star ignition

Plasma and electricity in space. Failure of gravity-only cosmology. Exposing the myths of dark matter, dark energy, black holes, neutron stars, and other mathematical constructs. The electric model of stars. Predictions and confirmations of the electric comet.

Moderators: MGmirkin, bboyer

star ignition

Unread postby rickard » Wed Jun 26, 2019 10:18 am

80 % of the solar systems in the Milky-way are binary stars
Saturn and Jupiter are in some ways similar to the sun, does that mean that it is possible that some kind of electrical "ignition" or discharge could turn them into a real sun state, so that our galaxy "adapt" to the general principle of the "state of stars" in our galaxy ?
rickard
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: star ignition

Unread postby Cargo » Wed Jun 26, 2019 10:20 pm

Allow me to bite.

Every Planet* was once a Star. Or part of.
It's very possible that either S or J were once in Star Form. If both, this begs that there was a 4th Star which should have Been. Perhaps that's the mysterious Dark 9Th Planet out-there.

All Life comes in Pairs.
interstellar filaments conducted electricity having currents as high as 10 thousand billion amperes
Cargo
 
Posts: 294
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 7:02 pm

Re: star ignition

Unread postby The Great Dog » Fri Jul 05, 2019 1:07 pm

Instead of personal, unfocused theories, here is the electric explanation. This is, after all, the Electric Universe board.

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2017/08/25/binaries/

TGD
There are no other dogs but The Great Dog
User avatar
The Great Dog
 
Posts: 253
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:58 pm

Re: star ignition

Unread postby ja7tdo » Fri Jul 05, 2019 7:55 pm

hi,

Jupiter and Saturn was old Sun in our solar system.

Sun may be hollow
https://etherealmatters.org/article/sun-may-be-hollow
ja7tdo
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:36 am
Location: Japan

Re: star ignition

Unread postby rickard » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:56 am

The Great Dog wrote:Instead of personal, unfocused theories, here is the electric explanation. This is, after all, the Electric Universe board.

https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2017/08/25/binaries/

TGD


We are all "researchers" who try to understand life, and only through testing new ideas you find new things or explanations. If Thornhill and co had stuck to only "focused theories", we had probably still seen only "black holes".
rickard
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2017 1:19 pm

Re: star ignition

Unread postby Prospector » Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:24 pm

Science is supposed to be based on observations. The ancient Egyptians recorded two suns before the one we have now. One of those suns is now called Jupiter. That is why ancients worshipped Jupiter, also called Jove. The other sun is now called Saturn.
User avatar
Prospector
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 9:58 am

Re: star ignition

Unread postby nick c » Mon Aug 19, 2019 7:57 am

TGD wrote:Instead of personal, unfocused theories, here is the electric explanation. This is, after all, the Electric Universe board.
Yes. Favorite or personal non EU theorizing should not take place on this board. There is a board where forum members are free to post non EU theorizing. Even that should at least be tangentially related to EU or Plasma Cosmology literature.
For more info read the last post in this thread:
Rules and Guidelines


The Electric Universe model for star formation begins with the z pinch. Stars are formed in cosmic molecular plasma clouds and then dispersed through the galaxy. If a particular star is overly stressed by the current load it may fission into two or more parts, increasing the surface area lowering the load, forming binary or multiple stars.

In our Solar System the bulk of the incoming galactic current is being usurped by the Sun. If Jupiter or Saturn were traveling solo in space they would probably have the appearance of a small brown dwarf, otherwise in the same system as the Sun they do not receive enough current to power them up. So the EU labels them as "failed" stars as does mainstream, but for different reasons. (There are many ancient references to Saturn being a sun, which if accepted would imply that the electric environment was much different than today, but that is another story probably not suited to this thread.)

Mainstream has the Hertsprung-Russell diagram as its depiction of stellar evolution. The H-R diagram is useful to the EU, not for the understanding of stellar evolution, but rather as an indicator of the electrical status of a given star. The implication of this is that stars can change their appearance rapidly if their ambient electric environment changes. There is already some evidence of this having been observed.

references:
http://electric-cosmos.org/hrdiagr.html
http://www.holoscience.com/wp/assemblin ... ar-system/
http://www.holoscience.com/wp/twinkle-t ... tric-star/
http://www.holoscience.com/wp/electric-galaxies/
User avatar
nick c
Moderator
 
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:12 pm
Location: connecticut

Re: star ignition

Unread postby ja7tdo » Thu Aug 22, 2019 3:39 am

Prospector wrote:Science is supposed to be based on observations. The ancient Egyptians recorded two suns before the one we have now. One of those suns is now called Jupiter. That is why ancients worshipped Jupiter, also called Jove. The other sun is now called Saturn.

The Aztec sun stone says that the present sun is fifth. The sun is a cavity, and when the cavity collapses, it becomes a gas planet. Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, and Jupiter were ancient suns.
ja7tdo
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2017 7:36 am
Location: Japan


Return to Electric Universe

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests