in the past, how else could the
inhabitants have justified all the effort involved in the surrounding settlements?
More on this later.

As for this larger event being spoken of, it puzzles me why Iceland has not
attracted any consideration as an impact point. Among the Azores is the
Great Meteor Tablemount, I'll get back to this later. As for the Madegascar
site it might explain something that has puzzled me. The time seperating the story
of Noah and the Days of Peleg is a moderately short period and it is in these days
of Peleg that it is said that the earth was divided by water. If a rapid slide occurred, the
forces involved in raising the Ande's and Rockies would have had the mass of
everthing west of Madegascar to force that upthrust. and if that was the end of the
event the atlantic need not have formed. I wonder, however if a recoil event followed
which gently (by comparrison) splitting the continents again,
giving a delayed action of followup separation to provide the Peleg gap and possibly
the atlantis legend as well. Many consequential events might be expected in the period
following this crustal slide. The Hydroplate research offes many details which I've
not yet seen mentioned in the Shock dynamics presentation. Just
thinking out loud here and i'll bring those details in a i get further through their presentation.
Another feature that has really caught my attention is the gap between
South America and Antarctica, the way the sea floor features and deposits
bend is a real eye opener.
http://www.newgeology.us/presentation1.html .
I hope you have time to go over these two presentations in detail.
On the subject of the theory of a growing earth is suspect this would be a consequence
of material unleashed from the earths interior during a major crustal rupture, as is indicated
by the planet-wide fracture oceanic rift. there are details to consider however, such as
contenental crust material 'under' the pacific floor. The basalt pacific floor now covers
this continental crust material which is proposed to have subsided as the Atlantic floor
rose following the relocation of the continental material overlaying a basalt layer which
is not the the atlantic's floor. No continental material is found below the atlantic floor
so this highlights the mystery in the pacific. The seamount material may have come up through
fracturing continental material and rose to the level of the ocean at that time, and now are tablemounts.
Most are now far below the pacific's surface and apparantly worn to a common height.
A good deal of info on them can be found here.
http://www.creationscience.com/onlinebo ... ches5.htmlThey cry out for further investigation. They are quit an anomoly.
d...z