Magnetic monopoles

[KickLaBuka]

I like the idea, but I don't see how an electron and positron come out when an electron changes energy levels.

Ok, can you be more specific, what happens in what experiment that you think contradicts this theory?

I’m thinking about the physical possibility. You can set up an experiment where you shoot an electron and a positron together, but a photon is the energy released when an electron changes orbital radius. So the experiment may look like a photon, but it doesn’t make it one. It would be on you to explain how an electron and a positron can be created out of nothing when an electron changes orbital radius.

Think of electron beam and single free electrons in a SINGLE INSTANT.


An electron in a single instant is motionless, it has no magnetic field.

Only mathematically. In reality, the electron doesn’t stop and the magnetic field is never zero, so it’s better to think of the electron as it’s moving, a differential equation, in time. That’s why quantum fails. It only checks position or momentum, not position and momentum. This is what would be required to fully explain something. What I just said is the only explanation to get rid of the need for a strong nuclear force, so anyone, who believes in quantum as a physical reality and also accepts no strong force, is selling you something.

[sharonk868]

Positrons aren't so common out there. Think about the protons with mass.

I think electromagnetic radiation, including photons, is actually made of electrons and positrons, so according to me, there are lots of positrons out there.

And the 1r^2 And other functions, thats only when They're alone. When things are moving and when There's multiple systems, thats no longer valid.

I assure you it's still pretty valid, as valid as it can be confirmed... very valid that is.

Why do you think anything changes with multiple charges and when things start to move?

Thanks you for the post.
Hi guys, Im a newbie. Nice to join this forum.

[scotty]

We are discussing monopoles while talking about electrons and using current flow drawings that show the current going from pos to neg..... conventional current.

The electron cannot pass through glass, yet it is the building block of everything?
"Not more than one in a thousand men of science knows that an electron -whatever it be—can only exist in the perfect vacuum of intermolecular and interstellar spaces or highly exhausted tubes ." Nikola Tesla. 1931

"We have North and South pole magnets, positive and negative electricity, protons, and electrons,
positrons and mesons and alpha, beta and gamma rays. Now why such a confusion? Does nature
really need so many things in the perpetual transformation of things, on building up the matter and
again taking it into parts? I think all that nature needs is three things, the North and South pole
magnets and the neutral particles. " Edward Leedskalnin.

"The North and South pole individual magnets are the cosmic force. They are the building
blocks of nature's perpetual transformation of matter, and they are so small that they can
pass through everything. They pass through the earth from pole to pole, and around the earth.
If the North and South pole individual magnets could not pass through a vacuum tube the
same as the Thomsons electrons cannot, then they could not be the building blocks.

They are so small that they can pass through anything.. In fact they can pass
through metal easier than through the air. They are in constant motion, they are
running one kind of magnets against the other kind, and if guided in the right channels
they possess perpetual power.

The Thomson electrons are very small parts of matter which come out of the cathode while
the cathode is burned up or consumed in the vacuum tube." Ed.L
-----------------------
Scotty.
http://leedskalnin.net/writing.htm