Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Beyond the boundaries of established science an avalanche of exotic ideas compete for our attention. Experts tell us that these ideas should not be permitted to take up the time of working scientists, and for the most part they are surely correct. But what about the gems in the rubble pile? By what ground-rules might we bring extraordinary new possibilities to light?

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby Lloyd » Tue Nov 03, 2015 12:24 pm

SS said: As a side note: The 60-120 degree spacing of LaGrange zones have resonances in Sumerian astronomy which have never really been explained.

Would that be good to discuss in my Cataclysm thread?

Charles, would you like to critique SS's idea above? I think you'd say that in order for a galactic current to power the Sun, the current would have to be detectable and would have very large visible streamers at the solar surface. Eh?
Lloyd
 
Posts: 4382
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby seasmith » Tue Nov 03, 2015 1:04 pm

~

LLoyd wrote:

to power the Sun, the current would have to be detectable ...


Many EU proponents decry a "Gravity only" perspective, but visualize an electric cosmos in terms of
EM only .

It's time to move on.

;)
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby CharlesChandler » Tue Nov 03, 2015 5:51 pm

seasmith wrote:
Lloyd wrote:to power the Sun, the current would have to be detectable ...

Many EU proponents decry a "Gravity only" perspective, but visualize an electric cosmos in terms of
EM only.

Yes, it would have to be detectable, if not in visible light, then at the very least in radio frequencies.

One way around this is to say that the current is too thinly distributed to be detected until it gets to the Sun, where it erupts in spectacular brilliance. But that begs the question of what keeps it so distributed -- why doesn't the magnetic pinch effect consolidate the inbound current? I don't think that there is an answer to that one.

Other people seem to think that the Electric Sun hypothesis is working just fine as a rough sketch of what's going on, and which at the very least addresses questions not well treated by the "gravity only" model. And they're so satisfied that they don't see the point in further debate. For example, Monty Childs will tell you that there are only two models of the Sun: 1) the gravity only model, and 2) the anode model. If you don't like the gravity only model, what's not to like about the anode model?

Well, if you don't think that the issue is worth further consideration, then move on. ;) But I see fatal flaws in the anode model, and I'm not just looking for new or other answers -- I'm looking for correct answers. ;)
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll spend the rest of the day sitting in a small boat, drinking beer and telling dirty jokes.

Volcanoes
Astrophysics wants its physics back.
The Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadic Supercell Thunderstorms
User avatar
CharlesChandler
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:25 am
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby seasmith » Tue Nov 03, 2015 9:01 pm

~

Just to clarify, it's time to move on beyond Gravity and EM only.

~
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby CharlesChandler » Tue Nov 03, 2015 10:21 pm

seasmith wrote:Just to clarify, it's time to move on beyond Gravity and EM only.

Oh, OK. So what else is there?
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll spend the rest of the day sitting in a small boat, drinking beer and telling dirty jokes.

Volcanoes
Astrophysics wants its physics back.
The Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadic Supercell Thunderstorms
User avatar
CharlesChandler
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:25 am
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby seasmith » Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:44 am

~
Last edited by seasmith on Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby seasmith » Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:50 am

CharlesChandler wrote:
seasmith wrote:
Just to clarify, it's time to move on beyond Gravity and EM only.


Oh, OK. So what else is there?


Gravity is radial, EM is transverse and both modes decay rapidly with distance.
A third axiom of transmission is the Longitudinal.


[see Boscoviç, Tesla, Thompson, Maxwell, Steinmetz, Dollard, etc.]
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby Lloyd » Tue Nov 17, 2015 7:04 pm

Electrons Moving Sunward?
Charles, the latest TB video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=limi33LYaRU suggests that electrons are moving toward the Sun from the Comet 67P. It says that at the 14 minute mark. That would probably indicate an anode Sun, so I assume their reasoning is flawed. Can you explain their likely error?
Lloyd
 
Posts: 4382
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby CharlesChandler » Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:34 am

Lloyd wrote:Can you explain their likely error?

Currents near the comet don't necessarily indicate currents between the Sun and the comet.
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll spend the rest of the day sitting in a small boat, drinking beer and telling dirty jokes.

Volcanoes
Astrophysics wants its physics back.
The Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadic Supercell Thunderstorms
User avatar
CharlesChandler
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 6:25 am
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby seasmith » Wed Nov 18, 2015 12:57 am

seasmith » Thu Nov 05, 2015 9:50 am

CharlesChandler wrote:
seasmith wrote:
Just to clarify, it's time to move on beyond Gravity and EM only.



Oh, OK. So what else is there?



Gravity is radial, EM is transverse and both modes decay rapidly with distance.
A third axiom of transmission is the Longitudinal.



Hi Charles and Lloyd,

Here is a 2012 thread with more specific links regarding LMD~longitudinal progression:


http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=6859&start=15


Also with some cogent discussion of same by Jarvamundo and Solar, who are much more eloquent on the subject than I.
You guys don't seem to have been participants in that particular discussion, so just reposting here for reference.

cheers
seasmith
 
Posts: 2815
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:59 pm

Re: Anode Sun vs Cathode Sun

Unread postby Lloyd » Fri Nov 20, 2015 9:54 am

SeaSmith, do you mean you think the Sun is powered by longitudinal waves? If so, what are they transmitted through, and what is the source? The interstellar medium seems to be way too sparse to transmit longitudinal waves. Can you quote anything that explains how Tesla's longitudinal waves have been transmitted successfully to power an electric motor or something?
Lloyd
 
Posts: 4382
Joined: Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:54 pm

Previous

Return to New Insights and Mad Ideas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests